Roboflow

Claude Opus 4.1 vs Grok 4

Compare Claude Opus 4.1 and Grok 4 side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Open Prompt, OCR, and Image Captioning.

Compare Claude Opus 4.1 vs Grok 4 live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
AnthropicClaude Opus 4.1
Run to compare this model.
GrokGrok 4
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Grok

Claude Opus 4.1 vs Grok 4: Overview

Claude Opus 4.1

Claude 4.1 Opus, released by Anthropic in August 2025, is the upgraded flagship of the Claude 4 family, building on Opus 4 with stronger reasoning and agentic capabilities. Like its predecessor, it is multimodal and optimized for text, code, and tool use, with support for large context windows suited to multi-file codebases, technical workflows, and long-horizon problem solving.

On benchmarks, Opus 4.1 improves coding performance, reaching ~74.5% on SWE-Bench Verified compared to Opus 4’s ~72.5%. It demonstrates more precise debugging, refactoring, and orchestration of agentic tasks while maintaining similar safety and alignment safeguards. It is best suited for enterprise-scale software development, research automation, and advanced reasoning workflows where reliability and depth of analysis are critical.

Grok 4

Grok 4, released by xAI on July 9, 2025, is the fourth-generation model in the Grok family and the most advanced to date. It is multimodal, supporting text, vision, tool use, and real-time web search, with a reported 256,000-token context window for long-form reasoning and document analysis. Its training data extends through November 2024, making it the most up-to-date Grok model at launch.

The lineup includes Grok 4 Generalist for broad tasks, Grok 4 Heavy for higher-capacity reasoning, and Grok 4 Code optimized for programming and debugging. A notable feature is its always-on “Think” mode, designed for deeper multi-step reasoning. While xAI has not disclosed parameter counts, Grok 4 is positioned to compete with frontier models like GPT-5 and Claude 4, balancing real-time knowledge via web integration with structured tool use. It is best suited for coding, complex reasoning, and multimodal AI assistants.

Claude Opus 4.1 vs Grok 4 Comparison Table

PropertyClaude Opus 4.1Grok 4
OrganizationAnthropicxAI
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateAug 2025Jul 2025
Context Window200K256K
Parameters
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$15.00
Output $/1M$75.00
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
ClassificationDemo
Object DetectionDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Model Features
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
59.7%
52.24%
Avg Response Time7.09s85.24s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens2.0K
Median output tokens140
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.040
Defect Detection
73.3%(11/15)
80%(12/15)
Document Understanding
88.9%(8/9)
44.4%(4/9)
Object Counting
0%(0/10)
10%(1/10)
Object Understanding
64.3%(9/14)
57.1%(8/14)
Spatial Understanding
63.2%(12/19)
52.6%(10/19)
OCR
Overall Score
68.56%
Avg Response Time5.08s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens552
Median output tokens97
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.016
Focused Scene OCR
73.7%(73/99)
Handwritten Math
30%(3/10)
License Plate Recognition
53.3%(16/30)
Text Recognition
80%(24/30)
VQA & Extraction
68.3%(41/60)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology