Roboflow

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen3.6 27B

Compare Gemini 3.5 Flash and Qwen3.6 27B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Open Prompt, Image Captioning, and OCR.

Compare Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen3.6 27B live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
GoogleGemini 3.5 Flash
Run to compare this model.
QwenQwen3.6 27B
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen3.6 27B on Vision Evals

Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher on all six Vision Evals tasks.

The widest gap is Reasoning, where Gemini 3.5 Flash leads 82.1% to 59.2%.

Overall, Gemini 3.5 Flash averages 86.0% (#2 of 60) against 73.6% (#25 of 60) for Qwen3.6 27B.

Qwen3.6 27B is cheaper ($0.0021 vs $0.011 per sample), while Gemini 3.5 Flash is faster (14.8s vs 42.1s per sample).

Gemini 3.5 FlashQwen3.6 27B

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen3.6 27B Comparison Table

Evals updated October 7, 2026Pricing updated October 7, 2026

PropertyGemini 3.5 FlashQwen3.6 27B
OrganizationGoogleQwen
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateMay 2026Apr 2026
Context Window1.0M262K
ParametersUnknown27B
LicenseProprietaryApache 2.0
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$1.50$0.300
Output $/1M$9.00$2.00
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Chart Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
ClassificationDemoSupported
Document Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
Image TaggingSupportedSupported
Multi-Label ClassificationSupportedSupported
OCRDemoDemo
Vision LanguageSupportedSupported
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Object DetectionDemoNot listed
Video ClassificationNot listedSupported
Model Features
Foundation VisionSupportedSupported
LLMs with Vision CapabilitiesSupportedSupported
Multimodal VisionSupportedSupported
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
86.0%
73.6%
Quantizationsself-hosted
BF1669.4%FP873.6%AWQ-INT469.8%hardware →
Avg cost / sample$0.011$0.0021
Avg speed / sample14.77s42.09s
By task
Object Detection (low)
70.6%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 68.7 to 72.6
$0.016
59.7%
±0.9, Mean of 3 runs, range 59.0 to 60.8
$0
Object Detection (high)
69.8%
±1.8, Mean of 3 runs, range 67.5 to 71.1
$0.021
–
Counting (low)
80.6%
±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 79.7 to 81.1
$0.0075
67.1%
±4.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 62.2 to 71.6
$0
Counting (high)
82.4%
±0.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 82.4 to 82.4
$0.017
–
Identification (low)
99.0%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 96.9 to 100.0
$0.0040
82.3%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.3 to 84.4
$0
Identification (high)
97.9%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 96.9 to 100.0
$0.0068
–
OCR (low)
89.3%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 88.0 to 91.1
$0.016
88.5%
±1.9, Mean of 3 runs, range 86.7 to 90.6
$0
OCR (high)
88.9%
±0.2, Mean of 3 runs, range 88.7 to 89.1
$0.035
–
Data Extraction (low)
94.5%
±0.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 93.8 to 94.8
$0.0037
84.5%
±1.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 83.5 to 85.6
$0
Data Extraction (high)
95.5%
±1.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 93.8 to 96.9
$0.0066
–
Reasoning (low)
82.1%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 80.1 to 84.1
$0.0082
59.2%
±1.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 57.6 to 60.9
$0
Reasoning (high)
81.0%
±1.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 79.5 to 82.8
$0.018
–

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen3.6 27B: Overview

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Gemini 3.5 Flash is a multimodal language model developed by Google DeepMind and released at Google I/O 2026. It is built on the Gemini 3 Flash reasoning foundation and introduces configurable thinking levels (minimal, low, medium, and high) that allow developers to tune the depth of internal reasoning before a response is generated. The model accepts text, image, video, audio, and PDF inputs and produces text output, with a 1 million token context window and up to 65,000 output tokens per request. It is natively multimodal, processing visual inputs alongside text to support tasks such as image captioning, classification, optical character recognition, object detection, and visual grounding, where the model references specific regions within an image or video frame.

Its vision capabilities extend to interpreting UI screenshots, diagrams, charts, and real-world scenes, as well as understanding video and live frame sequences for activity and scene recognition. The model supports combined tool use, including Google Search, URL context, code execution, and custom functions, within a single request, and it uses reasoning context from previous turns when thought signatures are present in the conversation history, enabling persistent multi-turn reasoning chains. Gemini 3.5 Flash carries a knowledge cutoff of January 2026 and is available via the Gemini API, Google AI Studio, Google Antigravity, and the Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform.

Qwen3.6 27B

Qwen3.6-27B is a dense 27-billion-parameter multimodal language model developed by Alibaba's Qwen team and released on April 22, 2026. It combines a causal language model with an integrated vision encoder, supporting text, image, and video inputs natively. The architecture employs a hybrid attention design that interleaves Gated DeltaNet linear attention blocks with standard Gated Attention layers across 64 transformer layers with a hidden dimension of 5,120. Unlike Mixture-of-Experts variants in the Qwen3.6 family, all 27 billion parameters are active on every inference pass, simplifying deployment and quantization. The model supports a native context window of 262,144 tokens, extensible to approximately 1,010,000 tokens via YaRN scaling. It is released under the Apache 2.0 license with open weights available on Hugging Face and ModelScope.

The model introduces two notable capabilities relative to prior Qwen releases: enhanced agentic coding support covering frontend workflows and repository-level reasoning, and a Thinking Preservation mechanism that retains chain-of-thought reasoning context across multi-turn conversation history to reduce redundant token generation in iterative agent sessions. It supports both a thinking mode for multi-step reasoning and a non-thinking mode for faster responses within a single model. On coding benchmarks, Qwen reports scores of 77.2 on SWE-bench Verified, 59.3 on Terminal-Bench 2.0, and 48.2 on SkillsBench. Vision capabilities include chart understanding (CharXiv RQ: 78.4), OCR (CC-OCR: 81.2), and video understanding (VideoMME with subtitles: 87.7).