Roboflow

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Haiku 5.5

Compare Claude Haiku 4.5 and Claude Haiku 5.5 side-by-side.

Compare Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Haiku 5.5 live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

These models don't share enough common tasks for a side-by-side demo. See the comparison table below for their capabilities.

Models in this comparison

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Haiku 5.5 Comparison Table

Evals updated October 8, 2026Pricing updated October 8, 2026

PropertyClaude Haiku 4.5Claude Haiku 5.5
OrganizationAnthropicAnthropic
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateOct 2025Oct 2026
Context Window200K1.0M
ParametersUnknownundisclosed
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$1.00$0.100
Output $/1M$5.00$0.500
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoSupported
Chart Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
ClassificationDemoSupported
Document Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
Image TaggingSupportedSupported
Multi-Label ClassificationSupportedSupported
Object DetectionDemoSupported
OCRDemoSupported
Vision LanguageSupportedSupported
Visual Question AnsweringDemoSupported
Model Features
Foundation VisionSupportedSupported
LLMs with Vision CapabilitiesSupportedSupported
Multimodal VisionSupportedSupported
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
OverallNot evaluated
77.2%
Avg cost / sample–$0.0005
Avg speed / sample–13.23s
By task
Object Detection (low)–
65.8%
±0.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 65.1 to 66.2
$0.0006
Object Detection (high)–
68.2%
±1.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 67.2 to 69.2
$0.0010
Counting (low)–
68.9%
±4.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 64.9 to 74.3
$0.0003
Counting (high)–
73.0%
±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 71.6 to 74.3
$0.0004
Identification (low)–
83.3%
±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.3 to 87.5
$0.0002
Identification (high)–
86.5%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 84.4 to 87.5
$0.0003
OCR (low)–
90.1%
±1.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 88.8 to 91.0
$0.0006
OCR (high)–
88.0%
±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 87.0 to 89.6
$0.0009
Data Extraction (low)–
85.9%
±1.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 84.5 to 87.6
$0.0002
Data Extraction (high)–
87.3%
±0.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 86.6 to 87.6
$0.0002
Reasoning (low)–
68.9%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 66.9 to 70.9
$0.0004
Reasoning (high)–
74.8%
±2.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 72.2 to 77.5
$0.0006

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Haiku 5.5: Overview

Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5 is Anthropic’s lightweight model in the Claude 4.5 series, released in October 2025 under a proprietary license. Designed for speed and cost efficiency, it delivers near-frontier performance while maintaining Anthropic’s AI Safety Level 2 standard. Haiku 4.5 supports both text and multimodal (text and image) inputs, integrates tool use and extended reasoning, and features a 200,000 token context window, making it adept at handling long or complex workflows. Though the parameter count remains undisclosed, it achieves about 73.3% on SWE-bench Verified, reflecting strong coding and reasoning ability. Haiku 4.5 is ideal for developers and researchers seeking rapid, cost-effective model calls for analysis, coding, or multimodal understanding.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Claude Haiku 5.5 is a proprietary multimodal language model from Anthropic and the smallest member of the Claude 5.5 family, released on October 7, 2026 after Claude Opus 5.5 and Claude Sonnet 5.5. It accepts text and image input and returns text, with a 1M token context window and up to 128K output tokens per request. It is the first Haiku-class model with an adjustable effort parameter: adaptive thinking is on by default and the model decides how much to reason, steered by effort levels from low to max with medium as the default. Its training data cutoff is June 2026. Pricing starts at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens for prompts up to 100K tokens, which Anthropic reports is about 90% lower than Claude Haiku 4.5 for requests in that range.

Anthropic positions Haiku 5.5 for high-volume, latency-sensitive work such as classification, extraction, routing, summarization, and subagent tasks, and describes it as its fastest model to date at standard speed. On visual and agentic evaluations reported at launch, it scores 46.4% on Chartography, a chart reading benchmark, compared with 6.4% for Haiku 4.5 and 61.6% for Sonnet 5.5, and 72.4% on the offline subset of OSWorld 2.1, a screenshot driven computer use benchmark, compared with 15.7% for Haiku 4.5. It uses the same tokenizer as Claude Opus 4.7 and later models, so the same text counts as roughly 30% more tokens than on Haiku 4.5.