Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs GPT-5.6 Luna
Compare Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite and GPT-5.6 Luna side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Object Detection, Classification, Image Captioning, Open Prompt, and OCR.
Compare Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs GPT-5.6 Luna live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Models in this comparison
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs GPT-5.6 Luna Comparison Table
Evals updated September 5, 2026Pricing updated September 13, 2026
| Property | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | GPT-5.6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | OpenAI | |
| Category | closed | closed |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Mar 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Context Window | 1.0M | 1.5M |
| Parameters | ||
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $0.250 | $0.200 |
| Output $/1M | $1.50 | $1.20 |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Captioning | Demo | Demo |
| Chart Question Answering | ||
| Classification | Demo | Demo |
| Document Question Answering | ||
| Image Tagging | ||
| Multi-Label Classification | ||
| Object Detection | Demo | Demo |
| OCR | Demo | Demo |
| Vision Language | ||
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | Demo |
| Model Features | ||
| Foundation Vision | ||
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | ||
| Multimodal Vision | ||
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort | ||
| Overall | Not evaluated | 73.8% |
| Avg cost / sample | – | $0.0010 |
| Avg speed / sample | – | 7.38s |
| By task | ||
| Object Detection (low) | – | 61.0% ±1.2, Mean of 3 runs, range 59.9 to 62.2 |
| Object Detection (high) | – | 62.3% ±1.2, Mean of 3 runs, range 61.4 to 63.8 |
| Counting (low) | – | 67.1% ±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 66.2 to 68.9 |
| Counting (high) | – | 70.7% ±3.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 66.2 to 73.0 |
| Identification (low) | – | 83.3% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.3 to 84.4 |
| Identification (high) | – | 84.4% ±6.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.1 to 90.6 |
| OCR (low) | – | 90.7% ±1.8, Mean of 3 runs, range 88.4 to 92.0 |
| OCR (high) | – | 91.5% ±0.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 91.2 to 91.7 |
| Data Extraction (low) | – | 80.4% ±2.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.3 to 82.5 |
| Data Extraction (high) | – | 81.8% ±0.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.4 to 82.5 |
| Reasoning (low) | – | 60.5% ±5.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 55.0 to 64.9 |
| Reasoning (high) | – | 65.6% ±3.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 60.9 to 68.2 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs GPT-5.6 Luna: Overview
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is a natively multimodal reasoning model from Google DeepMind in the Gemini 3 series, based on the Gemini 3 Pro architecture. It processes text, image, video, audio, and PDF inputs within a 1 million token context window and produces text output up to 64K tokens. The model targets high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads and supports visual question answering, image and document data extraction, content moderation, classification, translation, automated speech recognition, and agentic data pipelines. It exposes configurable thinking levels of minimal, low, medium, and high, which set the depth of internal reasoning applied per request and let developers balance response quality against cost and latency.
On benchmarks reported at launch, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite scores 86.9% on GPQA Diamond and 76.8% on the MMMU Pro multimodal benchmark, and reaches an Elo score of 1432 on the Arena.ai leaderboard. According to Artificial Analysis benchmarks, it produces a 2.5 times faster time to first answer token and a 45% increase in output speed relative to Gemini 2.5 Flash. It also shows improved instruction following, higher audio input quality for automated speech recognition tasks, and support for structured JSON output used in data extraction pipelines.
GPT-5.6 Luna is the fastest and most cost-efficient model in OpenAI's GPT-5.6 family, which also includes Sol (the flagship tier) and Terra (the balanced mid-tier). Introduced under a new naming convention where the generation number (5.6) and a durable capability tier name (Luna, Terra, Sol) together define each model, Luna occupies the lightweight end of the family and is designed for high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads such as summarization, drafting, autocomplete, classification, and routine automation. The GPT-5.6 family as a whole advances capabilities in software engineering, computer use, professional knowledge work, scientific research, and cybersecurity, with all three tiers rated at the "High" capability level under OpenAI's Preparedness Framework for both cybersecurity and biological/chemical risk domains.
GPT-5.6 Luna supports multimodal input and function calling, and shares the family's 1.5 million token context window. On Terminal-Bench 2.1, Luna scores 82.5%, and on the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index it outperforms comparable models at roughly one-quarter the estimated cost of higher-tier alternatives. Luna is priced at $1 per million input tokens and $6 per million output tokens, with cached input reads at $0.10 per million tokens under the GPT-5.6 prompt caching scheme, which introduces explicit cache breakpoints and a 30-minute minimum cache life. The model was previewed on June 26, 2026 to a limited group of trusted partners via the OpenAI API and Codex, with general availability rolling out on July 9, 2026 across ChatGPT, Codex, and the API.
Frequently Asked Questions
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite has not yet been evaluated on Roboflow's current Vision Evals, so this comparison shows specs, licensing, and pricing rather than benchmark scores.
Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for object detection and image classification in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.