Roboflow

GPT-5.4 vs Grok 4

Compare GPT-5.4 and Grok 4 side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in OCR, Image Captioning, and Open Prompt.

Compare GPT-5.4 vs Grok 4 live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
OpenAIGPT-5.4
Run to compare this model.
GrokGrok 4
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

OpenAI
Grok

GPT-5.4 vs Grok 4: Overview

GPT-5.4

GPT-5.4 is a proprietary multimodal large language model developed by OpenAI and released on March 5, 2026. It is designed for professional workloads such as advanced software development, research, and agentic automation. The model combines the general reasoning capabilities of the GPT-5 series with software engineering improvements derived from GPT-5.3-Codex. In the API and Codex environments it supports context windows of up to 1 million tokens, enabling long-context reasoning and large-scale code or document workflows.

Compared with GPT-5.2, GPT-5.4 reduces false individual claims by 33% and lowers overall response errors by 18%, improving factual reliability across complex tasks. It is also the first general-purpose OpenAI release with native computer-use capabilities, allowing agents to interact with desktops, browsers, and external applications to complete multi-step workflows. The model family includes three variants: GPT-5.4 (standard), GPT-5.4 Pro for higher-performance workloads, and GPT-5.4 Thinking, a reasoning-oriented version in ChatGPT that presents an upfront plan before generating its response. The API also introduces a Tool Search system that allows models to retrieve tool definitions dynamically, reducing token usage in tool-heavy integrations.

Grok 4

Grok 4, released by xAI on July 9, 2025, is the fourth-generation model in the Grok family and the most advanced to date. It is multimodal, supporting text, vision, tool use, and real-time web search, with a reported 256,000-token context window for long-form reasoning and document analysis. Its training data extends through November 2024, making it the most up-to-date Grok model at launch.

The lineup includes Grok 4 Generalist for broad tasks, Grok 4 Heavy for higher-capacity reasoning, and Grok 4 Code optimized for programming and debugging. A notable feature is its always-on “Think” mode, designed for deeper multi-step reasoning. While xAI has not disclosed parameter counts, Grok 4 is positioned to compete with frontier models like GPT-5 and Claude 4, balancing real-time knowledge via web integration with structured tool use. It is best suited for coding, complex reasoning, and multimodal AI assistants.

GPT-5.4 vs Grok 4 Comparison Table

PropertyGPT-5.4Grok 4
OrganizationOpenAIxAI
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateMar 2026Jul 2025
Context Window1.1M256K
Parameters
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$2.50
Output $/1M$15.00
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
ClassificationDemo
Object DetectionDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Model Features
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
77.61%
52.24%
Avg Response Time7.16s85.24s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens1.4K
Median output tokens108
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0052
Defect Detection
86.7%(13/15)
80%(12/15)
Document Understanding
88.9%(8/9)
44.4%(4/9)
Object Counting
40%(4/10)
10%(1/10)
Object Understanding
85.7%(12/14)
57.1%(8/14)
Spatial Understanding
78.9%(15/19)
52.6%(10/19)
OCR
Overall Score
79.48%
Avg Response Time3.98s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens105
Median output tokens95
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0017
Focused Scene OCR
75.8%(75/99)
Handwritten Math
60%(6/10)
License Plate Recognition
90%(27/30)
Text Recognition
83.3%(25/30)
VQA & Extraction
81.7%(49/60)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology