Roboflow

GPT-5.6 Luna vs Qwen3.5-27B

Compare GPT-5.6 Luna and Qwen3.5-27B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Classification, Image Captioning, OCR, Object Detection, and Open Prompt.

Compare GPT-5.6 Luna vs Qwen3.5-27B live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
OpenAIGPT-5.6 Luna
Run to compare this model.
QwenQwen3.5-27B
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

GPT-5.6 Luna vs Qwen3.5-27B on Vision Evals

GPT-5.6 Luna scores higher on 3 of the 4 Vision Evals tasks.

The widest gap is Object Detection, where GPT-5.6 Luna leads 61.0% to 50.5%.

Overall, GPT-5.6 Luna averages 64.7% (#29 of 63) against 64.1% (#30 of 63) for Qwen3.5-27B.

GPT-5.6 Luna is both cheaper ($0.0011 vs $0.0043 per sample) and faster (8.6s vs 80.4s per sample).

GPT-5.6 LunaQwen3.5-27B

GPT-5.6 Luna vs Qwen3.5-27B Comparison Table

Evals updated October 13, 2026Pricing updated October 18, 2026

PropertyGPT-5.6 LunaQwen3.5-27B
OrganizationOpenAIQwen
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateJul 2026Feb 2026
Context Window1.5M262K
ParametersUnknown27B
LicenseProprietaryApache 2.0
Commercial usecommercial use per vendor termsfree for commercial use
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.200$0.260
Output $/1M$1.20$2.60
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Chart Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
ClassificationDemoDemo
Document Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
Image TaggingSupportedSupported
Multi-Label ClassificationSupportedSupported
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision LanguageSupportedSupported
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Model Features
Foundation VisionSupportedSupported
LLMs with Vision CapabilitiesSupportedSupported
Multimodal VisionSupportedSupported
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
64.7%
64.1%
4/5 tasks
Quantizationsself-hosted
BF1664.1%FP860.9%AWQ-INT461.2%hardware →
Avg cost / sample$0.0011$0.0043
Avg speed / sample8.60s80.37s
By task
Object Detection (low)
61.0%
±1.2, Mean of 3 runs, range 59.9 to 62.2
$0.0015
50.5%
±3.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 46.1 to 53.0
$0
Object Detection (high)
62.3%
±1.2, Mean of 3 runs, range 61.4 to 63.8
$0.0050
–
Counting (low)
67.1%
±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 66.2 to 68.9
$0.0006
67.6%
±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 66.2 to 68.9
$0
Counting (high)
70.7%
±3.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 66.2 to 73.0
$0.0015
–
Identification (low)
83.3%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.3 to 84.4
$0.0004
80.2%
±4.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 75.0 to 84.4
$0
Identification (high)
84.4%
±6.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.1 to 90.6
$0.0007
–
OCR (low)
51.8%
$0.0011
–
by category
Single value
29.6%
Transcription
75.5%
Structured JSON
73.6%
Text localization
39.7%
OCR (high)
55.7%
$0.0041
–
by category
Single value
33.0%
Transcription
83.5%
Structured JSON
77.0%
Text localization
43.8%
Reasoning (low)
60.5%
±5.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 55.0 to 64.9
$0.0006
58.1%
±2.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 55.6 to 60.3
$0
Reasoning (high)
65.6%
±3.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 60.9 to 68.2
$0.0015
–

GPT-5.6 Luna vs Qwen3.5-27B: Overview

GPT-5.6 Luna

GPT-5.6 Luna is the fastest and most cost-efficient model in OpenAI's GPT-5.6 family, which also includes Sol (the flagship tier) and Terra (the balanced mid-tier). Introduced under a new naming convention where the generation number (5.6) and a durable capability tier name (Luna, Terra, Sol) together define each model, Luna occupies the lightweight end of the family and is designed for high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads such as summarization, drafting, autocomplete, classification, and routine automation. The GPT-5.6 family as a whole advances capabilities in software engineering, computer use, professional knowledge work, scientific research, and cybersecurity, with all three tiers rated at the "High" capability level under OpenAI's Preparedness Framework for both cybersecurity and biological/chemical risk domains.

GPT-5.6 Luna supports multimodal input and function calling, and shares the family's 1.5 million token context window. On Terminal-Bench 2.1, Luna scores 82.5%, and on the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index it outperforms comparable models at roughly one-quarter the estimated cost of higher-tier alternatives. Luna supports the GPT-5.6 prompt caching scheme, which introduces explicit cache breakpoints and a 30-minute minimum cache life. The model was previewed on June 26, 2026 to a limited group of trusted partners via the OpenAI API and Codex, with general availability rolling out on July 9, 2026 across ChatGPT, Codex, and the API.

Qwen3.5-27B

Qwen3.5-27B is a multimodal dense hybrid model developed by Alibaba Cloud’s Qwen team and released in February 2026 as a high-precision entry in the Qwen3.5 "Medium" series. Unlike its Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) siblings, the 27B model utilizes a dense architecture combining Gated Delta Networks with a feed-forward structure, activating its full parameter suite for every inference to maximize reliability. This design provides the highest instruction-following and coding accuracy in its class, with a notable IFEval score of 95.0. The model features a native 262K-token context window, extensible to 1M tokens via YaRN (RoPE scaling), and is released under the Apache-2.0 license.

Optimized for agentic workflows, Qwen3.5-27B employs an early-fusion architecture that treats visual and textual data as a unified stream for deep cross-modal reasoning. This unified approach allows the model to excel in technical analysis and software engineering, matching GPT-5-mini with a 72.4% score on SWE-bench Verified. While the larger MoE variants in the family lead in raw knowledge benchmarks, the 27B model offers a stable and high-density alternative for structured data extraction and spatial perception, contributing to the Qwen3.5 family’s generational leap in OCR accuracy over the previous Qwen3-VL series.