Llama 3.2 Vision 90b vs Muse Glimmer 30B
Compare Llama 3.2 Vision 90b and Muse Glimmer 30B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, OCR, Open Prompt, and Classification.
Compare Llama 3.2 Vision 90b vs Muse Glimmer 30B live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Compare image classification labels and confidence scores side-by-side.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Llama 3.2 Vision 90b is deprecated and can no longer be run. Details and evals are still available on its model page.
Models in this comparison
Llama 3.2 Vision 90b vs Muse Glimmer 30B Comparison Table
Evals updated August 20, 2026Pricing updated August 24, 2026
| Property | Llama 3.2 Vision 90b | Muse Glimmer 30B |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | Meta | Meta |
| Category | open | open |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Sep 2024 | Aug 2026 |
| Context Window | 128K | 131K |
| Parameters | 90B | 29.6B |
| License | Proprietary | Apache 2.0 |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $0.350 | |
| Output $/1M | $1.50 | |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Captioning | Demo | |
| Chart Question Answering | ||
| Classification | Demo | |
| Document Question Answering | ||
| Image Tagging | ||
| Multi-Label Classification | ||
| OCR | Demo | |
| Vision Language | ||
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | |
| Object Detection | Demo | |
| Model Features | ||
| Foundation Vision | ||
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | ||
| Multimodal Vision | ||
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort | ||
| Overall | Deprecated | 70.8% |
| Avg cost / sample | – | $0.0013 |
| Avg speed / sample | – | 8.70s |
| By task | ||
| Object Detection | – | 41.0% $0.0020 |
| Counting | – | 66.2% $0.0008 |
| Identification | – | 81.3% $0.0006 |
| OCR | – | 92.1% $0.0012 |
| Data Extraction | – | 86.6% $0.0007 |
| Reasoning (low) | – | 57.6% $0.0010 |
| Reasoning (high) | – | 62.9% $0.0033 |
Llama 3.2 Vision 90b vs Muse Glimmer 30B: Overview
Llama 3.2 Vision 90B, released by Meta AI on September 25, 2024, is the largest vision-capable model in the Llama 3.2 family. With about 90 billion parameters (~88.8B) and a 128,000-token context window, it is designed for high-performance multimodal reasoning over images and text, while producing only text outputs. The model was trained on ~6 billion image–text pairs and instruction-tuned (SFT + RLHF), with a knowledge cutoff of December 2023.
It powers tasks like visual question answering, captioning, and image-grounded reasoning, and achieves strong benchmark performance compared to both open and proprietary models. The model officially supports English for multimodal (image+text) tasks, while text-only inputs extend to eight languages (including German, French, Hindi, and Spanish). Due to its large parameter size, it requires substantial compute resources but is accessible via cloud providers like Amazon Bedrock, Oracle Cloud, and Azure AI Foundry. While highly capable, it is limited to text-only outputs and has stricter multilingual support for vision-based inputs.
Muse Glimmer 30B is a dense vision language model from Meta built for long-horizon agentic work on local hardware. The architecture pairs a 52-layer causal text decoder with a roughly 1.8B parameter ViT-G/14 perception encoder for about 29.6 billion parameters in total, and it accepts interleaved text and image input so an agent can interpret screenshots, charts, and documents alongside conversation. The decoder uses grouped-query attention with 32 query heads and 2 key-value heads, a repeating pattern of three sliding-window local attention layers followed by one global layer, SwiGLU feed-forward blocks, and rotary position embeddings applied on the local layers, supporting a trained context of 131,072 tokens.
Meta describes the model as distilled from the larger Muse Spark and trained and evaluated around agentic behavior: end-to-end task completion, schema-accurate tool calling, multi-step reasoning across extended workflows, and recovery when a tool call returns an unexpected result. Reasoning effort is selectable across low, medium, high, and xhigh settings, and the model emits channel-scoped reasoning traces together with XML style tool calls rather than JSON, which requires parsers specific to this family. A companion block-diffusion drafter head predicts blocks of 16 tokens per forward pass for speculative decoding, with the main model verifying the proposals in parallel.