Roboflow

GLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Luna

Compare GLM 5.3 Flash and GPT-5.6 Luna side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, OCR, Classification, Object Detection, and Open Prompt.

Compare GLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Luna live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
Z.aiGLM 5.3 Flash
Run to compare this model.
OpenAIGPT-5.6 Luna
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

GLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Luna on Vision Evals

GLM 5.3 Flash scores higher on 3 of the six Vision Evals tasks.

The widest gap is Object Detection, where GPT-5.6 Luna leads 59.9% to 33.1%.

Overall, GLM 5.3 Flash averages 66.3% (#22 of 33) against 71.5% (#14 of 33) for GPT-5.6 Luna.

GLM 5.3 Flash is cheaper ($0.0002 vs $0.0010 per sample), while GPT-5.6 Luna is faster (6.5s vs 6.8s per sample).

GLM 5.3 FlashGPT-5.6 Luna

GLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Luna Comparison Table

Evals updated August 26, 2026Pricing updated August 26, 2026

PropertyGLM 5.3 FlashGPT-5.6 Luna
OrganizationZ.aiOpenAI
Categoryopenclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateAug 2026Jul 2026
Context Window1.0M1.5M
Parameters320B total, 18B active
LicenseMITProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.200
Output $/1M$1.20
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Chart Question Answering
ClassificationDemoDemo
Document Question Answering
Image Tagging
Multi-Label Classification
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Model Features
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
66.3%
71.5%
Avg cost / sample$0.0002$0.0010
Avg speed / sample6.78s6.55s
By task
Object Detection
33.1%
$0.0004
59.9%
$0.0015
Counting
55.4%
$0.0001
66.2%
$0.0007
Identification
84.4%
$0.0001
78.1%
$0.0004
OCR
90.6%
$0.0002
88.4%
$0.0012
Data Extraction
83.5%
$0.0001
81.4%
$0.0004
Reasoning (low)
51.0%
$0.0001
55.0%
$0.0006
Reasoning (high)
59.6%
$0.0001
60.9%
$0.0015

GLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Luna: Overview

GLM 5.3 Flash

GLM-5.3-Flash is the first natively multimodal model in Z.ai's GLM-5 series, a mixture-of-experts transformer with roughly 320 billion total parameters and 18 billion activated per token. It routes each token through 8 of 288 experts across 45 language layers that interleave KDA linear attention with sparse multi-head latent attention, and pairs them with a 24-layer vision encoder that handles image and video input. The checkpoint declares a maximum context length of 1,048,576 tokens, ships in native FP8, and includes a multi-token prediction draft layer for speculative decoding. Z.ai reports that the hybrid attention design reduces attention computation by 3.01x and KV cache size by 4.44x relative to GLM-5.3.

The model starts from a newly trained base built on a 30 trillion token multimodal pre-training corpus and adopts Manifold-Constrained Hyper-Connections to improve scaling efficiency. Vision is integrated into the coding and agent loop, so the model can inspect interfaces, rendered output, and images while operating across code, browsers, and graphical user interfaces. Z.ai reports scores of 84.3 on Terminal-Bench 2.1, 63.4 on DeepSWE 1.1, 55.3 on Humanity's Last Exam with tools, and 48.8 on AutomationBench, and the model exposes low, high, and max thinking modes.

GPT-5.6 Luna

GPT-5.6 Luna is the fastest and most cost-efficient model in OpenAI's GPT-5.6 family, which also includes Sol (the flagship tier) and Terra (the balanced mid-tier). Introduced under a new naming convention where the generation number (5.6) and a durable capability tier name (Luna, Terra, Sol) together define each model, Luna occupies the lightweight end of the family and is designed for high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads such as summarization, drafting, autocomplete, classification, and routine automation. The GPT-5.6 family as a whole advances capabilities in software engineering, computer use, professional knowledge work, scientific research, and cybersecurity, with all three tiers rated at the "High" capability level under OpenAI's Preparedness Framework for both cybersecurity and biological/chemical risk domains.

GPT-5.6 Luna supports multimodal input and function calling, and shares the family's 1.5 million token context window. On Terminal-Bench 2.1, Luna scores 82.5%, and on the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index it outperforms comparable models at roughly one-quarter the estimated cost of higher-tier alternatives. Luna is priced at $1 per million input tokens and $6 per million output tokens, with cached input reads at $0.10 per million tokens under the GPT-5.6 prompt caching scheme, which introduces explicit cache breakpoints and a 30-minute minimum cache life. The model was previewed on June 26, 2026 to a limited group of trusted partners via the OpenAI API and Codex, with general availability rolling out on July 9, 2026 across ChatGPT, Codex, and the API.

Frequently Asked Questions

On Roboflow's Vision Evals, GPT-5.6 Luna performed slightly better overall. The two split the six vision tasks 3 to 3, but GPT-5.6 Luna averages 71.5% (#14 of 33) against 66.3% (#22 of 33) for GLM 5.3 Flash. These scores measure vision capabilities only; either model may perform differently on work outside this benchmark's tasks.

No. On the Vision Evals Object Detection benchmark, GPT-5.6 Luna leads with 59.9% against 33.1%. This is the widest gap between the two models across the benchmark's tasks.

GLM 5.3 Flash is cheaper to run. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals task mix it averaged $0.0002 per sample against $0.0010. Actual costs depend on your image sizes, prompts, and output length.

GPT-5.6 Luna is faster. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals it averaged 6.5s per inference against 6.8s. Latency varies with image size, prompt length, and provider load, so treat these as relative rather than guaranteed figures.

Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for image captioning and OCR in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.