GPT-5 Nano vs Kimi K2.5

Compare GPT-5 Nano and Kimi K2.5 side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, OCR, and Open Prompt.

Compare GPT-5 Nano vs Kimi K2.5 live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
OpenAIGPT-5 Nano
Run to compare this model.
MoonshotAIKimi K2.5
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

MoonshotAI

GPT-5 Nano vs Kimi K2.5: Overview

GPT-5 Nano

GPT-5 Nano, released by OpenAI on August 7, 2025, is the smallest and most cost-efficient model in the GPT-5 family. Like its larger counterparts, it is multimodal—accepting text and images, supporting tool use, structured outputs, and reasoning—but it is optimized for speed, low latency, and affordability. It features input and output token limits of roughly 272K and 128K tokens respectively, enabling large-context processing even at its compact scale. Its knowledge cutoff is around May 2024, slightly earlier than the full GPT-5 model.

GPT-5 Nano is well-suited for high-volume or cost-sensitive deployments such as mobile apps, embedded AI systems, or rapid-response APIs. While it offers less depth on complex reasoning and coding tasks compared to GPT-5 Mini or Pro, it retains core multimodal and agentic capabilities, making it an attractive option where efficiency and scale matter more than maximum performance.

Kimi K2.5

Kimi K2.5 is a frontier-scale multimodal AI model developed by Moonshot AI and released on January 27, 2026. As a significant advancement within the Kimi K2 family, it utilizes a sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture with 1 trillion total parameters (32 billion active per inference) and a massive 256K-token context window. The model features native multimodal integration via a 400M-parameter MoonViT encoder, allowing it to process text, images, and video frames simultaneously. Built for both speed and depth, it offers "Instant" and "Thinking" modes, the latter of which excels at expert-level reasoning, scoring 50.2% on the Humanity’s Last Exam (HLE) benchmark when equipped with tools.

The model is released under a Modified MIT License, which remains open-weight but requires attribution for high-revenue commercial entities. It introduces an "Agent Swarm" paradigm capable of coordinating up to 100 specialized sub-agents for parallel workflows, significantly reducing latency in complex research tasks. For vision tasks, Kimi K2.5 demonstrates strong autonomous visual debugging capabilities, where it can inspect its own generated UI outputs against visual specifications to iteratively refine frontend code. This makes it a powerful choice for developers testing automated UI reconstruction, high-fidelity OCR document processing, and multi-step agentic research grounded in complex visual data.

GPT-5 Nano vs Kimi K2.5 Comparison Table

PropertyGPT-5 NanoKimi K2.5
OrganizationOpenAIMoonshot AI
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateAug 2025Jan 2026
Context Window400K256K
Parameters1T
LicenseProprietaryModified MIT
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.050$0.375
Output $/1M$0.400$2.02
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
ClassificationDemo
Object DetectionDemo
Model Features
Multimodal Vision
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
58.21%
35.82%
Avg Response Time6.58s14.81s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens1.8K1.6K
Median output tokens591766
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0003$0.0021
Defect Detection
86.7%(13/15)
46.7%(7/15)
Document Understanding
66.7%(6/9)
55.6%(5/9)
Object Counting
0%(0/10)
10%(1/10)
Object Understanding
64.3%(9/14)
42.9%(6/14)
Spatial Understanding
57.9%(11/19)
26.3%(5/19)
OCR
Overall Score
69%
19.65%
Avg Response Time6.15s13.09s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens122119
Median output tokens539258
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0002$0.0006
Focused Scene OCR
64.6%(64/99)
10.1%(10/99)
Handwritten Math
40%(4/10)
50%(5/10)
License Plate Recognition
83.3%(25/30)
6.7%(2/30)
Text Recognition
70%(21/30)
26.7%(8/30)
VQA & Extraction
73.3%(44/60)
33.3%(20/60)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology