Roboflow

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen3.5 27B

Compare Gemini 3.5 Flash and Qwen3.5 27B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Open Prompt, Image Captioning, OCR, Classification, and Object Detection.

Compare Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen3.5 27B live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
GoogleGemini 3.5 Flash
Run to compare this model.
QwenQwen3.5 27B
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen3.5 27B on Vision Evals

Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher on all six Vision Evals tasks.

The widest gap is Reasoning, where Gemini 3.5 Flash leads 84.1% to 31.8%.

Overall, Gemini 3.5 Flash averages 86.6% (#1 of 25) against 64.3% (#22 of 25) for Qwen3.5 27B.

Qwen3.5 27B is cheaper ($0.0007 vs $0.011 per sample), while Gemini 3.5 Flash is faster (5.8s vs 7.4s per sample).

Gemini 3.5 FlashQwen3.5 27B

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen3.5 27B Comparison Table

Evals updated August 6, 2026Pricing updated August 12, 2026

PropertyGemini 3.5 FlashQwen3.5 27B
OrganizationGoogleQwen
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateMay 2026Feb 2026
Context Window1.0M262K
Parameters27B
LicenseProprietaryApache 2.0
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$1.50$0.195
Output $/1M$9.00$1.56
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Chart Question Answering
ClassificationDemoDemo
Document Question Answering
Image Tagging
Multi-Label Classification
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Model Features
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
86.6%
64.3%
Avg cost / sample$0.011$0.0007
Avg speed / sample5.82s7.38s
By task
Object Detection
68.7%
$0.016
58.8%
$0.0013
Counting
81.1%
$0.0075
54.0%
$0.0002
Identification
100.0%
$0.0042
78.1%
$0.0002
OCR
91.1%
$0.016
84.5%
$0.0009
Data Extraction
94.8%
$0.0037
78.3%
$0.0002
Reasoning (low)
84.1%
$0.0080
31.8%
$0.0002
Reasoning (high)
82.8%
$0.017
61.6%
$0.0065

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen3.5 27B: Overview

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Gemini 3.5 Flash is a multimodal language model developed by Google DeepMind and released at Google I/O 2026. It is built on the Gemini 3 Flash reasoning foundation and introduces configurable thinking levels (minimal, low, medium, and high) that allow developers to tune the depth of internal reasoning before a response is generated. The model accepts text, image, video, audio, and PDF inputs and produces text output, with a 1 million token context window and up to 65,000 output tokens per request. It is natively multimodal, processing visual inputs alongside text to support tasks such as image captioning, classification, optical character recognition, object detection, and visual grounding, where the model references specific regions within an image or video frame.

Its vision capabilities extend to interpreting UI screenshots, diagrams, charts, and real-world scenes, as well as understanding video and live frame sequences for activity and scene recognition. The model supports combined tool use, including Google Search, URL context, code execution, and custom functions, within a single request, and it uses reasoning context from previous turns when thought signatures are present in the conversation history, enabling persistent multi-turn reasoning chains. Gemini 3.5 Flash carries a knowledge cutoff of January 2026 and is available via the Gemini API, Google AI Studio, Google Antigravity, and the Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform.

Qwen3.5 27B

Qwen3.5-27B is a multimodal dense hybrid model developed by Alibaba Cloud’s Qwen team and released in February 2026 as a high-precision entry in the Qwen3.5 "Medium" series. Unlike its Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) siblings, the 27B model utilizes a dense architecture combining Gated Delta Networks with a feed-forward structure, activating its full parameter suite for every inference to maximize reliability. This design provides the highest instruction-following and coding accuracy in its class, with a notable IFEval score of 95.0. The model features a native 262K-token context window, extensible to 1M tokens via YaRN (RoPE scaling), and is released under the Apache-2.0 license.

Optimized for agentic workflows, Qwen3.5-27B employs an early-fusion architecture that treats visual and textual data as a unified stream for deep cross-modal reasoning. This unified approach allows the model to excel in technical analysis and software engineering, matching GPT-5-mini with a 72.4% score on SWE-bench Verified. While the larger MoE variants in the family lead in raw knowledge benchmarks, the 27B model offers a stable and high-density alternative for structured data extraction and spatial perception, contributing to the Qwen3.5 family’s generational leap in OCR accuracy over the previous Qwen3-VL series.