Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GLM 5V Turbo
Compare Gemini 3.5 Flash and GLM 5V Turbo side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Open Prompt, Image Captioning, OCR, Classification, and Object Detection.
Compare Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GLM 5V Turbo live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Models in this comparison
Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GLM 5V Turbo on Vision Evals
Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher on all six Vision Evals tasks.
The widest gap is Reasoning, where Gemini 3.5 Flash leads 84.1% to 31.8%.
Overall, Gemini 3.5 Flash averages 86.9% (#1 of 34) against 65.3% (#26 of 34) for GLM 5V Turbo.
GLM 5V Turbo is cheaper ($0.0031 vs $0.011 per sample), while Gemini 3.5 Flash is faster (5.8s vs 6.3s per sample).
Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GLM 5V Turbo Comparison Table
Evals updated August 27, 2026Pricing updated September 2, 2026
| Property | Gemini 3.5 Flash | GLM 5V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | Z.ai | |
| Category | closed | closed |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | May 2026 | Apr 2026 |
| Context Window | 1.0M | 200K |
| Parameters | ||
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $1.50 | $1.20 |
| Output $/1M | $9.00 | $4.00 |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Captioning | Demo | Demo |
| Chart Question Answering | ||
| Classification | Demo | Demo |
| Document Question Answering | ||
| Image Tagging | ||
| Multi-Label Classification | ||
| Object Detection | Demo | Demo |
| OCR | Demo | Demo |
| Vision Language | ||
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | Demo |
| Model Features | ||
| Foundation Vision | ||
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | ||
| Multimodal Vision | ||
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort | ||
| Overall | 86.9% | 65.3% |
| Avg cost / sample | $0.011 | $0.0031 |
| Avg speed / sample | 5.82s | 6.35s |
| By task | ||
| Object Detection | 70.2% $0.016 | 56.5% $0.0052 |
| Counting | 81.1% $0.0075 | 48.6% $0.0017 |
| Identification | 100.0% $0.0042 | 84.4% $0.0015 |
| OCR | 91.1% $0.016 | 89.3% $0.0030 |
| Data Extraction | 94.8% $0.0037 | 81.4% $0.0018 |
| Reasoning (low) | 84.1% $0.0080 | 31.8% $0.0017 |
| Reasoning (high) | 82.8% $0.017 | 49.7% $0.0069 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GLM 5V Turbo: Overview
Gemini 3.5 Flash is a multimodal language model developed by Google DeepMind and released at Google I/O 2026. It is built on the Gemini 3 Flash reasoning foundation and introduces configurable thinking levels (minimal, low, medium, and high) that allow developers to tune the depth of internal reasoning before a response is generated. The model accepts text, image, video, audio, and PDF inputs and produces text output, with a 1 million token context window and up to 65,000 output tokens per request. It is natively multimodal, processing visual inputs alongside text to support tasks such as image captioning, classification, optical character recognition, object detection, and visual grounding, where the model references specific regions within an image or video frame.
Its vision capabilities extend to interpreting UI screenshots, diagrams, charts, and real-world scenes, as well as understanding video and live frame sequences for activity and scene recognition. The model supports combined tool use, including Google Search, URL context, code execution, and custom functions, within a single request, and it uses reasoning context from previous turns when thought signatures are present in the conversation history, enabling persistent multi-turn reasoning chains. Gemini 3.5 Flash carries a knowledge cutoff of January 2026 and is available via the Gemini API, Google AI Studio, Google Antigravity, and the Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform.
GLM-5V-Turbo is a native multimodal model from Z.ai that extends the GLM family with joint image, video, and text input aimed at vision-centered coding and agent workflows. The model reads screenshots, design drafts, document layouts, and interface captures and generates runnable code from them, covering tasks such as turning a visual design into a working front end, diagnosing rendering and layout defects from screen captures, and operating graphical user interfaces during long-horizon agent runs. It accepts roughly 200,000 input tokens and can emit up to 131,072 output tokens in a single response, which supports sessions that hold specifications, source files, logs, and visual references at the same time.
Training includes a joint reinforcement learning stage spanning more than 30 tasks simultaneously, an approach Z.ai describes as a way to counter the trade-off in which improving visual recognition degrades programming ability and the reverse. Reported evaluations cover pure-text coding on the backend, frontend, and repository exploration tracks of CC-Bench-V2, together with agent execution suites such as PinchBench, ClawEval, and ZClawBench, indicating that text coding behavior is retained after visual input is added.