Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Haiku 5.5
Compare Claude Haiku 4.5 and Claude Haiku 5.5 side-by-side.
Compare Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Haiku 5.5 live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
These models don't share enough common tasks for a side-by-side demo. See the comparison table below for their capabilities.
Models in this comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Haiku 5.5 Comparison Table
Evals updated October 8, 2026Pricing updated October 8, 2026
| Property | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | Anthropic | Anthropic |
| Category | closed | closed |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Oct 2025 | Oct 2026 |
| Context Window | 200K | 1.0M |
| Parameters | Unknown | undisclosed |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $1.00 | $0.100 |
| Output $/1M | $5.00 | $0.500 |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Captioning | Demo | Supported |
| Chart Question Answering | Supported | Supported |
| Classification | Demo | Supported |
| Document Question Answering | Supported | Supported |
| Image Tagging | Supported | Supported |
| Multi-Label Classification | Supported | Supported |
| Object Detection | Demo | Supported |
| OCR | Demo | Supported |
| Vision Language | Supported | Supported |
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | Supported |
| Model Features | ||
| Foundation Vision | Supported | Supported |
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | Supported | Supported |
| Multimodal Vision | Supported | Supported |
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort | ||
| Overall | Not evaluated | 77.2% |
| Avg cost / sample | – | $0.0005 |
| Avg speed / sample | – | 13.23s |
| By task | ||
| Object Detection (low) | – | 65.8% ±0.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 65.1 to 66.2 |
| Object Detection (high) | – | 68.2% ±1.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 67.2 to 69.2 |
| Counting (low) | – | 68.9% ±4.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 64.9 to 74.3 |
| Counting (high) | – | 73.0% ±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 71.6 to 74.3 |
| Identification (low) | – | 83.3% ±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.3 to 87.5 |
| Identification (high) | – | 86.5% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 84.4 to 87.5 |
| OCR (low) | – | 90.1% ±1.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 88.8 to 91.0 |
| OCR (high) | – | 88.0% ±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 87.0 to 89.6 |
| Data Extraction (low) | – | 85.9% ±1.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 84.5 to 87.6 |
| Data Extraction (high) | – | 87.3% ±0.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 86.6 to 87.6 |
| Reasoning (low) | – | 68.9% ±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 66.9 to 70.9 |
| Reasoning (high) | – | 74.8% ±2.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 72.2 to 77.5 |
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Haiku 5.5: Overview
Claude Haiku 4.5 is Anthropic’s lightweight model in the Claude 4.5 series, released in October 2025 under a proprietary license. Designed for speed and cost efficiency, it delivers near-frontier performance while maintaining Anthropic’s AI Safety Level 2 standard. Haiku 4.5 supports both text and multimodal (text and image) inputs, integrates tool use and extended reasoning, and features a 200,000 token context window, making it adept at handling long or complex workflows. Though the parameter count remains undisclosed, it achieves about 73.3% on SWE-bench Verified, reflecting strong coding and reasoning ability. Haiku 4.5 is ideal for developers and researchers seeking rapid, cost-effective model calls for analysis, coding, or multimodal understanding.
Claude Haiku 5.5 is a proprietary multimodal language model from Anthropic and the smallest member of the Claude 5.5 family, released on October 7, 2026 after Claude Opus 5.5 and Claude Sonnet 5.5. It accepts text and image input and returns text, with a 1M token context window and up to 128K output tokens per request. It is the first Haiku-class model with an adjustable effort parameter: adaptive thinking is on by default and the model decides how much to reason, steered by effort levels from low to max with medium as the default. Its training data cutoff is June 2026. Pricing starts at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens for prompts up to 100K tokens, which Anthropic reports is about 90% lower than Claude Haiku 4.5 for requests in that range.
Anthropic positions Haiku 5.5 for high-volume, latency-sensitive work such as classification, extraction, routing, summarization, and subagent tasks, and describes it as its fastest model to date at standard speed. On visual and agentic evaluations reported at launch, it scores 46.4% on Chartography, a chart reading benchmark, compared with 6.4% for Haiku 4.5 and 61.6% for Sonnet 5.5, and 72.4% on the offline subset of OSWorld 2.1, a screenshot driven computer use benchmark, compared with 15.7% for Haiku 4.5. It uses the same tokenizer as Claude Opus 4.7 and later models, so the same text counts as roughly 30% more tokens than on Haiku 4.5.