Roboflow

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

Compare Claude Sonnet 5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Object Detection, Open Prompt, OCR, Classification, and Image Captioning.

Compare Claude Sonnet 5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
AnthropicClaude Sonnet 5
Run to compare this model.
GoogleGemini 3.1 Pro
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro on Vision Evals

Gemini 3.1 Pro scores higher on all six Vision Evals tasks.

The widest gap is Object Detection, where Gemini 3.1 Pro leads 67.4% to 36.1%.

Overall, Claude Sonnet 5 averages 66.4% (#21 of 30) against 83.1% (#4 of 30) for Gemini 3.1 Pro.

Claude Sonnet 5 is both cheaper ($0.0064 vs $0.0093 per sample) and faster (4.8s vs 7.8s per sample).

Claude Sonnet 5Gemini 3.1 Pro

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Comparison Table

Evals updated August 14, 2026Pricing updated August 19, 2026

PropertyClaude Sonnet 5Gemini 3.1 Pro
OrganizationAnthropicGoogle
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateJun 2026Feb 2026
Context Window1.0M1.0M
Parameters
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$2.00$2.00
Output $/1M$10.00$12.00
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Chart Question Answering
ClassificationDemoDemo
Document Question Answering
Image Tagging
Multi-Label Classification
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Model Features
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
66.4%
83.1%
Avg cost / sample$0.0064$0.0093
Avg speed / sample4.84s7.81s
By task
Object Detection
36.1%
$0.011
67.4%
$0.010
Counting
56.8%
$0.0030
71.6%
$0.0071
Identification
81.3%
$0.0027
100.0%
$0.0070
OCR
91.7%
$0.0078
92.6%
$0.0066
Data Extraction
89.7%
$0.0030
94.8%
$0.0063
Reasoning (low)
43.0%
$0.0032
72.2%
$0.012
Reasoning (high)
43.0%
$0.0043
74.8%
$0.021

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: Overview

Claude Sonnet 5

Claude Sonnet 5 is a mid-tier large language model from Anthropic, released on June 30, 2026, as the latest model in the Sonnet series and a direct successor to Claude Sonnet 4.6. It is a hybrid reasoning model designed primarily for agentic workflows, software coding, and professional tasks. The model features a 1 million token context window, a 128k maximum output token limit, and runs adaptive thinking by default, giving API users fine-grained control over reasoning effort across five levels (low, medium, high, max, and extra-high). It uses an updated tokenizer shared with Opus 4.7 and later models, which produces approximately 30% more tokens for equivalent text compared to earlier Claude models. On benchmarks, Sonnet 5 scores 63.2% on agentic coding and 81.2% on OSWorld, narrowing the gap with Opus 4.8 while remaining at Sonnet-tier pricing.

The model supports text and image input with text output, and accepts tools including browsers and terminals for autonomous multi-step task execution. Anthropic's safety evaluations report that Sonnet 5 shows a lower rate of undesirable behaviors than Sonnet 4.6 and is generally safer in agentic contexts, with improved resistance to prompt injection and reduced sycophancy. Cybersecurity safeguards equivalent to those on Opus 4.7 and 4.8 are active, though Anthropic notes the model was not deliberately trained on cybersecurity tasks. The model is proprietary and API-only, with no open weights.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Gemini 3.1 Pro is a proprietary multimodal model from Google’s Gemini 3 series, released in early 2026 and designed for advanced reasoning across large multimodal datasets. It accepts text, images, audio, video, and documents, supporting up to a 1-million-token input context with up to 64k output tokens. Compared with Gemini 3 Pro, it improves long-context synthesis and multi-step reasoning, enabling more reliable analysis of large documents, datasets, and software codebases.

The model also advances visual understanding and grounding, allowing it to interpret UI screenshots, diagrams, and real-world scenes while referencing specific regions within images or video. These capabilities make Gemini 3.1 Pro well suited for multimodal workflows involving document processing, interface analysis, robotics research, and complex visual reasoning.

Frequently Asked Questions

On Roboflow's Vision Evals, Gemini 3.1 Pro performed better. It scores higher on all six vision tasks and averages 83.1% (#4 of 30) against 66.4% (#21 of 30) for Claude Sonnet 5. These scores measure vision capabilities only; either model may perform differently on work outside this benchmark's tasks.

No. On the Vision Evals Object Detection benchmark, Gemini 3.1 Pro leads with 67.4% against 36.1%. This is the widest gap between the two models across the benchmark's tasks.

Claude Sonnet 5 is cheaper to run. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals task mix it averaged $0.0064 per sample against $0.0093. Claude Sonnet 5 is priced at $2.00 per 1M input tokens and $10.00 per 1M output; Gemini 3.1 Pro is priced at $2.00 per 1M input tokens and $12.00 per 1M output. Actual costs depend on your image sizes, prompts, and output length.

Claude Sonnet 5 is faster. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals it averaged 4.8s per inference against 7.8s. Latency varies with image size, prompt length, and provider load, so treat these as relative rather than guaranteed figures.

Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for object detection and open prompts in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.