Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Gemini 3 Flash

Compare Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Gemini 3 Flash side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, Classification, Open Prompt, Object Detection, and OCR.

Compare Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Gemini 3 Flash live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
AnthropicClaude Sonnet 4.6
Run to compare this model.
GoogleGemini 3 Flash
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Gemini 3 Flash: Overview

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Claude Sonnet 4.6 is Anthropic's mid-tier large language model, released February 17, 2026, designed to balance performance, cost, and versatility for professional and developer use. It supports text and vision-based tasks with advanced reasoning, agentic capabilities, and Adaptive Thinking — a mode where the model dynamically scales its internal reasoning depth. A beta context window of up to 1,000,000 tokens (200K standard) enables processing of entire codebases or document collections in a single request. Parameters are undisclosed.

Optimized for coding, computer use, long-context reasoning, agent planning, and knowledge work, Sonnet 4.6 delivers a full generational upgrade over Sonnet 4.5 and approaches Opus 4.5-level performance across many benchmarks at a fraction of the cost. It is the default model on Claude.ai, Claude Cowork, and is available via API and major cloud platforms — making it well suited for production workloads requiring strong reasoning without flagship pricing.

Gemini 3 Flash

Gemini 3 Flash is a proprietary multimodal large language model developed by Google through Google DeepMind, designed to deliver fast, cost-efficient reasoning across real-time products and developer workflows. Released in December 2025, it is the Flash-tier variant of the Gemini 3 family, balancing low latency with reasoning quality approaching Pro models.

The model supports text, images, audio, and video, with an exceptionally large context window of roughly one million input tokens and outputs up to ~65k tokens. It emphasizes rapid responses for coding, summarization, analysis, and agentic tasks, and exposes configurable “thinking levels” via API to trade speed for deeper reasoning. Today, Gemini 3 Flash positions itself as a high-throughput, production-ready model, serving as the default in the Gemini app and Google Search’s AI Mode, optimized for scalable, interactive AI applications.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Gemini 3 Flash Comparison Table

PropertyClaude Sonnet 4.6Gemini 3 Flash
OrganizationAnthropicGoogle
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateFeb 2026Dec 2025
Context Window1.0M1.0M
Parameters
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$3.00$0.500
Output $/1M$15.00$3.00
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
ClassificationDemoDemo
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Model Features
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
70.15%
74.63%
Avg Response Time4.24s9.85s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens2.2K1.1K
Median output tokens105290
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0080$0.0014
Defect Detection
80%(12/15)
73.3%(11/15)
Document Understanding
77.8%(7/9)
88.9%(8/9)
Object Counting
30%(3/10)
30%(3/10)
Object Understanding
71.4%(10/14)
85.7%(12/14)
Spatial Understanding
78.9%(15/19)
84.2%(16/19)
OCR
Overall Score
86.82%
93.01%
Avg Response Time3.27s12.40s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens7021.1K
Median output tokens84160
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0034$0.0010
Focused Scene OCR
85.9%(85/99)
94.9%(94/99)
Handwritten Math
100%(10/10)
License Plate Recognition
90%(27/30)
100%(30/30)
Text Recognition
86.7%(26/30)
VQA & Extraction
88.3%(53/60)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology