Roboflow

GPT-5.4 Nano vs GPT-5 Nano

Compare GPT-5.4 Nano and GPT-5 Nano side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in OCR, Image Captioning, Classification, Object Detection, and Open Prompt.

Compare GPT-5.4 Nano vs GPT-5 Nano live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
OpenAIGPT-5.4 Nano
Run to compare this model.
OpenAIGPT-5 Nano
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

GPT-5.4 Nano vs GPT-5 Nano: Overview

GPT-5.4 Nano

GPT-5.4 nano is a high-throughput model developed by OpenAI and released on March 17, 2026, as the efficiency-optimized entry in the GPT-5.4 family. Engineered for cost-sensitive production environments and latency-critical workloads, it features an expanded 400,000-token context window that enables the processing of large document batches or extensive logs in a single pass. The model is primarily optimized for text-heavy operations, serving as a premier engine for high-volume classification, data extraction, ranking, and the orchestration of lightweight sub-agents where speed and low per-token costs are the primary requirements.

While it supports text and image inputs, GPT-5.4 nano is designed as a text-first worker rather than a specialized visual reasoning tool. In multi-model architectures, it is best utilized for structured text tasks and simple coding sub-tasks, leaving intensive vision reasoning and UI navigation to its sibling, GPT-5.4 mini. Compared to the previous GPT-5 nano, this version provides a significant leap in reliability for structured outputs and tool calling, making it a dependable and economical choice for developers building scalable, automated pipelines that require rapid execution at the edge of the GPT-5.4 ecosystem.

GPT-5 Nano

GPT-5 Nano, released by OpenAI on August 7, 2025, is the smallest and most cost-efficient model in the GPT-5 family. Like its larger counterparts, it is multimodal—accepting text and images, supporting tool use, structured outputs, and reasoning—but it is optimized for speed, low latency, and affordability. It features input and output token limits of roughly 272K and 128K tokens respectively, enabling large-context processing even at its compact scale. Its knowledge cutoff is around May 2024, slightly earlier than the full GPT-5 model.

GPT-5 Nano is well-suited for high-volume or cost-sensitive deployments such as mobile apps, embedded AI systems, or rapid-response APIs. While it offers less depth on complex reasoning and coding tasks compared to GPT-5 Mini or Pro, it retains core multimodal and agentic capabilities, making it an attractive option where efficiency and scale matter more than maximum performance.

GPT-5.4 Nano vs GPT-5 Nano Comparison Table

PropertyGPT-5.4 NanoGPT-5 Nano
OrganizationOpenAIOpenAI
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateMar 2026Aug 2025
Context Window400K400K
Parameters
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.200$0.050
Output $/1M$1.25$0.400
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
ClassificationDemoDemo
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Model Features
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
62.69%
58.21%
Avg Response Time3.72s6.58s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens1.4K1.8K
Median output tokens105591
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0004$0.0003
Defect Detection
80%(12/15)
86.7%(13/15)
Document Understanding
77.8%(7/9)
66.7%(6/9)
Object Counting
30%(3/10)
0%(0/10)
Object Understanding
64.3%(9/14)
64.3%(9/14)
Spatial Understanding
57.9%(11/19)
57.9%(11/19)
OCR
Overall Score
62.45%
69%
Avg Response Time2.59s6.15s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens105122
Median output tokens87539
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0001$0.0002
Focused Scene OCR
55.6%(55/99)
64.6%(64/99)
Handwritten Math
20%(2/10)
40%(4/10)
License Plate Recognition
83.3%(25/30)
83.3%(25/30)
Text Recognition
70%(21/30)
70%(21/30)
VQA & Extraction
66.7%(40/60)
73.3%(44/60)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology