Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B
Compare Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Qwen3.5 122B A10B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, Open Prompt, and OCR.
Compare Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Models in this comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B: Overview
Claude Sonnet 4.6 is Anthropic's mid-tier large language model, released February 17, 2026, designed to balance performance, cost, and versatility for professional and developer use. It supports text and vision-based tasks with advanced reasoning, agentic capabilities, and Adaptive Thinking — a mode where the model dynamically scales its internal reasoning depth. A beta context window of up to 1,000,000 tokens (200K standard) enables processing of entire codebases or document collections in a single request. Parameters are undisclosed.
Optimized for coding, computer use, long-context reasoning, agent planning, and knowledge work, Sonnet 4.6 delivers a full generational upgrade over Sonnet 4.5 and approaches Opus 4.5-level performance across many benchmarks at a fraction of the cost. It is the default model on Claude.ai, Claude Cowork, and is available via API and major cloud platforms — making it well suited for production workloads requiring strong reasoning without flagship pricing.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is a high-capacity multimodal Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model developed by Alibaba’s Qwen team as part of the Qwen3.5 model family. The architecture contains 122 billion total parameters while activating roughly 10 billion per token through sparse expert routing, allowing the model to balance large-scale reasoning ability with relatively efficient inference compared to dense models of similar size.
The model is designed to process both text and visual inputs within a unified multimodal framework, enabling tasks that require reasoning across images, documents, charts, and natural language. This makes it suitable for applications such as document understanding, diagram interpretation, and complex visual question answering.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B supports a native context window of approximately 256,000 tokens, which can be extended further through techniques such as YaRN scaling to support very long-context workloads. Released under the Apache 2.0 license, it builds on earlier Qwen multimodal systems and provides developers with an open-weight model capable of handling demanding multimodal reasoning and analysis tasks.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B Comparison Table
| Property | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Qwen3.5 122B A10B |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | Anthropic | Qwen |
| Category | closed | open |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Feb 2026 | Feb 2026 |
| Context Window | 1.0M | 256K |
| Parameters | 122B | |
| License | Proprietary | Apache 2.0 |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $3.00 | $0.260 |
| Output $/1M | $15.00 | $2.08 |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Captioning | Demo | Demo |
| Object Detection | Demo | |
| OCR | Demo | Demo |
| Vision Language | ||
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | Demo |
| Classification | Demo | |
| Model Features | ||
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | ||
| Multimodal Vision | ||
| Foundation Vision | ||
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts Score key:≥75%40–74%<40% | ||
| Visual Understanding | ||
| Overall Score | 70.15% | 76.12% |
| Avg Response Time | 4.24s | 1.77s |
| Median input tokensincl. image tokens | 2.2K | 1.2K |
| Median output tokens | 105 | 7 |
| Est. cost / taskon this benchmark | $0.0080 | $0.0003 |
| Defect Detection | 80%(12/15) | 86.7%(13/15) |
| Document Understanding | 77.8%(7/9) | 77.8%(7/9) |
| Object Counting | 30%(3/10) | 40%(4/10) |
| Object Understanding | 71.4%(10/14) | 92.9%(13/14) |
| Spatial Understanding | 78.9%(15/19) | 73.7%(14/19) |
| OCR | ||
| Overall Score | 86.82% | |
| Avg Response Time | 3.27s | |
| Median input tokensincl. image tokens | 702 | |
| Median output tokens | 84 | |
| Est. cost / taskon this benchmark | $0.0034 | |
| Focused Scene OCR | 85.9%(85/99) | |
| License Plate Recognition | 90%(27/30) | |
Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology