Muse Glimmer 30B vs SAM 3
Compare Muse Glimmer 30B and SAM 3 side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Object Detection.
Compare Muse Glimmer 30B vs SAM 3 live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Models in this comparison
Muse Glimmer 30B vs SAM 3 Comparison Table
Evals updated August 14, 2026Pricing updated August 15, 2026
| Property | Muse Glimmer 30B | SAM 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | Meta | Meta |
| Category | open | open |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Aug 2026 | Nov 2025 |
| Context Window | 131K | — |
| Parameters | 29.6B | |
| License | Apache 2.0 | Custom |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $0.350 | |
| Output $/1M | $1.50 | |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Object Detection | Demo | Demo |
| Captioning | Demo | |
| Chart Question Answering | ||
| Classification | Demo | |
| Document Question Answering | ||
| Image Tagging | ||
| Instance Segmentation | ||
| Multi-Label Classification | ||
| OCR | Demo | |
| Open Vocabulary Object Detection | ||
| Promptable Concept Segmentation | Demo | |
| Video Object Tracking | ||
| Vision Language | ||
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | |
| Zero Shot Segmentation | ||
| Model Features | ||
| Foundation Vision | ||
| Multimodal Vision | ||
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | ||
| Zero-shot Detection | ||
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort | ||
| Overall | 70.8% | Not evaluated |
| Avg cost / sample | $0.0013 | – |
| Avg speed / sample | 8.70s | – |
| By task | ||
| Object Detection | 41.0% $0.0020 | – |
| Counting | 66.2% $0.0008 | – |
| Identification | 81.3% $0.0006 | – |
| OCR | 92.1% $0.0012 | – |
| Data Extraction | 86.6% $0.0007 | – |
| Reasoning (low) | 57.6% $0.0010 | – |
| Reasoning (high) | 62.9% $0.0033 | – |
Muse Glimmer 30B vs SAM 3: Overview
Muse Glimmer 30B is a dense vision language model from Meta built for long-horizon agentic work on local hardware. The architecture pairs a 52-layer causal text decoder with a roughly 1.8B parameter ViT-G/14 perception encoder for about 29.6 billion parameters in total, and it accepts interleaved text and image input so an agent can interpret screenshots, charts, and documents alongside conversation. The decoder uses grouped-query attention with 32 query heads and 2 key-value heads, a repeating pattern of three sliding-window local attention layers followed by one global layer, SwiGLU feed-forward blocks, and rotary position embeddings applied on the local layers, supporting a trained context of 131,072 tokens.
Meta describes the model as distilled from the larger Muse Spark and trained and evaluated around agentic behavior: end-to-end task completion, schema-accurate tool calling, multi-step reasoning across extended workflows, and recovery when a tool call returns an unexpected result. Reasoning effort is selectable across low, medium, high, and xhigh settings, and the model emits channel-scoped reasoning traces together with XML style tool calls rather than JSON, which requires parsers specific to this family. A companion block-diffusion drafter head predicts blocks of 16 tokens per forward pass for speculative decoding, with the main model verifying the proposals in parallel.
Released on November 19th, 2025, Segment Anything 3 (SAM 3) is a zero-shot image segmentation model that “detects, segments, and tracks objects in images and videos based on concept prompts.” This model was developed by Meta as the third model in the Segment Anything series.
Unlike its previous SAM models (Segment Anything and Segment Anything 2), you can provide SAM 3 with the prompt “shipping container” and it will generate precise segmentation masks for all shipping containers in an image. SAM 3 generates segmentation masks that correspond to the location of the objects found with a text prompt.
Frequently Asked Questions
SAM 3 has not yet been evaluated on Roboflow's current Vision Evals, so this comparison shows specs, licensing, and pricing rather than benchmark scores.
Muse Glimmer 30B is released under Apache 2.0, while SAM 3 uses Custom. Licensing often matters more than raw accuracy for commercial deployments, so check the terms against how you plan to ship.
Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for object detection in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.