Roboflow

Qwen3.7 Flash vs Qwen3.8 27B

Compare Qwen3.7 Flash and Qwen3.8 27B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, Open Prompt, Classification, Object Detection, and OCR.

Compare Qwen3.7 Flash vs Qwen3.8 27B live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
QwenQwen3.7 Flash
Run to compare this model.
QwenQwen3.8 27B
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Qwen3.7 Flash vs Qwen3.8 27B on Vision Evals

Qwen3.8 27B scores higher on all 4 Vision Evals tasks.

The widest gap is Reasoning, where Qwen3.8 27B leads 62.0% to 34.4%.

Overall, Qwen3.7 Flash averages 52.4% (#51 of 61) against 69.5% (#21 of 61) for Qwen3.8 27B.

Qwen3.7 Flash is both cheaper ($0.0001 vs $0.0009 per sample) and faster (5.8s vs 18.0s per sample).

Qwen3.7 FlashQwen3.8 27B

Qwen3.7 Flash vs Qwen3.8 27B Comparison Table

Evals updated October 8, 2026Pricing updated October 10, 2026

PropertyQwen3.7 FlashQwen3.8 27B
OrganizationQwenQwen
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateJul 2026Aug 2026
Context Window1.0M262K
ParametersUnknown27.78B
LicenseProprietaryApache 2.0
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.030$0.425
Output $/1M$0.130$2.55
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Chart Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
ClassificationDemoDemo
Document Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
Image TaggingSupportedSupported
Multi-Label ClassificationSupportedSupported
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision LanguageSupportedSupported
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Model Features
Foundation VisionSupportedSupported
LLMs with Vision CapabilitiesSupportedSupported
Multimodal VisionSupportedSupported
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
52.4%
69.5%
4/5 tasks
Quantizationsself-hosted
BF1669.5%FP868.7%AWQ-INT469.5%hardware →
Avg cost / sample$0.0001$0.0009
Avg speed / sample5.77s17.99s
By task
Object Detection (low)
42.8%
$0.0001
65.7%
±1.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 64.6 to 66.5
$0
Object Detection (high)–
66.1%
±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 64.9 to 67.8
$0
Counting (low)
46.0%
<$0.0001
64.9%
±4.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 60.8 to 68.9
$0
Counting (high)–
68.0%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 66.2 to 70.3
$0
Identification (low)
84.4%
<$0.0001
85.4%
±4.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.3 to 90.6
$0
Identification (high)–
87.5%
±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 84.4 to 90.6
$0
OCR (low)
54.3%
$0.0001
–
by category
Single value
52.2%
Transcription
84.4%
Structured JSON
67.3%
Text localization
9.9%
OCR (high)
62.3%
$0.0004
–
by category
Single value
56.1%
Transcription
83.8%
Structured JSON
75.7%
Text localization
31.7%
Reasoning (low)
34.4%
<$0.0001
62.0%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 60.3 to 64.2
$0
Reasoning (high)
61.6%
$0.0005
66.0%
±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 65.6 to 66.9
$0

Qwen3.7 Flash vs Qwen3.8 27B: Overview

Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is the low-latency, cost-oriented tier of Alibaba's Qwen3.7 series, a vision-language reasoning model that accepts interleaved text and image input and returns text. It is built as a hybrid thinking model: like the rest of the Qwen3.7, Qwen3.6, and Qwen3.5 families served through Alibaba Cloud Model Studio, it can either emit an explicit reasoning trace before answering or respond directly, with thinking behavior controlled by an enable_thinking switch that defaults to on for the Qwen3.7 generation. The model exposes a context window of roughly one million tokens and a maximum generation length of 65,536 tokens, which allows long multi-image sequences, long documents, and extended agent trajectories to be held in a single request.

Functionally, Qwen3.7 Flash targets multimodal agent workloads rather than pure chat. Reported strengths include object recognition, spatial understanding, and perception of real-world scenes, alongside visual coding, search, and computer-use style interaction where the model reads screen content and reasons over interface state. Weights are not published; the model is a proprietary endpoint positioned below Qwen3.7 Plus and Qwen3.7 Max in the same series, and it supports function calling and tool use for agentic pipelines.

Qwen3.8 27B

Qwen3.8-27B is a dense vision-language model of roughly 27.78 billion parameters from Alibaba's Qwen team, built on the architectural foundation established by the Qwen3.5 generation. It takes interleaved text, image, and video input through an integrated vision encoder and produces text, covering document and chart understanding, visual question answering, front-end code generation from visual references, and agentic computer-use workflows. The decoder is a hybrid stack of 64 layers that repeats a pattern of three Gated DeltaNet linear-attention blocks, each followed by a feed-forward block, then one grouped-query full-attention block, so only a quarter of the layers maintain a conventional key-value cache. Native context length is 262,144 tokens.

Post-training targets long-horizon agentic work, and the model exposes per-request thinking control that lets callers switch reasoning traces on or off and choose a reasoning effort level. Multi-token prediction weights are trained alongside the main network for speculative decoding. Qwen reports improvements over Qwen3.6-27B on agentic and multimodal evaluations including Terminal-Bench 2.1, OSWorld-Verified, and SWE-bench Multimodal, with additional results on MathVision, CharXiv, and an internal Vision2Web suite.