GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Compare GLM 5.3 Flash and Qwen3.7 Flash side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, OCR, Classification, Object Detection, and Open Prompt.
Compare GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Flash live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Models in this comparison
GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Flash on Vision Evals
GLM 5.3 Flash scores higher on 3 of the five Vision Evals tasks.
The widest gap is Reasoning, where GLM 5.3 Flash leads 51.0% to 34.4%.
Overall, GLM 5.3 Flash averages 55.8% (#42 of 61) against 52.4% (#51 of 61) for Qwen3.7 Flash.
Qwen3.7 Flash is both cheaper ($0.0001 vs $0.0006 per sample) and faster (5.8s vs 9.3s per sample).
GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Flash Comparison Table
Evals updated October 8, 2026Pricing updated October 10, 2026
| Property | GLM 5.3 Flash | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | Z.ai | Qwen |
| Category | open | closed |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Aug 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Context Window | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| Parameters | 320B total, 18B active | Unknown |
| License | MIT | Proprietary |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $0.150 | $0.030 |
| Output $/1M | $0.500 | $0.130 |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Captioning | Demo | Demo |
| Chart Question Answering | Supported | Supported |
| Classification | Demo | Demo |
| Document Question Answering | Supported | Supported |
| Image Tagging | Supported | Supported |
| Multi-Label Classification | Supported | Supported |
| Object Detection | Demo | Demo |
| OCR | Demo | Demo |
| Vision Language | Supported | Supported |
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | Demo |
| Model Features | ||
| Foundation Vision | Supported | Supported |
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | Supported | Supported |
| Multimodal Vision | Supported | Supported |
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort | ||
| Overall | 55.8% | 52.4% |
| Avg cost / sample | $0.0006 | $0.0001 |
| Avg speed / sample | 9.29s | 5.77s |
| By task | ||
| Object Detection | 33.1% | 42.8% |
| Counting | 55.4% | 46.0% |
| Identification | 84.4% | 84.4% |
| OCR (low) | 55.4% | 54.3% |
| by category |
|
|
| OCR (high) | 55.3% | 62.3% |
| by category |
|
|
| Reasoning (low) | 51.0% | 34.4% |
| Reasoning (high) | 59.6% | 61.6% |
GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Flash: Overview
GLM-5.3-Flash is the first natively multimodal model in Z.ai's GLM-5 series, a mixture-of-experts transformer with roughly 320 billion total parameters and 18 billion activated per token. It routes each token through 8 of 288 experts across 45 language layers that interleave KDA linear attention with sparse multi-head latent attention, and pairs them with a 24-layer vision encoder that handles image and video input. The checkpoint declares a maximum context length of 1,048,576 tokens, ships in native FP8, and includes a multi-token prediction draft layer for speculative decoding. Z.ai reports that the hybrid attention design reduces attention computation by 3.01x and KV cache size by 4.44x relative to GLM-5.3.
The model starts from a newly trained base built on a 30 trillion token multimodal pre-training corpus and adopts Manifold-Constrained Hyper-Connections to improve scaling efficiency. Vision is integrated into the coding and agent loop, so the model can inspect interfaces, rendered output, and images while operating across code, browsers, and graphical user interfaces. Z.ai reports scores of 84.3 on Terminal-Bench 2.1, 63.4 on DeepSWE 1.1, 55.3 on Humanity's Last Exam with tools, and 48.8 on AutomationBench, and the model exposes low, high, and max thinking modes.
Qwen3.7 Flash is the low-latency, cost-oriented tier of Alibaba's Qwen3.7 series, a vision-language reasoning model that accepts interleaved text and image input and returns text. It is built as a hybrid thinking model: like the rest of the Qwen3.7, Qwen3.6, and Qwen3.5 families served through Alibaba Cloud Model Studio, it can either emit an explicit reasoning trace before answering or respond directly, with thinking behavior controlled by an enable_thinking switch that defaults to on for the Qwen3.7 generation. The model exposes a context window of roughly one million tokens and a maximum generation length of 65,536 tokens, which allows long multi-image sequences, long documents, and extended agent trajectories to be held in a single request.
Functionally, Qwen3.7 Flash targets multimodal agent workloads rather than pure chat. Reported strengths include object recognition, spatial understanding, and perception of real-world scenes, alongside visual coding, search, and computer-use style interaction where the model reads screen content and reasons over interface state. Weights are not published; the model is a proprietary endpoint positioned below Qwen3.7 Plus and Qwen3.7 Max in the same series, and it supports function calling and tool use for agentic pipelines.