Qwen3.5 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max
Compare Qwen3.5 27B and Qwen3.8 Max side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, Open Prompt, Classification, Object Detection, and OCR.
Compare Qwen3.5 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Models in this comparison
Qwen3.5 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max on Vision Evals
Qwen3.8 Max scores higher on all six Vision Evals tasks.
The widest gap is Reasoning, where Qwen3.8 Max leads 73.5% to 31.8%.
Overall, Qwen3.5 27B averages 64.3% (#21 of 24) against 84.0% (#2 of 24) for Qwen3.8 Max.
Qwen3.5 27B is both cheaper ($0.0007 vs $0.0074 per sample) and faster (7.4s vs 18.0s per sample).
Qwen3.5 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max Comparison Table
Evals updated August 3, 2026Pricing updated August 5, 2026
| Property | Qwen3.5 27B | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | Qwen | Qwen |
| Category | open | closed |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Feb 2026 | Aug 2026 |
| Context Window | 262K | 984K |
| Parameters | 27B | 2.4T total, ~95B active |
| License | Apache 2.0 | Apache 2.0 |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $0.195 | $2.00 |
| Output $/1M | $1.56 | $6.00 |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Captioning | Demo | Demo |
| Chart Question Answering | ||
| Classification | Demo | Demo |
| Document Question Answering | ||
| Image Tagging | ||
| Multi-Label Classification | ||
| Object Detection | Demo | Demo |
| OCR | Demo | Demo |
| Vision Language | ||
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | Demo |
| Model Features | ||
| Foundation Vision | ||
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | ||
| Multimodal Vision | ||
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort | ||
| Overall | 64.3% | 84.0% |
| Avg cost / sample | $0.0007 | $0.0074 |
| Avg speed / sample | 7.38s | 18.02s |
| By task | ||
| Object Detection | 58.8% $0.0013 | 77.1% $0.013 |
| Counting | 54.0% $0.0002 | 82.4% $0.0046 |
| Identification | 78.1% $0.0002 | 90.6% $0.0027 |
| OCR | 84.5% $0.0009 | 92.8% $0.0056 |
| Data Extraction | 78.3% $0.0002 | 87.6% $0.0029 |
| Reasoning (low) | 31.8% $0.0002 | 73.5% $0.0047 |
| Reasoning (high) | 61.6% $0.0065 | 80.8% $0.011 |
Qwen3.5 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max: Overview
Qwen3.5-27B is a multimodal dense hybrid model developed by Alibaba Cloud’s Qwen team and released in February 2026 as a high-precision entry in the Qwen3.5 "Medium" series. Unlike its Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) siblings, the 27B model utilizes a dense architecture combining Gated Delta Networks with a feed-forward structure, activating its full parameter suite for every inference to maximize reliability. This design provides the highest instruction-following and coding accuracy in its class, with a notable IFEval score of 95.0. The model features a native 262K-token context window, extensible to 1M tokens via YaRN (RoPE scaling), and is released under the Apache-2.0 license.
Optimized for agentic workflows, Qwen3.5-27B employs an early-fusion architecture that treats visual and textual data as a unified stream for deep cross-modal reasoning. This unified approach allows the model to excel in technical analysis and software engineering, matching GPT-5-mini with a 72.4% score on SWE-bench Verified. While the larger MoE variants in the family lead in raw knowledge benchmarks, the 27B model offers a stable and high-density alternative for structured data extraction and spatial perception, contributing to the Qwen3.5 family’s generational leap in OCR accuracy over the previous Qwen3-VL series.
Qwen3.8 Max is the flagship tier of Alibaba's Qwen3.8 family, a sparse mixture-of-experts multimodal model with roughly 2.4 trillion total parameters of which about 95 billion activate per token, which keeps serving cost and latency well below what the total parameter count would imply. It builds on the architectural foundation established by Qwen3.5 and accepts text, images, video, and documents as input while producing text output. Reported context handling reaches close to one million tokens, with a maximum generation length of 131,072 tokens, so the model is aimed at long-horizon agentic work such as repository-scale coding, multi-step research, data analysis, and office document workflows.
For vision work the model performs image and video understanding, document and chart interpretation, text recognition inside images, and grounded visual question answering, and Alibaba reports gains concentrated in multimodal and agentic evaluation categories rather than general reasoning. Published figures include 86.6 on Terminal-Bench 2.1, 67.7 on SWE-bench Pro, 93.0 on PaperBench, 82.8 on IFBench, and 92.6 on GPQA Diamond. It is the first model in the Max tier of the Qwen line for which the team states weights will be released publicly, alongside a smaller Qwen3.8 27B checkpoint. No training or safety model card has been published.
Frequently Asked Questions
On Roboflow's Vision Evals, Qwen3.8 Max performed better. It scores higher on all six vision tasks and averages 84.0% (#2 of 24) against 64.3% (#21 of 24) for Qwen3.5 27B. These scores measure vision capabilities only; either model may perform differently on work outside this benchmark's tasks.
No. On the Vision Evals Reasoning benchmark at low effort, Qwen3.8 Max leads with 73.5% against 31.8%. This is the widest gap between the two models across the benchmark's tasks.
Qwen3.5 27B is cheaper to run. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals task mix it averaged $0.0007 per sample against $0.0074. Qwen3.5 27B is priced at $0.20 per 1M input tokens and $1.56 per 1M output; Qwen3.8 Max is priced at $2.00 per 1M input tokens and $6.00 per 1M output. Actual costs depend on your image sizes, prompts, and output length.
Qwen3.5 27B is faster. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals it averaged 7.4s per inference against 18.0s. Latency varies with image size, prompt length, and provider load, so treat these as relative rather than guaranteed figures.
Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for image captioning and open prompts in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.