Roboflow

Gemma 3 27B vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Compare Gemma 3 27B and Qwen3.7 Plus side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, OCR, and Open Prompt.

Compare Gemma 3 27B vs Qwen3.7 Plus live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
GoogleGemma 3 27B
Run to compare this model.
QwenQwen3.7 Plus
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Gemma 3 27B vs Qwen3.7 Plus Comparison Table

Evals updated October 8, 2026Pricing updated October 8, 2026

PropertyGemma 3 27BQwen3.7 Plus
OrganizationGoogleQwen
Categoryopenclosed
Modalitymultimodal—
Release DateMar 2025Jun 2026
Context Window128K—
ParametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseCustomUnknown
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.080$0.320
Output $/1M$0.450$1.28
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
ClassificationSupportedDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Chart Question AnsweringSupportedNot listed
Document Question AnsweringSupportedNot listed
Image TaggingSupportedNot listed
Multi-Label ClassificationSupportedNot listed
object-detectionNot listedDemo
Vision LanguageSupportedNot listed
Model Features
Foundation VisionSupportedNot listed
LLMs with Vision CapabilitiesSupportedNot listed
Multimodal VisionSupportedNot listed
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
OverallNot evaluated
58.9%
Avg cost / sample–$0.0008
Avg speed / sample–7.77s
By task
Object Detection–
60.1%
$0.0013
Counting–
50.0%
$0.0004
Identification–
84.4%
$0.0003
OCR (low)–
60.3%
$0.0009
by category
Single value
53.5%
Transcription
86.7%
Structured JSON
75.8%
Text localization
23.1%
OCR (high)–
65.5%
$0.0042
by category
Single value
58.3%
Transcription
89.7%
Structured JSON
81.3%
Text localization
30.4%
Reasoning (low)–
39.7%
$0.0003
Reasoning (high)–
68.2%
$0.0043

Gemma 3 27B vs Qwen3.7 Plus: Overview

Gemma 3 27B

Gemma 3 27B, announced on March 12, 2025, is the largest open-weight model in Google DeepMind’s Gemma 3 family. With around 27 billion parameters, it is multimodal—accepting both text and images as input and producing text outputs. It supports a 128,000-token context window and typically generates up to ~8,192 tokens, enabling it to process multi-page documents, extended conversations, or large batches of images in a single prompt.

The model is instruction-tuned in its “-it” variants for chat, reasoning, and summarization use cases, and it supports structured outputs and function calling. It is multilingual, covering over 140 languages. Deployment is flexible: the full BF16 model requires ~46 GB of VRAM, but quantization-aware training (QAT) versions in 8-bit or 4-bit reduce the footprint significantly, allowing more accessible use outside large-scale clusters. While it delivers stronger reasoning and multimodal performance than smaller Gemma models, it remains lighter and more open than proprietary systems, making it well-suited for research, development, and fine-tuned applications.

Qwen3.7 Plus
No description available

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemma 3 27B has not yet been evaluated on Roboflow's current Vision Evals, so this comparison shows specs, licensing, and pricing rather than benchmark scores.

Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for image captioning and OCR in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.