Muse Wonder vs SAM 3
Compare Muse Wonder and SAM 3 side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Object Detection.
Compare Muse Wonder vs SAM 3 live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Models in this comparison
Muse Wonder vs SAM 3 Comparison Table
Evals updated October 13, 2026Pricing updated October 13, 2026
| Property | Muse Wonder | SAM 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | Meta | Meta |
| Category | closed | open |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Oct 2026 | Nov 2025 |
| Context Window | 1.0M | — |
| Parameters | undisclosed | Unknown |
| License | Proprietary | Custom |
| Commercial use | commercial use per vendor terms | See license terms |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $4.00 | No published price |
| Output $/1M | $20.00 | No published price |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Object Detection | Demo | Demo |
| Captioning | Demo | Not listed |
| Chart Question Answering | Supported | Not listed |
| Classification | Demo | Not listed |
| Document Question Answering | Supported | Not listed |
| Image Tagging | Supported | Not listed |
| Instance Segmentation | Not listed | Supported |
| Multi-Label Classification | Supported | Not listed |
| OCR | Demo | Not listed |
| Open Vocabulary Object Detection | Not listed | Supported |
| Promptable Concept Segmentation | Not listed | Demo |
| Video Object Tracking | Not listed | Supported |
| Vision Language | Supported | Not listed |
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | Not listed |
| Zero Shot Segmentation | Not listed | Supported |
| Model Features | ||
| Foundation Vision | Supported | Supported |
| Multimodal Vision | Supported | Supported |
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | Supported | Not listed |
| Zero-shot Detection | Not listed | Supported |
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort | ||
| Overall | 78.8% | Not evaluated |
| Avg cost / sample | $0.034 | – |
| Avg speed / sample | 11.68s | – |
| By task | ||
| Object Detection (low) | 65.1% ±0.8, Mean of 3 runs, range 64.5 to 66.0 | – |
| Object Detection (high) | 66.0% ±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 65.2 to 66.5 | – |
| Counting (low) | 76.6% ±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 75.7 to 78.4 | – |
| Counting (high) | 79.7% ±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.4 to 81.1 | – |
| Identification (low) | 92.7% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 90.6 to 93.8 | – |
| Identification (high) | 90.6% ±0.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 90.6 to 90.6 | – |
| OCR (low) | 74.3% | – |
| by category |
| |
| OCR (high) | 76.0% | – |
| by category |
| |
| Reasoning (low) | 85.2% ±0.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 84.8 to 85.4 | – |
| Reasoning (high) | 83.4% ±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 82.8 to 84.1 | – |
Muse Wonder vs SAM 3: Overview
Muse Wonder is a proprietary multimodal reasoning model from Meta, released on October 12, 2026 as the first step past the Muse Spark line on Meta's scaling ladder. It launched together with Muse Wonder Full, a larger configuration that is available only through Muse Code subscription plans, while Muse Wonder itself is served through the Meta Model API under the identifier muse-wonder-1.0. The model accepts text, images, video, audio, and PDF documents as input and returns text, with a context window of 1,048,576 tokens and graded reasoning effort settings. Meta trained both models at its Prometheus data center on larger base models than Muse Spark 1.3, and attributes their gains on unfamiliar tasks to post-training that transfers more effectively from a stronger base.
Meta positions Muse Wonder for long-running personal and professional agents: it plans multi-step work, delegates to sub-agents, calls tools in parallel, recovers from errors, and operates browsers and desktop or mobile applications. Two training objectives shape this behaviour. Active Memory carries goals, constraints, and earlier decisions across conversations and retrieves the details relevant to the current step, and Active Focus keeps the model trying alternative approaches when a task gets difficult while asking for clarification before important actions. Visual inputs such as screenshots, charts, and video feed the same reasoning loop, and the model emits bounding box coordinates for grounding queries. Meta's model card lists visual and spatial reasoning, especially 3D tasks, as a known limitation and recommends validating performance for applications that depend on precise spatial understanding.
Released on November 19th, 2025, Segment Anything 3 (SAM 3) is a zero-shot image segmentation model that “detects, segments, and tracks objects in images and videos based on concept prompts.” This model was developed by Meta as the third model in the Segment Anything series.
Unlike its previous SAM models (Segment Anything and Segment Anything 2), you can provide SAM 3 with the prompt “shipping container” and it will generate precise segmentation masks for all shipping containers in an image. SAM 3 generates segmentation masks that correspond to the location of the objects found with a text prompt.
Frequently Asked Questions
SAM 3 has not yet been evaluated on Roboflow's current Vision Evals, so this comparison shows specs, licensing, and pricing rather than benchmark scores.
Muse Wonder is released under Proprietary, while SAM 3 uses Custom. In practice: Muse Wonder — commercial use per vendor terms. Licensing often matters more than raw accuracy for commercial deployments, so check the terms against how you plan to ship.
Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for object detection in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.