Roboflow

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen3.6 27B

Qwen3.6 27B: 67.1% average across four Vision Evals tasks (#26 of 65 models). We have not run Claude Haiku 4.5 through Roboflow's Vision Evals, so there is no head-to-head score. Run both on your own image below.

Compare Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen3.6 27B live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
AnthropicClaude Haiku 4.5
Run to compare this model.
QwenQwen3.6 27B
Run to compare this model.

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen3.6 27B Comparison Table

Evals updated October 26, 2026Pricing updated November 8, 2026

PropertyClaude Haiku 4.5Qwen3.6 27B
OrganizationAnthropicQwen
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateOct 2025Apr 2026
Context Window200K262K
ParametersUnknown27B
LicenseProprietaryApache 2.0
Commercial usecommercial use per vendor termsfree for commercial use
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$1.00$0.320
Output $/1M$5.00$3.20
Vision Tasks
ClassificationDemoSupported
Object DetectionDemoNot listed
Video ClassificationNot listedSupported
Both support 8 more tasks
Model Features
Both support 3 more features
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks
OverallNot evaluated
67.1%*
Quantizationsself-hosted
BF1661.9%FP867.1%AWQ-INT461.5%hardware →
Avg cost / sample–$0.0021
Avg speed / sample–42.09s
By task
Object Detection–
59.7%
±0.9, Mean of 3 runs, range 59.0 to 60.8
$0
Counting–
67.1%
±4.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 62.2 to 71.6
$0
Identification–
82.3%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.3 to 84.4
$0
OCR––
by category
Reasoning–
59.2%
±1.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 57.6 to 60.9
$0

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen3.6 27B: Overview

Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5 is Anthropic’s lightweight model in the Claude 4.5 series, released in October 2025 under a proprietary license. Designed for speed and cost efficiency, it delivers near-frontier performance while maintaining Anthropic’s AI Safety Level 2 standard. Haiku 4.5 supports both text and multimodal (text and image) inputs, integrates tool use and extended reasoning, and features a 200,000 token context window, making it adept at handling long or complex workflows. Haiku 4.5 is ideal for developers and researchers seeking rapid, cost-effective model calls for analysis, coding, or multimodal understanding.

Qwen3.6 27B

Qwen3.6-27B is a dense 27-billion-parameter multimodal language model developed by Alibaba's Qwen team and released on April 22, 2026. It combines a causal language model with an integrated vision encoder, supporting text, image, and video inputs natively. The architecture employs a hybrid attention design that interleaves Gated DeltaNet linear attention blocks with standard Gated Attention layers across 64 transformer layers with a hidden dimension of 5,120. Unlike Mixture-of-Experts variants in the Qwen3.6 family, all 27 billion parameters are active on every inference pass, simplifying deployment and quantization. The model supports a native context window of 262,144 tokens, extensible to approximately 1,010,000 tokens via YaRN scaling. It is released under the Apache 2.0 license with open weights available on Hugging Face and ModelScope.

The model introduces two notable capabilities relative to prior Qwen releases: enhanced agentic coding support covering frontend workflows and repository-level reasoning, and a Thinking Preservation mechanism that retains chain-of-thought reasoning context across multi-turn conversation history to reduce redundant token generation in iterative agent sessions. It supports both a thinking mode for multi-step reasoning and a non-thinking mode for faster responses within a single model. Vision capabilities include chart understanding (CharXiv RQ: 78.4), OCR (CC-OCR: 81.2), and video understanding (VideoMME with subtitles: 87.7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Claude Haiku 4.5 is released under Proprietary, while Qwen3.6 27B uses Apache 2.0. In practice: Claude Haiku 4.5: commercial use per vendor terms; Qwen3.6 27B: free for commercial use. Licensing often matters more than raw accuracy for commercial deployments, so check the terms against how you plan to ship.

Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for image captioning and open prompts in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.