MiMo V2.6 Pro vs Qwen3.6 27B
Compare MiMo V2.6 Pro and Qwen3.6 27B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, OCR, and Open Prompt.
Compare MiMo V2.6 Pro vs Qwen3.6 27B live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Models in this comparison
MiMo V2.6 Pro vs Qwen3.6 27B on Vision Evals
Qwen3.6 27B scores higher on 5 of the six Vision Evals tasks.
The widest gap is Reasoning, where Qwen3.6 27B leads 59.2% to 35.1%.
Overall, MiMo V2.6 Pro averages 62.5% (#49 of 59) against 73.6% (#22 of 59) for Qwen3.6 27B.
MiMo V2.6 Pro is both cheaper ($0.0008 vs $0.0021 per sample) and faster (8.5s vs 42.1s per sample).
MiMo V2.6 Pro vs Qwen3.6 27B Comparison Table
Evals updated September 22, 2026Pricing updated September 23, 2026
| Property | MiMo V2.6 Pro | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | Xiaomi | Qwen |
| Category | open | open |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Sep 2026 | Apr 2026 |
| Context Window | 1.0M | 262K |
| Parameters | 1.02T total, 42B active | 27B |
| License | MIT | Apache 2.0 |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $0.435 | $0.320 |
| Output $/1M | $0.870 | $2.70 |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Captioning | Demo | Demo |
| Chart Question Answering | ||
| Classification | Demo | |
| Document Question Answering | ||
| Image Tagging | ||
| Multi-Label Classification | ||
| OCR | Demo | Demo |
| Vision Language | ||
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | Demo |
| object-detection | Demo | |
| Video Classification | ||
| Model Features | ||
| Foundation Vision | ||
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | ||
| Multimodal Vision | ||
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort | ||
| Overall | 62.5% | 73.6% |
| Quantizationsself-hosted | ||
| Avg cost / sample | $0.0008 | $0.0021 |
| Avg speed / sample | 8.47s | 42.09s |
| By task | ||
| Object Detection (low) | 42.0% ±1.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 40.9 to 43.1 | 59.7% ±0.9, Mean of 3 runs, range 59.0 to 60.8 |
| Object Detection (high) | 46.7% ±0.8, Mean of 3 runs, range 45.7 to 47.3 | – |
| Counting (low) | 50.0% ±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 48.6 to 52.7 | 67.1% ±4.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 62.2 to 71.6 |
| Counting (high) | 59.0% ±5.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 52.7 to 63.5 | – |
| Identification (low) | 76.0% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 75.0 to 78.1 | 82.3% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.3 to 84.4 |
| Identification (high) | 78.1% ±4.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 71.9 to 81.3 | – |
| OCR (low) | 90.7% ±1.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 88.5 to 91.9 | 88.5% ±1.9, Mean of 3 runs, range 86.7 to 90.6 |
| OCR (high) | 87.5% ±2.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 85.3 to 90.6 | – |
| Data Extraction (low) | 81.1% ±0.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 80.4 to 81.4 | 84.5% ±1.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 83.5 to 85.6 |
| Data Extraction (high) | 80.4% ±1.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 79.4 to 82.5 | – |
| Reasoning (low) | 35.1% ±2.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 32.5 to 37.8 | 59.2% ±1.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 57.6 to 60.9 |
| Reasoning (high) | 55.9% ±2.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 54.3 to 58.9 | – |
MiMo V2.6 Pro vs Qwen3.6 27B: Overview
MiMo V2.6 Pro is the flagship omni-modal foundation model in Xiaomi's MiMo V2.6 series, released as open weights alongside a Flash variant and a 9B distillation of Qwen3.5. It uses a sparse mixture-of-experts transformer with 1.02 trillion total parameters and roughly 42 billion activated per token, paired with a hybrid attention design that interleaves sliding-window and global attention layers to support a context window of about one million tokens. Dedicated encoders handle non-text inputs, including a vision encoder of roughly 681 million parameters and an audio tokenizer stack, so the model accepts text, images, video, and audio and returns text.
Post-training centers on large-scale reinforcement learning across thousands of interactive environments, combined with agentic grading, self-correction cold start, and a multi-prefix multi-teacher on-policy distillation stage that extends behavior to tasks that are hard to verify automatically. The resulting model targets long-horizon agentic work such as software engineering, terminal and computer-use operation, tool calling, cybersecurity analysis, and visual coding, and it reports gains over the prior MiMo generation on SWE-bench Verified, Terminal Bench, and internal visual coding and cyber benchmarks.
Qwen3.6-27B is a dense 27-billion-parameter multimodal language model developed by Alibaba's Qwen team and released on April 22, 2026. It combines a causal language model with an integrated vision encoder, supporting text, image, and video inputs natively. The architecture employs a hybrid attention design that interleaves Gated DeltaNet linear attention blocks with standard Gated Attention layers across 64 transformer layers with a hidden dimension of 5,120. Unlike Mixture-of-Experts variants in the Qwen3.6 family, all 27 billion parameters are active on every inference pass, simplifying deployment and quantization. The model supports a native context window of 262,144 tokens, extensible to approximately 1,010,000 tokens via YaRN scaling. It is released under the Apache 2.0 license with open weights available on Hugging Face and ModelScope.
The model introduces two notable capabilities relative to prior Qwen releases: enhanced agentic coding support covering frontend workflows and repository-level reasoning, and a Thinking Preservation mechanism that retains chain-of-thought reasoning context across multi-turn conversation history to reduce redundant token generation in iterative agent sessions. It supports both a thinking mode for multi-step reasoning and a non-thinking mode for faster responses within a single model. On coding benchmarks, Qwen reports scores of 77.2 on SWE-bench Verified, 59.3 on Terminal-Bench 2.0, and 48.2 on SkillsBench. Vision capabilities include chart understanding (CharXiv RQ: 78.4), OCR (CC-OCR: 81.2), and video understanding (VideoMME with subtitles: 87.7).