Roboflow

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Gemma 3 27B

Compare Claude Sonnet 5 and Gemma 3 27B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Open Prompt, OCR, and Image Captioning.

Compare Claude Sonnet 5 vs Gemma 3 27B live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
AnthropicClaude Sonnet 5
Run to compare this model.
GoogleGemma 3 27B
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Gemma 3 27B: Overview

Claude Sonnet 5

Claude Sonnet 5 is a mid-tier large language model from Anthropic, released on June 30, 2026, as the latest model in the Sonnet series and a direct successor to Claude Sonnet 4.6. It is a hybrid reasoning model designed primarily for agentic workflows, software coding, and professional tasks. The model features a 1 million token context window, a 128k maximum output token limit, and runs adaptive thinking by default, giving API users fine-grained control over reasoning effort across five levels (low, medium, high, max, and extra-high). It uses an updated tokenizer shared with Opus 4.7 and later models, which produces approximately 30% more tokens for equivalent text compared to earlier Claude models. On benchmarks, Sonnet 5 scores 63.2% on agentic coding and 81.2% on OSWorld, narrowing the gap with Opus 4.8 while remaining at Sonnet-tier pricing.

The model supports text and image input with text output, and accepts tools including browsers and terminals for autonomous multi-step task execution. Anthropic's safety evaluations report that Sonnet 5 shows a lower rate of undesirable behaviors than Sonnet 4.6 and is generally safer in agentic contexts, with improved resistance to prompt injection and reduced sycophancy. Cybersecurity safeguards equivalent to those on Opus 4.7 and 4.8 are active, though Anthropic notes the model was not deliberately trained on cybersecurity tasks. The model is proprietary and API-only, with no open weights.

Gemma 3 27B

Gemma 3 27B, announced on March 12, 2025, is the largest open-weight model in Google DeepMind’s Gemma 3 family. With around 27 billion parameters, it is multimodal—accepting both text and images as input and producing text outputs. It supports a 128,000-token context window and typically generates up to ~8,192 tokens, enabling it to process multi-page documents, extended conversations, or large batches of images in a single prompt.

The model is instruction-tuned in its “-it” variants for chat, reasoning, and summarization use cases, and it supports structured outputs and function calling. It is multilingual, covering over 140 languages. Deployment is flexible: the full BF16 model requires ~46 GB of VRAM, but quantization-aware training (QAT) versions in 8-bit or 4-bit reduce the footprint significantly, allowing more accessible use outside large-scale clusters. While it delivers stronger reasoning and multimodal performance than smaller Gemma models, it remains lighter and more open than proprietary systems, making it well-suited for research, development, and fine-tuned applications.

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Gemma 3 27B Comparison Table

PropertyClaude Sonnet 5Gemma 3 27B
OrganizationAnthropicGoogle
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateJun 2026Mar 2025
Context Window1.0M128K
Parameters
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$2.00$0.080
Output $/1M$10.00$0.160
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
ClassificationDemo
Document Question Answering
Multi-Label Classification
Object DetectionDemo
Model Features
Multimodal Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
70.15%
58.21%
Avg Response Time3.90s33.60s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens2.1K
Median output tokens61
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0048
Defect Detection
73.3%(11/15)
60%(9/15)
Document Understanding
66.7%(6/9)
77.8%(7/9)
Object Counting
20%(2/10)
10%(1/10)
Object Understanding
92.9%(13/14)
71.4%(10/14)
Spatial Understanding
78.9%(15/19)
63.2%(12/19)
OCR
Overall Score
83.84%
Avg Response Time2.77s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens642
Median output tokens64
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0019
Focused Scene OCR
88.9%(88/99)
Handwritten Math
50%(5/10)
License Plate Recognition
90%(27/30)
Text Recognition
80%(24/30)
VQA & Extraction
80%(48/60)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology