Roboflow

Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Compare Muse Glimmer 30B and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, Open Prompt, and OCR.

Compare Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
MetaMuse Glimmer 30B
Run to compare this model.
QwenQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct on Vision Evals

Muse Glimmer 30B scores higher on 3 of the six Vision Evals tasks.

The widest gap is Reasoning, where Muse Glimmer 30B leads 57.6% to 29.8%.

Overall, Muse Glimmer 30B averages 70.8% (#14 of 28) against 65.8% (#22 of 28) for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct.

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is cheaper ($0.0006 vs $0.0013 per sample), while Muse Glimmer 30B is faster (8.7s vs 9.2s per sample).

Muse Glimmer 30BQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct Comparison Table

Evals updated August 12, 2026Pricing updated August 13, 2026

PropertyMuse Glimmer 30BQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
OrganizationMetaQwen
Categoryopenopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateAug 2026Sep 2025
Context Window131K256K
Parameters29.6B235B
LicenseApache 2.0Apache 2.0
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.350$0.260
Output $/1M$1.50$1.04
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Chart Question Answering
ClassificationDemo
Document Question Answering
Image Tagging
Multi-Label Classification
Object DetectionDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Model Features
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
70.8%
65.8%
Avg cost / sample$0.0013$0.0006
Avg speed / sample8.70s9.17s
By task
Object Detection
41.0%
$0.0020
52.1%
$0.0011
Counting
66.2%
$0.0008
47.3%
$0.0003
Identification
81.3%
$0.0006
90.6%
$0.0003
OCR
92.1%
$0.0012
88.1%
$0.0007
Data Extraction
86.6%
$0.0007
86.6%
$0.0003
Reasoning (low)
57.6%
$0.0010
29.8%
$0.0003
Reasoning (high)
33.8%
$0.0003

Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct: Overview

Muse Glimmer 30B

Muse Glimmer 30B is a dense vision language model from Meta built for long-horizon agentic work on local hardware. The architecture pairs a 52-layer causal text decoder with a roughly 1.8B parameter ViT-G/14 perception encoder for about 29.6 billion parameters in total, and it accepts interleaved text and image input so an agent can interpret screenshots, charts, and documents alongside conversation. The decoder uses grouped-query attention with 32 query heads and 2 key-value heads, a repeating pattern of three sliding-window local attention layers followed by one global layer, SwiGLU feed-forward blocks, and rotary position embeddings applied on the local layers, supporting a trained context of 131,072 tokens.

Meta describes the model as distilled from the larger Muse Spark and trained and evaluated around agentic behavior: end-to-end task completion, schema-accurate tool calling, multi-step reasoning across extended workflows, and recovery when a tool call returns an unexpected result. Reasoning effort is selectable across low, medium, high, and xhigh settings, and the model emits channel-scoped reasoning traces together with XML style tool calls rather than JSON, which requires parsers specific to this family. A companion block-diffusion drafter head predicts blocks of 16 tokens per forward pass for speculative decoding, with the main model verifying the proposals in parallel.

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is a flagship multimodal vision-language model developed by Qwen (Alibaba Cloud), designed for instruction-following tasks that combine advanced text generation with visual understanding. It serves as a high-end open-weight model for developers and researchers building multimodal AI systems that require strong reasoning, perception, and long-context capabilities.

The model supports interleaved text and image inputs, very long context windows (up to roughly 256K tokens), and efficient inference through a mixture-of-experts architecture with about 22B active parameters out of 235B total. In today’s landscape, it competes with top-tier proprietary vision-language models while offering the advantages of open weights and flexible deployment. Typical applications include multimodal assistants, document and image analysis, visual reasoning, and large-context instruction-based workflows.