Roboflow

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen3.5 27B

Compare Gemini 3.7 Flash and Qwen3.5 27B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, Open Prompt, Classification, and OCR.

Compare Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen3.5 27B live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Compare image classification labels and confidence scores side-by-side.

Open Classification in the full playground
GoogleGemini 3.7 Flash
Run to compare this model.
QwenQwen3.5 27B
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen3.5 27B on Vision Evals

Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher on all six Vision Evals tasks.

The widest gap is Reasoning, where Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 82.8% to 31.8%.

Overall, Gemini 3.7 Flash averages 84.6% (#2 of 30) against 64.3% (#26 of 30) for Qwen3.5 27B.

Qwen3.5 27B is both cheaper ($0.0007 vs $0.0016 per sample) and faster (7.4s vs 10.0s per sample).

Gemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.5 27B

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen3.5 27B Comparison Table

Evals updated August 14, 2026Pricing updated August 15, 2026

PropertyGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.5 27B
OrganizationGoogleQwen
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateAug 2026Feb 2026
Context Window1.0M262K
ParametersUndisclosed27B
LicenseProprietaryApache 2.0
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.375$0.195
Output $/1M$1.88$1.56
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Chart Question Answering
ClassificationDemoDemo
Document Question Answering
Image Tagging
Multi-Label Classification
Object DetectionDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Model Features
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
84.6%
64.3%
Avg cost / sample$0.0016$0.0007
Avg speed / sample9.97s7.38s
By task
Object Detection
69.4%
$0.0024
58.8%
$0.0013
Counting
77.0%
$0.0013
54.0%
$0.0002
Identification
96.9%
$0.0007
78.1%
$0.0002
OCR
86.9%
$0.0014
84.5%
$0.0009
Data Extraction
94.8%
$0.0007
78.3%
$0.0002
Reasoning (low)
82.8%
$0.0011
31.8%
$0.0002
Reasoning (high)
82.1%
$0.0026
61.6%
$0.0065

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen3.5 27B: Overview

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Gemini 3.7 Flash is a proprietary multimodal model from Google, positioned in the Flash branch of the Gemini 3 series that trades some of the capacity of the larger Pro models for lower latency and lower cost per token. It accepts interleaved text and image input alongside other modalities handled by the Gemini family and returns text, and it continues the series pattern of exposing a configurable thinking budget so that reasoning effort can be scaled up for harder problems or reduced for high throughput extraction, routing and classification work. The model is announced roughly three weeks after Gemini 3.6 Flash, part of an unusually fast iteration cadence within the Flash line.

Google reports gains concentrated in agentic coding and front end generation, citing a WebDev Arena Elo of 1588 for this release compared with 1538 for the preceding Flash model, and describes it as producing more functional layouts and more feature complete applications in fewer prompts. Weights are not published and the architecture, parameter count and training corpus are undisclosed, consistent with prior Gemini releases. Visual capability follows the Flash lineage, covering image and document understanding, chart and diagram interpretation, text recognition in images, and general visual question answering.

Qwen3.5 27B

Qwen3.5-27B is a multimodal dense hybrid model developed by Alibaba Cloud’s Qwen team and released in February 2026 as a high-precision entry in the Qwen3.5 "Medium" series. Unlike its Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) siblings, the 27B model utilizes a dense architecture combining Gated Delta Networks with a feed-forward structure, activating its full parameter suite for every inference to maximize reliability. This design provides the highest instruction-following and coding accuracy in its class, with a notable IFEval score of 95.0. The model features a native 262K-token context window, extensible to 1M tokens via YaRN (RoPE scaling), and is released under the Apache-2.0 license.

Optimized for agentic workflows, Qwen3.5-27B employs an early-fusion architecture that treats visual and textual data as a unified stream for deep cross-modal reasoning. This unified approach allows the model to excel in technical analysis and software engineering, matching GPT-5-mini with a 72.4% score on SWE-bench Verified. While the larger MoE variants in the family lead in raw knowledge benchmarks, the 27B model offers a stable and high-density alternative for structured data extraction and spatial perception, contributing to the Qwen3.5 family’s generational leap in OCR accuracy over the previous Qwen3-VL series.

Frequently Asked Questions

On Roboflow's Vision Evals, Gemini 3.7 Flash performed better. It scores higher on all six vision tasks and averages 84.6% (#2 of 30) against 64.3% (#26 of 30) for Qwen3.5 27B. These scores measure vision capabilities only; either model may perform differently on work outside this benchmark's tasks.

Yes. On the Vision Evals Reasoning benchmark at low effort, Gemini 3.7 Flash leads with 82.8% against 31.8%. This is the widest gap between the two models across the benchmark's tasks.

Qwen3.5 27B is cheaper to run. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals task mix it averaged $0.0007 per sample against $0.0016. Gemini 3.7 Flash is priced at $0.38 per 1M input tokens and $1.88 per 1M output; Qwen3.5 27B is priced at $0.20 per 1M input tokens and $1.56 per 1M output. Actual costs depend on your image sizes, prompts, and output length.

Qwen3.5 27B is faster. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals it averaged 7.4s per inference against 10.0s. Latency varies with image size, prompt length, and provider load, so treat these as relative rather than guaranteed figures.

Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for image captioning and open prompts in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.