Roboflow

Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3 Flash

Compare Claude Fable 5 and Gemini 3 Flash side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, Classification, OCR, Open Prompt, and Object Detection.

Compare Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3 Flash live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
AnthropicClaude Fable 5
Run to compare this model.
GoogleGemini 3 Flash
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3 Flash on Vision Evals

Claude Fable 5 scores higher on 4 of the six Vision Evals tasks.

The widest gap is Object Detection, where Claude Fable 5 leads 56.0% to 38.6%.

Overall, Claude Fable 5 averages 78.8% (#7 of 25) against 74.9% (#10 of 25) for Gemini 3 Flash.

Gemini 3 Flash is both cheaper ($0.0021 vs $0.034 per sample) and faster (4.1s vs 8.7s per sample).

Claude Fable 5Gemini 3 Flash

Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3 Flash Comparison Table

Evals updated August 6, 2026Pricing updated August 7, 2026

PropertyClaude Fable 5Gemini 3 Flash
OrganizationAnthropicGoogle
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateJun 2026Dec 2025
Context Window1.0M1.0M
Parameters
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$10.00$0.500
Output $/1M$50.00$3.00
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Chart Question Answering
ClassificationDemoDemo
Document Question Answering
Image Tagging
Multi-Label Classification
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Model Features
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
78.8%
74.9%
Avg cost / sample$0.034$0.0021
Avg speed / sample8.71s4.10s
By task
Object Detection
56.0%
$0.059
38.6%
$0.0031
Counting
63.5%
$0.017
67.6%
$0.0012
Identification
100.0%
$0.014
93.8%
$0.0009
OCR
94.0%
$0.039
87.6%
$0.0024
Data Extraction
92.8%
$0.015
96.9%
$0.0008
Reasoning (low)
66.2%
$0.018
64.9%
$0.0020
Reasoning (high)
66.2%
$0.024
74.2%
$0.0040

Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3 Flash: Overview

Claude Fable 5

Claude Fable 5 is Anthropic's first generally available Mythos-class large language model, released on June 9, 2026. It is built for long-horizon, asynchronous, and agentic tasks that prior Claude generations could not sustain, including multi-day autonomous coding sessions, complex knowledge work, and document-heavy analysis. The model supports a 1 million token context window with up to 128,000 output tokens per request and uses adaptive thinking as its sole reasoning mode, where the effort level is adjustable but raw chain-of-thought is never returned. Vision capabilities allow the model to parse diagrams, charts, and tables embedded in files and PDFs, and to use visual feedback to evaluate its own coding outputs against design goals. On benchmarks such as SWE-Bench Pro, the model scores 80.3% compared to 69.2% for Claude Opus 4.8, and it leads on CursorBench 3.1 for autonomous coding workflows.

Claude Fable 5 shares the same underlying model weights as Claude Mythos 5, but is deployed with safety classifiers that automatically reroute queries in high-risk domains — including cybersecurity, biology, and chemistry — to Claude Opus 4.8. These classifiers trigger in fewer than 5% of sessions on average. As a designated Covered Model, all traffic is subject to mandatory 30-day data retention to support safety monitoring. The model is available via the Claude API, Amazon Bedrock, Vertex AI, and Microsoft Foundry. Anthropic has not publicly disclosed parameter count, architecture details, or training data composition for this model.

Gemini 3 Flash

Gemini 3 Flash is a proprietary multimodal large language model developed by Google through Google DeepMind, designed to deliver fast, cost-efficient reasoning across real-time products and developer workflows. Released in December 2025, it is the Flash-tier variant of the Gemini 3 family, balancing low latency with reasoning quality approaching Pro models.

The model supports text, images, audio, and video, with an exceptionally large context window of roughly one million input tokens and outputs up to ~65k tokens. It emphasizes rapid responses for coding, summarization, analysis, and agentic tasks, and exposes configurable “thinking levels” via API to trade speed for deeper reasoning. Today, Gemini 3 Flash positions itself as a high-throughput, production-ready model, serving as the default in the Gemini app and Google Search’s AI Mode, optimized for scalable, interactive AI applications.

Frequently Asked Questions

On Roboflow's Vision Evals, Claude Fable 5 performed better. It scores higher on 4 of the six vision tasks and averages 78.8% (#7 of 25) against 74.9% (#10 of 25) for Gemini 3 Flash. These scores measure vision capabilities only; either model may perform differently on work outside this benchmark's tasks.

Yes. On the Vision Evals Object Detection benchmark, Claude Fable 5 leads with 56.0% against 38.6%. This is the widest gap between the two models across the benchmark's tasks.

Gemini 3 Flash is cheaper to run. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals task mix it averaged $0.0021 per sample against $0.034. Claude Fable 5 is priced at $10.00 per 1M input tokens and $50.00 per 1M output; Gemini 3 Flash is priced at $0.50 per 1M input tokens and $3.00 per 1M output. Actual costs depend on your image sizes, prompts, and output length.

Gemini 3 Flash is faster. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals it averaged 4.1s per inference against 8.7s. Latency varies with image size, prompt length, and provider load, so treat these as relative rather than guaranteed figures.

Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for image captioning and image classification in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.