Roboflow

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Muse Glimmer 30B

Compare GPT-5.6 Sol and Muse Glimmer 30B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in OCR, Image Captioning, Object Detection, Open Prompt, and Classification.

Compare GPT-5.6 Sol vs Muse Glimmer 30B live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
OpenAIGPT-5.6 Sol
Run to compare this model.
MetaMuse Glimmer 30B
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Muse Glimmer 30B on Vision Evals

GPT-5.6 Sol scores higher on all five Vision Evals tasks.

The widest gap is Object Detection, where GPT-5.6 Sol leads 68.4% to 41.0%.

Overall, GPT-5.6 Sol averages 72.4% (#16 of 61) against 61.4% (#32 of 61) for Muse Glimmer 30B.

Muse Glimmer 30B is both cheaper ($0.0013 vs $0.0096 per sample) and faster (10.6s vs 12.2s per sample).

GPT-5.6 SolMuse Glimmer 30B

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Muse Glimmer 30B Comparison Table

Evals updated October 8, 2026Pricing updated October 9, 2026

PropertyGPT-5.6 SolMuse Glimmer 30B
OrganizationOpenAIMeta
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateJul 2026Aug 2026
Context Window1.5M131K
ParametersUnknown29.6B
LicenseProprietaryApache 2.0
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$2.00$0.300
Output $/1M$10.00$1.20
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Chart Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
ClassificationDemoDemo
Document Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
Image TaggingSupportedSupported
Multi-Label ClassificationSupportedSupported
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision LanguageSupportedSupported
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Model Features
Foundation VisionSupportedSupported
LLMs with Vision CapabilitiesSupportedSupported
Multimodal VisionSupportedSupported
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
72.4%
61.4%
Avg cost / sample$0.0096$0.0013
Avg speed / sample12.16s10.60s
By task
Object Detection (low)
68.4%
±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 67.9 to 69.3
$0.015
41.0%
$0.0017
Object Detection (high)
68.4%
±0.8, Mean of 3 runs, range 67.7 to 69.3
$0.035
–
Counting (low)
74.3%
±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 73.0 to 75.7
$0.0049
66.2%
$0.0007
Counting (high)
76.1%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 74.3 to 78.4
$0.0078
–
Identification (low)
89.6%
±4.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 84.4 to 93.8
$0.0028
81.3%
$0.0005
Identification (high)
92.7%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 90.6 to 93.8
$0.0030
–
OCR (low)
63.6%
$0.0095
60.7%
$0.0013
by category
Single value
43.5%
Transcription
91.7%
Structured JSON
82.0%
Text localization
52.2%
Single value
54.4%
Transcription
82.9%
Structured JSON
80.2%
Text localization
14.8%
OCR (high)
65.3%
$0.024
60.1%
$0.0033
by category
Single value
46.1%
Transcription
92.3%
Structured JSON
83.9%
Text localization
51.6%
Single value
54.4%
Transcription
78.4%
Structured JSON
80.0%
Text localization
13.7%
Reasoning (low)
66.0%
±2.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 63.6 to 68.9
$0.0043
57.6%
$0.0009
Reasoning (high)
71.7%
±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 70.2 to 72.8
$0.0061
62.9%
$0.0026

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Muse Glimmer 30B: Overview

GPT-5.6 Sol

GPT-5.6 Sol is the flagship model in OpenAI's GPT-5.6 family, which also includes Terra (a balanced everyday-work tier) and Luna (a fast, cost-efficient tier). Sol is designed for demanding reasoning, long-horizon agentic workflows, software engineering, computer use, scientific research, and cybersecurity tasks. It introduces two new capability modes: a "max" reasoning effort setting that allocates additional compute time for difficult problems, and an "ultra" mode that coordinates multiple subagents in parallel to accelerate complex, multi-step work. The model supports native multimodal input, allowing it to process screenshots, diagrams, charts, documents, and photographs alongside text. A reported context window of approximately 1.5 million tokens enables processing of large codebases, lengthy research documents, and extended agentic sessions.

GPT-5.6 Sol was announced on June 26, 2026, initially in a limited preview for trusted partners, and reached general availability on July 9, 2026. On the Agents' Last Exam benchmark, which evaluates long-running professional workflows across 55 fields, Sol scores 53.6. On Terminal-Bench 2.1, which tests command-line agentic coding workflows, Sol Ultra achieves 91.9%. The model also demonstrates gains in life sciences evaluations, including long-horizon genomics and quantitative biology analyses. OpenAI paired the release with its most extensive safety evaluation to date, combining human red teaming with large-scale automated testing, and classified Sol as High capability in both cybersecurity and biological risk under its Preparedness Framework, though it does not cross the Critical threshold in either category.

Muse Glimmer 30B

Muse Glimmer 30B is a dense vision language model from Meta built for long-horizon agentic work on local hardware. The architecture pairs a 52-layer causal text decoder with a roughly 1.8B parameter ViT-G/14 perception encoder for about 29.6 billion parameters in total, and it accepts interleaved text and image input so an agent can interpret screenshots, charts, and documents alongside conversation. The decoder uses grouped-query attention with 32 query heads and 2 key-value heads, a repeating pattern of three sliding-window local attention layers followed by one global layer, SwiGLU feed-forward blocks, and rotary position embeddings applied on the local layers, supporting a trained context of 131,072 tokens.

Meta describes the model as distilled from the larger Muse Spark and trained and evaluated around agentic behavior: end-to-end task completion, schema-accurate tool calling, multi-step reasoning across extended workflows, and recovery when a tool call returns an unexpected result. Reasoning effort is selectable across low, medium, high, and xhigh settings, and the model emits channel-scoped reasoning traces together with XML style tool calls rather than JSON, which requires parsers specific to this family. A companion block-diffusion drafter head predicts blocks of 16 tokens per forward pass for speculative decoding, with the main model verifying the proposals in parallel.

Frequently Asked Questions

On Roboflow's Vision Evals, GPT-5.6 Sol performed better. It scores higher on all five vision tasks and averages 72.4% (#16 of 61) against 61.4% (#32 of 61) for Muse Glimmer 30B. These scores measure vision capabilities only; either model may perform differently on work outside this benchmark's tasks.

Yes. On the Vision Evals Object Detection benchmark at low effort, GPT-5.6 Sol leads with 68.4% against 41.0%. This is the widest gap between the two models across the benchmark's tasks.

Muse Glimmer 30B is cheaper to run. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals task mix it averaged $0.0013 per sample against $0.0096. GPT-5.6 Sol is priced at $2.00 per 1M input tokens and $10.00 per 1M output; Muse Glimmer 30B is priced at $0.30 per 1M input tokens and $1.20 per 1M output. Actual costs depend on your image sizes, prompts, and output length.

Muse Glimmer 30B is faster. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals it averaged 10.6s per inference against 12.2s. Latency varies with image size, prompt length, and provider load, so treat these as relative rather than guaranteed figures.

Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for OCR and image captioning in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.