Roboflow

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemini 3.8 Flash

Compare Gemini 2.5 Pro and Gemini 3.8 Flash side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Object Detection, Open Prompt, Classification, OCR, and Image Captioning.

Compare Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemini 3.8 Flash live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
GoogleGemini 2.5 Pro
Run to compare this model.
GoogleGemini 3.8 Flash
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemini 3.8 Flash on Vision Evals

Gemini 3.8 Flash scores higher on all five Vision Evals tasks.

The widest gap is Reasoning, where Gemini 3.8 Flash leads 81.2% to 42.4%.

Overall, Gemini 2.5 Pro averages 57.6% (#40 of 63) against 79.8% (#7 of 63) for Gemini 3.8 Flash.

Gemini 3.8 Flash is cheaper ($0.0045 vs $0.0051 per sample), while Gemini 2.5 Pro is faster (6.8s vs 12.8s per sample).

Gemini 2.5 ProGemini 3.8 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemini 3.8 Flash Comparison Table

Evals updated October 13, 2026Pricing updated October 17, 2026

PropertyGemini 2.5 ProGemini 3.8 Flash
OrganizationGoogleGoogle
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateJun 2025Sep 2026
Context Window1.0M1.0M
ParametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Commercial usecommercial use per vendor termscommercial use per vendor terms
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$1.25$0.825
Output $/1M$10.00$4.13
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Chart Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
ClassificationDemoDemo
Document Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
Image TaggingSupportedSupported
Multi-Label ClassificationSupportedSupported
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision LanguageSupportedSupported
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Model Features
Foundation VisionSupportedSupported
LLMs with Vision CapabilitiesSupportedSupported
Multimodal VisionSupportedSupported
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
57.6%
79.8%
Avg cost / sample$0.0051$0.0045
Avg speed / sample6.83s12.76s
By task
Object Detection (low)
33.7%
$0.010
68.1%
±0.8, Mean of 3 runs, range 67.3 to 69.0
$0.0045
Object Detection (high)–
74.8%
±1.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 73.4 to 75.6
$0.023
Counting (low)
52.7%
$0.0012
78.8%
±2.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 75.7 to 81.1
$0.0040
Counting (high)–
79.3%
±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.4 to 81.1
$0.027
Identification (low)
93.8%
$0.0012
97.9%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 96.9 to 100.0
$0.0016
Identification (high)–
96.9%
±0.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 96.9 to 96.9
$0.0037
OCR (low)
65.2%
$0.0046
72.8%
$0.0049
by category
Single value
60.9%
Transcription
86.8%
Structured JSON
76.3%
Text localization
35.9%
Single value
73.5%
Transcription
91.3%
Structured JSON
86.1%
Text localization
26.4%
OCR (high)
64.6%
$0.025
78.7%
$0.039
by category
Single value
63.0%
Transcription
87.3%
Structured JSON
78.3%
Text localization
20.6%
Single value
70.9%
Transcription
94.1%
Structured JSON
90.9%
Text localization
58.6%
Reasoning (low)
42.4%
$0.0013
81.2%
±0.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 80.8 to 81.5
$0.0038
Reasoning (high)
62.3%
$0.011
84.5%
±1.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 83.4 to 85.4
$0.023

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: Overview

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Gemini 2.5 Pro, released on June 17, 2025, is Google DeepMind’s most capable model in the Gemini 2.5 family, optimized for deep reasoning, coding, and complex multimodal tasks. It accepts text, images, audio, video, and PDFs as input and outputs text. The model supports 1 million input tokens with an output capacity of up to 65K tokens, enabling large-scale comprehension of datasets, codebases, and technical documents. Its training knowledge extends to January 2025.

Pro outperforms earlier Gemini 2.0 models across benchmarks, including agentic coding tasks where it achieved ~63.8% on SWE-Bench Verified. It supports structured outputs, function calling, code execution, search grounding, and URL context, making it well-suited for enterprise, STEM, and developer workflows. However, it does not currently support image or audio generation in its stable release, and its higher computational cost and latency make it less efficient than Flash or Flash-Lite. It is available via the Gemini API, Google AI Studio, and Vertex AI.

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Gemini 3.8 Flash is a natively multimodal reasoning model in Google's Gemini 3 series, positioned as the speed and cost oriented Flash tier while targeting long-horizon software engineering, autonomous agents, and enterprise workflows. It accepts text, images, video, audio, and PDF documents in a single request and returns text, with an input limit of 1,048,576 tokens and an output limit of 65,536 tokens. Thinking is configurable at low, medium, and high levels, and the model supports function calling, code execution, structured outputs, context caching, search and Maps grounding, file search, and computer use in preview. Image generation, audio generation, and the Live API are not supported.

On vision oriented evaluations the model reports 86.2% on CharXiv Reasoning for chart and figure synthesis and 87.8% on LVBench for long video understanding in agentic mode, alongside 90.8% on Terminal-Bench 2.1 and 61.6% on SWE-Bench Pro for coding. Following Gemini API conventions, it can localize objects by emitting bounding boxes as [ymin, xmin, ymax, xmax] integers normalized to a 0 to 1000 range, which supports prompt driven detection and grounding in addition to captioning, document parsing, and visual question answering. The knowledge cutoff is March 2026, though coverage in some domains reflects the January 2025 cutoff shared across the Gemini 3 family.

Frequently Asked Questions

On Roboflow's Vision Evals, Gemini 3.8 Flash performed better. It scores higher on all five vision tasks and averages 79.8% (#7 of 63) against 57.6% (#40 of 63) for Gemini 2.5 Pro. These scores measure vision capabilities only; either model may perform differently on work outside this benchmark's tasks.

No. On the Vision Evals Reasoning benchmark at low effort, Gemini 3.8 Flash leads with 81.2% against 42.4%. This is the widest gap between the two models across the benchmark's tasks.

Gemini 3.8 Flash is cheaper to run. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals task mix it averaged $0.0045 per sample against $0.0051. Gemini 2.5 Pro is priced at $1.25 per 1M input tokens and $10.00 per 1M output; Gemini 3.8 Flash is priced at $0.83 per 1M input tokens and $4.13 per 1M output. Actual costs depend on your image sizes, prompts, and output length.

Gemini 2.5 Pro is faster. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals it averaged 6.8s per inference against 12.8s. Latency varies with image size, prompt length, and provider load, so treat these as relative rather than guaranteed figures.

Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for object detection and open prompts in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.