Roboflow

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Qwen3.5 9b

Compare Gemma 4 26B A4B and Qwen3.5 9b side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, OCR, and Open Prompt.

Compare Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Qwen3.5 9b live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
GoogleGemma 4 26B A4B
Run to compare this model.
QwenQwen3.5 9b
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Qwen3.5 9b: Overview

Gemma 4 26B A4B

Gemma 4 26B A4B is the Mixture-of-Experts variant in Google's Gemma 4 family, with 25.2B total parameters but only 3.8B active per token. Built from the same Gemini 3 research as the 31B dense sibling and released as open weights under the Apache 2.0 license, it supports a 256K token context window with text and image input and configurable thinking mode. The "A4B" in the name refers to its approximately 4B active parameters. The MoE design makes it significantly faster at inference than the dense 31B, running nearly as fast as a 4B-parameter model while delivering roughly 97% of the dense model's quality.

For vision tasks, the 26B A4B shares the same multimodal capabilities as the 31B image understanding with variable aspect ratios and resolutions, and structured bounding box output for UI element detection. The tradeoff versus the 31B dense model is a small quality reduction in exchange for much faster inference and lower hardware requirements, fitting in 18GB of VRAM at 4-bit quantization. It ranked #6 among open models on the Arena AI text leaderboard at launch.

Qwen3.5 9b

Qwen3.5-9B is a 9-billion-parameter multimodal foundation model developed by Alibaba Cloud's Qwen team, released on March 2, 2026 as part of the Qwen3.5 model family. Designed for efficient multimodal reasoning and long-context language tasks, it notably outperforms the older Qwen3-30B, a model more than three times its size, on key benchmarks including GPQA Diamond, IFEval, and LongBench.

The model supports vision-language inputs through an early-fusion multimodal architecture built on a dense hybrid foundation of Gated Delta Networks and Gated Attention. It can also operate in a text-only mode by skipping the vision encoder during inference. It provides a 262,144-token context window (extensible to ~1M tokens via YaRN) and is released under the Apache License 2.0. Within the current AI landscape, Qwen3.5-9B offers a strong balance of capability and efficiency, making it well-suited for multimodal assistants, document analysis, long-context reasoning, and developer-deployed agentic systems.

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Qwen3.5 9b Comparison Table

PropertyGemma 4 26B A4BQwen3.5 9b
OrganizationGoogleQwen
Categoryopenopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateApr 2026Mar 2026
Context Window256K262K
Parameters25.2B9B
LicenseApache 2.0Apache 2.0
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.060$0.100
Output $/1M$0.330$0.150
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Object DetectionDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
classificationDemo
Model Features
Multimodal Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
68.66%
71.64%
Avg Response Time30.23s8.99s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens294
Median output tokens214
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0001
Defect Detection
80%(12/15)
86.7%(13/15)
Document Understanding
88.9%(8/9)
66.7%(6/9)
Object Counting
10%(1/10)
30%(3/10)
Object Understanding
85.7%(12/14)
71.4%(10/14)
Spatial Understanding
68.4%(13/19)
84.2%(16/19)
OCR
Overall Score
83.84%
Avg Response Time12.05s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens290
Median output tokens42
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark<$0.0001
Focused Scene OCR
85.9%(85/99)
Handwritten Math
50%(5/10)
License Plate Recognition
93.3%(28/30)
Text Recognition
80%(24/30)
VQA & Extraction
83.3%(50/60)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology