Roboflow

MiMo V2.6 Flash vs MiMo V2.6 Pro

Compare MiMo V2.6 Flash and MiMo V2.6 Pro side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, OCR, Classification, Object Detection, and Open Prompt.

Compare MiMo V2.6 Flash vs MiMo V2.6 Pro live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
MiMo V2.6 Flash
Run to compare this model.
MiMo V2.6 Pro
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

MiMo V2.6 Flash vs MiMo V2.6 Pro on Vision Evals

MiMo V2.6 Pro scores higher on 3 of the five Vision Evals tasks.

The widest gap is Object Detection, where MiMo V2.6 Pro leads 42.0% to 37.8%.

Overall, MiMo V2.6 Flash averages 49.2% (#55 of 63) against 50.3% (#54 of 63) for MiMo V2.6 Pro.

MiMo V2.6 Flash is cheaper ($0.0003 vs $0.0011 per sample), while MiMo V2.6 Pro is faster (9.5s vs 16.3s per sample).

MiMo V2.6 FlashMiMo V2.6 Pro

MiMo V2.6 Flash vs MiMo V2.6 Pro Comparison Table

Evals updated October 13, 2026Pricing updated October 24, 2026

PropertyMiMo V2.6 FlashMiMo V2.6 Pro
OrganizationXiaomiXiaomi
Categoryopenopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateSep 2026Sep 2026
Context Window1.0M1.0M
Parameters309B total, 15B active1.02T total, 42B active
LicenseMITMIT
Commercial usefree for commercial usefree for commercial use
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.140$0.435
Output $/1M$0.280$0.870
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Chart Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
ClassificationDemoDemo
Document Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
Image TaggingSupportedSupported
Multi-Label ClassificationSupportedSupported
object-detectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision LanguageSupportedSupported
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Model Features
Foundation VisionSupportedSupported
LLMs with Vision CapabilitiesSupportedSupported
Multimodal VisionSupportedSupported
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
49.2%
50.3%
Avg cost / sample$0.0003$0.0011
Avg speed / sample16.34s9.45s
By task
Object Detection (low)
37.8%
±1.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 36.4 to 38.7
$0.0004
42.0%
±1.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 40.9 to 43.1
$0.0014
Object Detection (high)
45.0%
±2.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 42.2 to 47.1
$0.0009
46.7%
±0.8, Mean of 3 runs, range 45.7 to 47.3
$0.0030
Counting (low)
49.5%
±8.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 41.9 to 58.1
$0.0002
50.0%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 48.6 to 52.7
$0.0005
Counting (high)
64.9%
±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 63.5 to 66.2
$0.0003
59.0%
±5.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 52.7 to 63.5
$0.0016
Identification (low)
76.0%
±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 71.9 to 78.1
$0.0001
76.0%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 75.0 to 78.1
$0.0004
Identification (high)
82.3%
±4.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.1 to 87.5
$0.0003
78.1%
±4.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 71.9 to 81.3
$0.0012
OCR (low)
49.7%
$0.0004
48.6%
$0.0012
by category
Single value
41.7%
Transcription
72.5%
Structured JSON
68.6%
Text localization
9.2%
Single value
37.0%
Transcription
68.2%
Structured JSON
67.7%
Text localization
18.7%
OCR (high)
50.4%
$0.0012
49.9%
$0.0034
by category
Single value
42.2%
Transcription
68.9%
Structured JSON
69.2%
Text localization
13.2%
Single value
40.4%
Transcription
59.9%
Structured JSON
70.2%
Text localization
16.8%
Reasoning (low)
33.1%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 31.1 to 35.1
$0.0002
35.1%
±2.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 32.5 to 37.8
$0.0005
Reasoning (high)
58.5%
±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 57.0 to 59.6
$0.0008
55.9%
±2.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 54.3 to 58.9
$0.0026

MiMo V2.6 Flash vs MiMo V2.6 Pro: Overview

MiMo V2.6 Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the efficiency-oriented checkpoint of Xiaomi's MiMo-V2.6 series, a natively omnimodal foundation model that accepts text, image, video, and audio in a single model and supports a one million token context window. The language backbone is a sparse mixture-of-experts transformer with roughly 309 billion total parameters and 15 billion activated per token, organized as 48 layers with 256 routed experts and top-8 routing. It uses a hybrid attention scheme that interleaves sliding window attention with global attention layers to cut key-value cache cost on long sequences, and pairs the backbone with a vision encoder, an audio encoder, and an audio tokenizer, plus a multi-token prediction module and a draft model for faster decoding.

Training emphasizes large scale reinforcement learning on verifiable, long-horizon tasks, with RL compute, environment diversity, and grader compute scaled together in a single mixed run. Xiaomi reports gains during RL on SWE-bench Verified, Terminal Bench, a cybersecurity benchmark, and an internal visual coding benchmark, reflecting a focus on agentic coding, computer use, and multimodal document and screen understanding rather than single turn chat.

MiMo V2.6 Pro

MiMo V2.6 Pro is the flagship omni-modal foundation model in Xiaomi's MiMo V2.6 series, released as open weights alongside a Flash variant and a 9B distillation of Qwen3.5. It uses a sparse mixture-of-experts transformer with 1.02 trillion total parameters and roughly 42 billion activated per token, paired with a hybrid attention design that interleaves sliding-window and global attention layers to support a context window of about one million tokens. Dedicated encoders handle non-text inputs, including a vision encoder of roughly 681 million parameters and an audio tokenizer stack, so the model accepts text, images, video, and audio and returns text.

Post-training centers on large-scale reinforcement learning across thousands of interactive environments, combined with agentic grading, self-correction cold start, and a multi-prefix multi-teacher on-policy distillation stage that extends behavior to tasks that are hard to verify automatically. The resulting model targets long-horizon agentic work such as software engineering, terminal and computer-use operation, tool calling, cybersecurity analysis, and visual coding, and it reports gains over the prior MiMo generation on SWE-bench Verified, Terminal Bench, and internal visual coding and cyber benchmarks.