Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Grok 4
Compare Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Grok 4 side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, Open Prompt, and OCR.
Compare Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Grok 4 live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Models in this comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Grok 4: Overview
Claude Sonnet 4.6 is Anthropic's mid-tier large language model, released February 17, 2026, designed to balance performance, cost, and versatility for professional and developer use. It supports text and vision-based tasks with advanced reasoning, agentic capabilities, and Adaptive Thinking — a mode where the model dynamically scales its internal reasoning depth. A beta context window of up to 1,000,000 tokens (200K standard) enables processing of entire codebases or document collections in a single request. Parameters are undisclosed.
Optimized for coding, computer use, long-context reasoning, agent planning, and knowledge work, Sonnet 4.6 delivers a full generational upgrade over Sonnet 4.5 and approaches Opus 4.5-level performance across many benchmarks at a fraction of the cost. It is the default model on Claude.ai, Claude Cowork, and is available via API and major cloud platforms — making it well suited for production workloads requiring strong reasoning without flagship pricing.
Grok 4, released by xAI on July 9, 2025, is the fourth-generation model in the Grok family and the most advanced to date. It is multimodal, supporting text, vision, tool use, and real-time web search, with a reported 256,000-token context window for long-form reasoning and document analysis. Its training data extends through November 2024, making it the most up-to-date Grok model at launch.
The lineup includes Grok 4 Generalist for broad tasks, Grok 4 Heavy for higher-capacity reasoning, and Grok 4 Code optimized for programming and debugging. A notable feature is its always-on “Think” mode, designed for deeper multi-step reasoning. While xAI has not disclosed parameter counts, Grok 4 is positioned to compete with frontier models like GPT-5 and Claude 4, balancing real-time knowledge via web integration with structured tool use. It is best suited for coding, complex reasoning, and multimodal AI assistants.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Grok 4 Comparison Table
| Property | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | Anthropic | xAI |
| Category | closed | closed |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Feb 2026 | Jul 2025 |
| Context Window | 1.0M | 256K |
| Parameters | ||
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $3.00 | |
| Output $/1M | $15.00 | |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Captioning | Demo | Demo |
| Classification | Demo | |
| Object Detection | Demo | |
| OCR | Demo | Demo |
| Vision Language | ||
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | Demo |
| Model Features | ||
| Foundation Vision | ||
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | ||
| Multimodal Vision | ||
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts Score key:≥75%40–74%<40% | ||
| Visual Understanding | ||
| Overall Score | 70.15% | 52.24% |
| Avg Response Time | 4.24s | 85.24s |
| Median input tokensincl. image tokens | 2.2K | |
| Median output tokens | 105 | |
| Est. cost / taskon this benchmark | $0.0080 | |
| Defect Detection | 80%(12/15) | 80%(12/15) |
| Document Understanding | 77.8%(7/9) | 44.4%(4/9) |
| Object Counting | 30%(3/10) | 10%(1/10) |
| Object Understanding | 71.4%(10/14) | 57.1%(8/14) |
| Spatial Understanding | 78.9%(15/19) | 52.6%(10/19) |
| OCR | ||
| Overall Score | 81.66% | |
| Avg Response Time | 3.42s | |
| Median input tokensincl. image tokens | 736 | |
| Median output tokens | 85 | |
| Est. cost / taskon this benchmark | $0.0035 | |
| Focused Scene OCR | 85.9%(85/99) | |
| Handwritten Math | 50%(5/10) | |
| License Plate Recognition | 90%(27/30) | |
| Text Recognition | 86.7%(26/30) | |
| VQA & Extraction | 73.3%(44/60) | |
Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology