Roboflow

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Qwen3.5 9b

Compare Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite and Qwen3.5 9b side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, Open Prompt, and OCR.

Compare Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Qwen3.5 9b live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
GoogleGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Run to compare this model.
QwenQwen3.5 9b
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Qwen3.5 9b: Overview

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is a natively multimodal reasoning model from Google DeepMind in the Gemini 3 series, based on the Gemini 3 Pro architecture. It processes text, image, video, audio, and PDF inputs within a 1 million token context window and produces text output up to 64K tokens. The model targets high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads and supports visual question answering, image and document data extraction, content moderation, classification, translation, automated speech recognition, and agentic data pipelines. It exposes configurable thinking levels of minimal, low, medium, and high, which set the depth of internal reasoning applied per request and let developers balance response quality against cost and latency.

On benchmarks reported at launch, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite scores 86.9% on GPQA Diamond and 76.8% on the MMMU Pro multimodal benchmark, and reaches an Elo score of 1432 on the Arena.ai leaderboard. According to Artificial Analysis benchmarks, it produces a 2.5 times faster time to first answer token and a 45% increase in output speed relative to Gemini 2.5 Flash. It also shows improved instruction following, higher audio input quality for automated speech recognition tasks, and support for structured JSON output used in data extraction pipelines.

Qwen3.5 9b

Qwen3.5-9B is a 9-billion-parameter multimodal foundation model developed by Alibaba Cloud's Qwen team, released on March 2, 2026 as part of the Qwen3.5 model family. Designed for efficient multimodal reasoning and long-context language tasks, it notably outperforms the older Qwen3-30B, a model more than three times its size, on key benchmarks including GPQA Diamond, IFEval, and LongBench.

The model supports vision-language inputs through an early-fusion multimodal architecture built on a dense hybrid foundation of Gated Delta Networks and Gated Attention. It can also operate in a text-only mode by skipping the vision encoder during inference. It provides a 262,144-token context window (extensible to ~1M tokens via YaRN) and is released under the Apache License 2.0. Within the current AI landscape, Qwen3.5-9B offers a strong balance of capability and efficiency, making it well-suited for multimodal assistants, document analysis, long-context reasoning, and developer-deployed agentic systems.

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Qwen3.5 9b Comparison Table

PropertyGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteQwen3.5 9b
OrganizationGoogleQwen
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateMar 2026Mar 2026
Context Window1.0M262K
Parameters9B
LicenseProprietaryApache 2.0
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.250$0.100
Output $/1M$1.50$0.150
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Object DetectionDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
ClassificationDemo
Document Question Answering
Image Tagging
Multi-Label Classification
Model Features
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
68.66%
71.64%
Avg Response Time1.86s8.99s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens1.1K
Median output tokens6
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0003
Defect Detection
73.3%(11/15)
86.7%(13/15)
Document Understanding
77.8%(7/9)
66.7%(6/9)
Object Counting
30%(3/10)
30%(3/10)
Object Understanding
64.3%(9/14)
71.4%(10/14)
Spatial Understanding
84.2%(16/19)
84.2%(16/19)
OCR
Overall Score
89.96%
Avg Response Time1.32s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens1.1K
Median output tokens10
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0003
Focused Scene OCR
91.9%(91/99)
Handwritten Math
80%(8/10)
License Plate Recognition
100%(30/30)
Text Recognition
90%(27/30)
VQA & Extraction
83.3%(50/60)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology