Kimi K2.5 vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B

Compare Kimi K2.5 and Qwen3.5 122B A10B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, OCR, and Open Prompt.

Compare Kimi K2.5 vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
MoonshotAIKimi K2.5
Run to compare this model.
QwenQwen3.5 122B A10B
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

MoonshotAI

Kimi K2.5 vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B: Overview

Kimi K2.5

Kimi K2.5 is a frontier-scale multimodal AI model developed by Moonshot AI and released on January 27, 2026. As a significant advancement within the Kimi K2 family, it utilizes a sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture with 1 trillion total parameters (32 billion active per inference) and a massive 256K-token context window. The model features native multimodal integration via a 400M-parameter MoonViT encoder, allowing it to process text, images, and video frames simultaneously. Built for both speed and depth, it offers "Instant" and "Thinking" modes, the latter of which excels at expert-level reasoning, scoring 50.2% on the Humanity’s Last Exam (HLE) benchmark when equipped with tools.

The model is released under a Modified MIT License, which remains open-weight but requires attribution for high-revenue commercial entities. It introduces an "Agent Swarm" paradigm capable of coordinating up to 100 specialized sub-agents for parallel workflows, significantly reducing latency in complex research tasks. For vision tasks, Kimi K2.5 demonstrates strong autonomous visual debugging capabilities, where it can inspect its own generated UI outputs against visual specifications to iteratively refine frontend code. This makes it a powerful choice for developers testing automated UI reconstruction, high-fidelity OCR document processing, and multi-step agentic research grounded in complex visual data.

Qwen3.5 122B A10B

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is a high-capacity multimodal Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model developed by Alibaba’s Qwen team as part of the Qwen3.5 model family. The architecture contains 122 billion total parameters while activating roughly 10 billion per token through sparse expert routing, allowing the model to balance large-scale reasoning ability with relatively efficient inference compared to dense models of similar size.

The model is designed to process both text and visual inputs within a unified multimodal framework, enabling tasks that require reasoning across images, documents, charts, and natural language. This makes it suitable for applications such as document understanding, diagram interpretation, and complex visual question answering.

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B supports a native context window of approximately 256,000 tokens, which can be extended further through techniques such as YaRN scaling to support very long-context workloads. Released under the Apache 2.0 license, it builds on earlier Qwen multimodal systems and provides developers with an open-weight model capable of handling demanding multimodal reasoning and analysis tasks.

Kimi K2.5 vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B Comparison Table

PropertyKimi K2.5Qwen3.5 122B A10B
OrganizationMoonshot AIQwen
Categoryopenopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateJan 2026Feb 2026
Context Window256K256K
Parameters1T122B
LicenseModified MITApache 2.0
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.375$0.260
Output $/1M$2.02$2.08
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Object Detection
Model Features
Multimodal Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Overall Score
35.82%
76.12%
Avg Response Time14.81s1.77s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens1.6K1.2K
Median output tokens7667
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0021$0.0003
Defect Detection
46.7%(7/15)
86.7%(13/15)
Document Understanding
55.6%(5/9)
77.8%(7/9)
Object Counting
10%(1/10)
40%(4/10)
Object Understanding
42.9%(6/14)
92.9%(13/14)
Spatial Understanding
26.3%(5/19)
73.7%(14/19)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology