Roboflow

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs GPT-5.6 Luna

Compare Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite and GPT-5.6 Luna side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Object Detection, Classification, Image Captioning, Open Prompt, and OCR.

Compare Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs GPT-5.6 Luna live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
GoogleGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Run to compare this model.
OpenAIGPT-5.6 Luna
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs GPT-5.6 Luna: Overview

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is a natively multimodal reasoning model from Google DeepMind in the Gemini 3 series, based on the Gemini 3 Pro architecture. It processes text, image, video, audio, and PDF inputs within a 1 million token context window and produces text output up to 64K tokens. The model targets high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads and supports visual question answering, image and document data extraction, content moderation, classification, translation, automated speech recognition, and agentic data pipelines. It exposes configurable thinking levels of minimal, low, medium, and high, which set the depth of internal reasoning applied per request and let developers balance response quality against cost and latency.

On benchmarks reported at launch, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite scores 86.9% on GPQA Diamond and 76.8% on the MMMU Pro multimodal benchmark, and reaches an Elo score of 1432 on the Arena.ai leaderboard. According to Artificial Analysis benchmarks, it produces a 2.5 times faster time to first answer token and a 45% increase in output speed relative to Gemini 2.5 Flash. It also shows improved instruction following, higher audio input quality for automated speech recognition tasks, and support for structured JSON output used in data extraction pipelines.

GPT-5.6 Luna

GPT-5.6 Luna is the fastest and most cost-efficient model in OpenAI's GPT-5.6 family, which also includes Sol (the flagship tier) and Terra (the balanced mid-tier). Introduced under a new naming convention where the generation number (5.6) and a durable capability tier name (Luna, Terra, Sol) together define each model, Luna occupies the lightweight end of the family and is designed for high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads such as summarization, drafting, autocomplete, classification, and routine automation. The GPT-5.6 family as a whole advances capabilities in software engineering, computer use, professional knowledge work, scientific research, and cybersecurity, with all three tiers rated at the "High" capability level under OpenAI's Preparedness Framework for both cybersecurity and biological/chemical risk domains.

GPT-5.6 Luna supports multimodal input and function calling, and shares the family's 1.5 million token context window. On Terminal-Bench 2.1, Luna scores 82.5%, and on the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index it outperforms comparable models at roughly one-quarter the estimated cost of higher-tier alternatives. Luna is priced at $1 per million input tokens and $6 per million output tokens, with cached input reads at $0.10 per million tokens under the GPT-5.6 prompt caching scheme, which introduces explicit cache breakpoints and a 30-minute minimum cache life. The model was previewed on June 26, 2026 to a limited group of trusted partners via the OpenAI API and Codex, with general availability rolling out on July 9, 2026 across ChatGPT, Codex, and the API.

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs GPT-5.6 Luna Comparison Table

PropertyGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteGPT-5.6 Luna
OrganizationGoogleOpenAI
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateMar 2026Jul 2026
Context Window1.0M1.5M
Parameters
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.250$1.00
Output $/1M$1.50$6.00
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
ClassificationDemoDemo
Document Question Answering
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Image Tagging
Multi-Label Classification
Model Features
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
68.66%
70.15%
Avg Response Time1.86s4.79s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens1.1K1.3K
Median output tokens680
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0003$0.0017
Defect Detection
73.3%(11/15)
80%(12/15)
Document Understanding
77.8%(7/9)
66.7%(6/9)
Object Counting
30%(3/10)
20%(2/10)
Object Understanding
64.3%(9/14)
92.9%(13/14)
Spatial Understanding
84.2%(16/19)
73.7%(14/19)
OCR
Overall Score
89.96%
73.36%
Avg Response Time1.32s2.21s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens1.1K105
Median output tokens1073
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0003$0.0005
Focused Scene OCR
91.9%(91/99)
66.7%(66/99)
Handwritten Math
80%(8/10)
20%(2/10)
License Plate Recognition
100%(30/30)
83.3%(25/30)
Text Recognition
90%(27/30)
86.7%(26/30)
VQA & Extraction
83.3%(50/60)
81.7%(49/60)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology