Roboflow

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Grok 4

Compare Gemini 3.1 Pro and Grok 4 side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, Open Prompt, and OCR.

Compare Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Grok 4 live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
GoogleGemini 3.1 Pro
Run to compare this model.
GrokGrok 4
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Grok

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Grok 4: Overview

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Gemini 3.1 Pro is a proprietary multimodal model from Google’s Gemini 3 series, released in early 2026 and designed for advanced reasoning across large multimodal datasets. It accepts text, images, audio, video, and documents, supporting up to a 1-million-token input context with up to 64k output tokens. Compared with Gemini 3 Pro, it improves long-context synthesis and multi-step reasoning, enabling more reliable analysis of large documents, datasets, and software codebases.

The model also advances visual understanding and grounding, allowing it to interpret UI screenshots, diagrams, and real-world scenes while referencing specific regions within images or video. These capabilities make Gemini 3.1 Pro well suited for multimodal workflows involving document processing, interface analysis, robotics research, and complex visual reasoning.

Grok 4

Grok 4, released by xAI on July 9, 2025, is the fourth-generation model in the Grok family and the most advanced to date. It is multimodal, supporting text, vision, tool use, and real-time web search, with a reported 256,000-token context window for long-form reasoning and document analysis. Its training data extends through November 2024, making it the most up-to-date Grok model at launch.

The lineup includes Grok 4 Generalist for broad tasks, Grok 4 Heavy for higher-capacity reasoning, and Grok 4 Code optimized for programming and debugging. A notable feature is its always-on “Think” mode, designed for deeper multi-step reasoning. While xAI has not disclosed parameter counts, Grok 4 is positioned to compete with frontier models like GPT-5 and Claude 4, balancing real-time knowledge via web integration with structured tool use. It is best suited for coding, complex reasoning, and multimodal AI assistants.

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Grok 4 Comparison Table

PropertyGemini 3.1 ProGrok 4
OrganizationGooglexAI
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateFeb 2026Jul 2025
Context Window1.0M256K
Parameters
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$2.00
Output $/1M$12.00
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
ClassificationDemo
Object DetectionDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Model Features
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 66 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
75.76%
52.24%
Avg Response Time6.13s85.24s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens1.1K
Median output tokens11
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0024
Defect Detection
73.3%(11/15)
80%(12/15)
Document Understanding
88.9%(8/9)
44.4%(4/9)
Object Counting
44.4%(4/9)
10%(1/10)
Object Understanding
92.9%(13/14)
57.1%(8/14)
Spatial Understanding
73.7%(14/19)
52.6%(10/19)
OCR
Overall Score
89.52%
Avg Response Time3.11s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens1.1K
Median output tokens12
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0024
Focused Scene OCR
94.9%(94/99)
Handwritten Math
90%(9/10)
License Plate Recognition
90%(27/30)
Text Recognition
86.7%(26/30)
VQA & Extraction
81.7%(49/60)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology