GPT-5 Nano vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Compare GPT-5 Nano and Qwen3.5 397B A17B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, OCR, and Open Prompt.

Compare GPT-5 Nano vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
OpenAIGPT-5 Nano
Run to compare this model.
QwenQwen3.5 397B A17B
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

GPT-5 Nano vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B: Overview

GPT-5 Nano

GPT-5 Nano, released by OpenAI on August 7, 2025, is the smallest and most cost-efficient model in the GPT-5 family. Like its larger counterparts, it is multimodal—accepting text and images, supporting tool use, structured outputs, and reasoning—but it is optimized for speed, low latency, and affordability. It features input and output token limits of roughly 272K and 128K tokens respectively, enabling large-context processing even at its compact scale. Its knowledge cutoff is around May 2024, slightly earlier than the full GPT-5 model.

GPT-5 Nano is well-suited for high-volume or cost-sensitive deployments such as mobile apps, embedded AI systems, or rapid-response APIs. While it offers less depth on complex reasoning and coding tasks compared to GPT-5 Mini or Pro, it retains core multimodal and agentic capabilities, making it an attractive option where efficiency and scale matter more than maximum performance.

Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is a 397B-parameter (17B active) open-weight multimodal model developed by Alibaba’s Qwen team, released on 2026-02-16 under Apache-2.0. It supports text and image inputs with text outputs, combining a sparse Mixture-of-Experts architecture with Gated Delta Networks for efficient scaling. The model provides native vision-language reasoning and a large ~262K token context window, extendable to ~1M tokens.

As the first open-weight release in the Qwen3.5 family, it positions itself as a high-capacity, long-context alternative in the large vision-language space, balancing scale and efficiency via sparse activation. It is designed for advanced reasoning, coding, agent workflows, and multimodal understanding tasks.

GPT-5 Nano vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B Comparison Table

PropertyGPT-5 NanoQwen3.5 397B A17B
OrganizationOpenAIQwen
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateAug 2025Feb 2026
Context Window400K262K
Parameters397B
LicenseProprietaryApache 2.0
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.050$0.385
Output $/1M$0.400$2.45
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Object DetectionDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
ClassificationDemo
Model Features
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Foundation Vision
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
58.21%
58.21%
Avg Response Time6.58s56.61s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens1.8K1.1K
Median output tokens59154
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0003$0.0006
Defect Detection
86.7%(13/15)
66.7%(10/15)
Document Understanding
66.7%(6/9)
77.8%(7/9)
Object Counting
0%(0/10)
20%(2/10)
Object Understanding
64.3%(9/14)
64.3%(9/14)
Spatial Understanding
57.9%(11/19)
57.9%(11/19)
OCR
Overall Score
69%
68.56%
Avg Response Time6.15s7.45s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens122122
Median output tokens53920
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0002$0.0001
Focused Scene OCR
64.6%(64/99)
57.6%(57/99)
Handwritten Math
40%(4/10)
80%(8/10)
License Plate Recognition
83.3%(25/30)
100%(30/30)
Text Recognition
70%(21/30)
70%(21/30)
VQA & Extraction
73.3%(44/60)
68.3%(41/60)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology