Roboflow

Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5 27B

Compare Muse Glimmer 30B and Qwen3.5 27B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, Open Prompt, Classification, Object Detection, and OCR.

Compare Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5 27B live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
MetaMuse Glimmer 30B
Run to compare this model.
QwenQwen3.5 27B
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5 27B on Vision Evals

Muse Glimmer 30B scores higher on 5 of the six Vision Evals tasks.

The widest gap is Reasoning, where Muse Glimmer 30B leads 57.6% to 31.8%.

Overall, Muse Glimmer 30B averages 70.8% (#15 of 30) against 64.3% (#26 of 30) for Qwen3.5 27B.

Qwen3.5 27B is both cheaper ($0.0007 vs $0.0013 per sample) and faster (7.4s vs 8.7s per sample).

Muse Glimmer 30BQwen3.5 27B

Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5 27B Comparison Table

Evals updated August 14, 2026Pricing updated August 15, 2026

PropertyMuse Glimmer 30BQwen3.5 27B
OrganizationMetaQwen
Categoryopenopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateAug 2026Feb 2026
Context Window131K262K
Parameters29.6B27B
LicenseApache 2.0Apache 2.0
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.350$0.195
Output $/1M$1.50$1.56
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Chart Question Answering
ClassificationDemoDemo
Document Question Answering
Image Tagging
Multi-Label Classification
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Model Features
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
70.8%
64.3%
Avg cost / sample$0.0013$0.0007
Avg speed / sample8.70s7.38s
By task
Object Detection
41.0%
$0.0020
58.8%
$0.0013
Counting
66.2%
$0.0008
54.0%
$0.0002
Identification
81.3%
$0.0006
78.1%
$0.0002
OCR
92.1%
$0.0012
84.5%
$0.0009
Data Extraction
86.6%
$0.0007
78.3%
$0.0002
Reasoning (low)
57.6%
$0.0010
31.8%
$0.0002
Reasoning (high)
62.9%
$0.0033
61.6%
$0.0065

Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5 27B: Overview

Muse Glimmer 30B

Muse Glimmer 30B is a dense vision language model from Meta built for long-horizon agentic work on local hardware. The architecture pairs a 52-layer causal text decoder with a roughly 1.8B parameter ViT-G/14 perception encoder for about 29.6 billion parameters in total, and it accepts interleaved text and image input so an agent can interpret screenshots, charts, and documents alongside conversation. The decoder uses grouped-query attention with 32 query heads and 2 key-value heads, a repeating pattern of three sliding-window local attention layers followed by one global layer, SwiGLU feed-forward blocks, and rotary position embeddings applied on the local layers, supporting a trained context of 131,072 tokens.

Meta describes the model as distilled from the larger Muse Spark and trained and evaluated around agentic behavior: end-to-end task completion, schema-accurate tool calling, multi-step reasoning across extended workflows, and recovery when a tool call returns an unexpected result. Reasoning effort is selectable across low, medium, high, and xhigh settings, and the model emits channel-scoped reasoning traces together with XML style tool calls rather than JSON, which requires parsers specific to this family. A companion block-diffusion drafter head predicts blocks of 16 tokens per forward pass for speculative decoding, with the main model verifying the proposals in parallel.

Qwen3.5 27B

Qwen3.5-27B is a multimodal dense hybrid model developed by Alibaba Cloud’s Qwen team and released in February 2026 as a high-precision entry in the Qwen3.5 "Medium" series. Unlike its Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) siblings, the 27B model utilizes a dense architecture combining Gated Delta Networks with a feed-forward structure, activating its full parameter suite for every inference to maximize reliability. This design provides the highest instruction-following and coding accuracy in its class, with a notable IFEval score of 95.0. The model features a native 262K-token context window, extensible to 1M tokens via YaRN (RoPE scaling), and is released under the Apache-2.0 license.

Optimized for agentic workflows, Qwen3.5-27B employs an early-fusion architecture that treats visual and textual data as a unified stream for deep cross-modal reasoning. This unified approach allows the model to excel in technical analysis and software engineering, matching GPT-5-mini with a 72.4% score on SWE-bench Verified. While the larger MoE variants in the family lead in raw knowledge benchmarks, the 27B model offers a stable and high-density alternative for structured data extraction and spatial perception, contributing to the Qwen3.5 family’s generational leap in OCR accuracy over the previous Qwen3-VL series.

Frequently Asked Questions

On Roboflow's Vision Evals, Muse Glimmer 30B performed better. It scores higher on 5 of the six vision tasks and averages 70.8% (#15 of 30) against 64.3% (#26 of 30) for Qwen3.5 27B. These scores measure vision capabilities only; either model may perform differently on work outside this benchmark's tasks.

Yes. On the Vision Evals Reasoning benchmark at low effort, Muse Glimmer 30B leads with 57.6% against 31.8%. This is the widest gap between the two models across the benchmark's tasks.

Qwen3.5 27B is cheaper to run. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals task mix it averaged $0.0007 per sample against $0.0013. Muse Glimmer 30B is priced at $0.35 per 1M input tokens and $1.50 per 1M output; Qwen3.5 27B is priced at $0.20 per 1M input tokens and $1.56 per 1M output. Actual costs depend on your image sizes, prompts, and output length.

Qwen3.5 27B is faster. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals it averaged 7.4s per inference against 8.7s. Latency varies with image size, prompt length, and provider load, so treat these as relative rather than guaranteed figures.

Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for image captioning and open prompts in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.