Roboflow

Claude Sonnet 4 vs Gemma 4 26B A4B

Gemma 4 26B A4B: 54.1% average across four Vision Evals tasks (#52 of 65 models). Claude Sonnet 4 is deprecated and was not run through Roboflow's Vision Evals, so there is no head-to-head score.

Compare Claude Sonnet 4 vs Gemma 4 26B A4B live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
AnthropicClaude Sonnet 4

Claude Sonnet 4 is deprecated and can no longer be run. Details and evals are still available on its model page.

GoogleGemma 4 26B A4B
Run to compare this model.

Claude Sonnet 4 vs Gemma 4 26B A4B Comparison Table

Evals updated October 26, 2026Pricing updated November 2, 2026

PropertyClaude Sonnet 4Gemma 4 26B A4B
OrganizationAnthropicGoogle
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateMay 2025Apr 2026
Context Window1.0M256K
ParametersUnknown25.2B
LicenseProprietaryApache 2.0
Commercial usecommercial use per vendor termsfree for commercial use
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1MNo published price$0.037
Output $/1MNo published price$0.111
Vision Tasks
CaptioningSupportedDemo
ClassificationSupportedDemo
Object DetectionSupportedDemo
OCRSupportedDemo
Visual Question AnsweringSupportedDemo
Both support 5 more tasks
Model Features
Both support 3 more features
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks
OverallDeprecated
54.1%*
Quantizationsself-hosted
BF1651.6%FP854.1%AWQ-INT452.0%hardware →
Avg cost / sample–$0.0019
Avg speed / sample–27.84s
By task
Object Detection–
44.2%
±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 43.5 to 44.8
$0
Counting–
43.2%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 41.9 to 46.0
$0
Identification–
81.3%
±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.1 to 84.4
$0
OCR––
by category
Reasoning–
47.7%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 45.0 to 49.0
$0

Claude Sonnet 4 vs Gemma 4 26B A4B: Overview

Claude Sonnet 4

Claude 4 Sonnet, released by Anthropic in May 2025, is the mid-tier model in the Claude 4 family, designed to balance capability, cost, and speed. It is multimodal, accepting both text and images, and extends beyond prior versions with improved “computer use” support, allowing API-driven interaction with desktop-like interfaces. By default, it supports 200,000 tokens of context, but as of August 2025, it also offers a 1 million-token context window in public beta—making it one of the most context-capable models available for processing entire codebases or large document sets in a single request.

Sonnet 4 is significantly cheaper than the flagship Opus while still demonstrating strong reasoning, coding, and instruction-following ability with reduced hallucinations. Its extended context capabilities and lower latency make it well-suited for enterprise-scale knowledge management, software development, research assistants, and productivity automation where both cost efficiency and high reliability are essential.

Gemma 4 26B A4B

Gemma 4 26B A4B is the Mixture-of-Experts variant in Google's Gemma 4 family, with 25.2B total parameters but only 3.8B active per token. Built from the same Gemini 3 research as the 31B dense sibling and released as open weights under the Apache 2.0 license, it supports a 256K token context window with text and image input and configurable thinking mode. The "A4B" in the name refers to its approximately 4B active parameters. The MoE design makes it significantly faster at inference than the dense 31B, running nearly as fast as a 4B-parameter model while delivering roughly 97% of the dense model's quality.

For vision tasks, the 26B A4B shares the same multimodal capabilities as the 31B image understanding with variable aspect ratios and resolutions, and structured bounding box output for UI element detection. The tradeoff versus the 31B dense model is a small quality reduction in exchange for much faster inference and lower hardware requirements, fitting in 18GB of VRAM at 4-bit quantization. It ranked #6 among open models on the Arena AI text leaderboard at launch.