Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B

Compare Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Qwen3.5 122B A10B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, Open Prompt, and OCR.

Compare Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
AnthropicClaude Sonnet 4.6
Run to compare this model.
QwenQwen3.5 122B A10B
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B: Overview

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Claude Sonnet 4.6 is Anthropic's mid-tier large language model, released February 17, 2026, designed to balance performance, cost, and versatility for professional and developer use. It supports text and vision-based tasks with advanced reasoning, agentic capabilities, and Adaptive Thinking — a mode where the model dynamically scales its internal reasoning depth. A beta context window of up to 1,000,000 tokens (200K standard) enables processing of entire codebases or document collections in a single request. Parameters are undisclosed.

Optimized for coding, computer use, long-context reasoning, agent planning, and knowledge work, Sonnet 4.6 delivers a full generational upgrade over Sonnet 4.5 and approaches Opus 4.5-level performance across many benchmarks at a fraction of the cost. It is the default model on Claude.ai, Claude Cowork, and is available via API and major cloud platforms — making it well suited for production workloads requiring strong reasoning without flagship pricing.

Qwen3.5 122B A10B

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is a high-capacity multimodal Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model developed by Alibaba’s Qwen team as part of the Qwen3.5 model family. The architecture contains 122 billion total parameters while activating roughly 10 billion per token through sparse expert routing, allowing the model to balance large-scale reasoning ability with relatively efficient inference compared to dense models of similar size.

The model is designed to process both text and visual inputs within a unified multimodal framework, enabling tasks that require reasoning across images, documents, charts, and natural language. This makes it suitable for applications such as document understanding, diagram interpretation, and complex visual question answering.

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B supports a native context window of approximately 256,000 tokens, which can be extended further through techniques such as YaRN scaling to support very long-context workloads. Released under the Apache 2.0 license, it builds on earlier Qwen multimodal systems and provides developers with an open-weight model capable of handling demanding multimodal reasoning and analysis tasks.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B Comparison Table

PropertyClaude Sonnet 4.6Qwen3.5 122B A10B
OrganizationAnthropicQwen
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateFeb 2026Feb 2026
Context Window1.0M256K
Parameters122B
LicenseProprietaryApache 2.0
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$3.00$0.260
Output $/1M$15.00$2.08
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Object DetectionDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
ClassificationDemo
Model Features
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Foundation Vision
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
70.15%
76.12%
Avg Response Time4.24s1.77s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens2.2K1.2K
Median output tokens1057
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0080$0.0003
Defect Detection
80%(12/15)
86.7%(13/15)
Document Understanding
77.8%(7/9)
77.8%(7/9)
Object Counting
30%(3/10)
40%(4/10)
Object Understanding
71.4%(10/14)
92.9%(13/14)
Spatial Understanding
78.9%(15/19)
73.7%(14/19)
OCR
Overall Score
86.82%
Avg Response Time3.27s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens702
Median output tokens84
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0034
Focused Scene OCR
85.9%(85/99)
License Plate Recognition
90%(27/30)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology