Roboflow

MiMo V2.6 Flash vs Muse Ember

Muse Ember and MiMo V2.6 Flash score 76.6% vs 49.2% averaged across five Vision Evals tasks (#16 and #59 of 67 models), so Muse Ember leads overall.

  • Muse Ember wins all 5 tasks, with its widest lead on reasoning (78.2% vs 33.1%).
  • MiMo V2.6 Flash is about a third of the cost: $0.0003 vs $0.0009 overall average cost per sample.
  • Muse Ember is faster: 6.1s vs 16.3s per sample.

Compare MiMo V2.6 Flash vs Muse Ember live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

These models don't share enough common tasks for a side-by-side demo. See the comparison table below for their capabilities.

MiMo V2.6 Flash vs Muse Ember on Vision Evals

Score by taskMiMo V2.6 FlashMuse Ember
Reasoning
33.1
78.2
Counting
49.5
79.7
Object Detection
37.8
63.8
OCR
49.7
69.5
Identification
76.0
91.7

Roboflow Vision Evals. Full breakdown below.

MiMo V2.6 Flash vs Muse Ember Comparison Table

Evals updated November 10, 2026Pricing updated November 10, 2026

PropertyMiMo V2.6 FlashMuse Ember
OrganizationXiaomiMeta
Categoryopenclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateSep 2026Nov 2026
Context Window1.0M1.0M
Parameters309B total, 15B activeUnknown
LicenseMITProprietary
Commercial usefree for commercial usecommercial use per vendor terms
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.140$0.100
Output $/1M$0.280$0.500
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoSupported
ClassificationDemoSupported
Object DetectionDemoSupported
OCRDemoSupported
Visual Question AnsweringDemoSupported
Both support 5 more tasks
Model Features
Both support 3 more features
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
49.2%
76.6%
Avg cost / sample$0.0003$0.0009
Avg speed / sample16.34s6.08s
By task
Object Detection (low)
37.8%
±1.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 36.4 to 38.7
$0.0004
63.8%
±0.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 63.3 to 64.3
$0.0011
Object Detection (high)
45.0%
±2.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 42.2 to 47.1
$0.0009
64.0%
±0.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 63.5 to 64.5
$0.0017
Counting (low)
49.5%
±8.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 41.9 to 58.1
$0.0002
79.7%
±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.4 to 81.1
$0.0006
Counting (high)
64.9%
±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 63.5 to 66.2
$0.0003
79.3%
±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.4 to 79.7
$0.0011
Identification (low)
76.0%
±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 71.9 to 78.1
$0.0001
91.7%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 90.6 to 93.8
$0.0004
Identification (high)
82.3%
±4.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.1 to 87.5
$0.0003
90.6%
±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 87.5 to 93.8
$0.0007
OCR (low)
49.7%
$0.0004
69.5%
$0.0010
by category
Single value
41.7%
Transcription
72.5%
Structured JSON
68.6%
Text localization
9.2%
Single value
61.7%
Transcription
95.5%
Structured JSON
85.1%
Text localization
35.3%
OCR (high)
50.4%
$0.0012
70.5%
$0.0017
by category
Single value
42.2%
Transcription
68.9%
Structured JSON
69.2%
Text localization
13.2%
Single value
63.0%
Transcription
90.2%
Structured JSON
87.2%
Text localization
35.9%
Reasoning (low)
33.1%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 31.1 to 35.1
$0.0002
78.2%
±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 76.8 to 79.5
$0.0006
Reasoning (high)
58.5%
±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 57.0 to 59.6
$0.0008
81.9%
±1.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 80.1 to 83.4
$0.0013

MiMo V2.6 Flash vs Muse Ember: Overview

MiMo V2.6 Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the efficiency-oriented checkpoint of Xiaomi's MiMo-V2.6 series, a natively omnimodal foundation model that accepts text, image, video, and audio in a single model and supports a one million token context window. The language backbone is a sparse mixture-of-experts transformer with roughly 309 billion total parameters and 15 billion activated per token, organized as 48 layers with 256 routed experts and top-8 routing. It uses a hybrid attention scheme that interleaves sliding window attention with global attention layers to cut key-value cache cost on long sequences, and pairs the backbone with a vision encoder, an audio encoder, and an audio tokenizer, plus a multi-token prediction module and a draft model for faster decoding.

Training emphasizes large scale reinforcement learning on verifiable, long-horizon tasks, with RL compute, environment diversity, and grader compute scaled together in a single mixed run.

Muse Ember

Muse Ember is a proprietary multimodal reasoning model from Meta, released on November 9, 2026. It accepts text, images, video, audio, and PDF documents and returns text. The Meta Model API serves it as muse-ember-1.0, with a 1,048,576-token context window and up to 524,288 output tokens. Reasoning effort is adjustable from minimal to max.

Meta positions Ember for repeated tasks within larger agent workflows: tool calls, routing, coding subtasks, and processing collections of images and documents. It can caption or sort photos and extract fields from records while a larger Muse model handles planning. Meta recommends Spark or Wonder for harder single-shot coding and knowledge-heavy problems. Ember is available as a hosted model; its weights are not publicly released.

Frequently Asked Questions

On Roboflow's Vision Evals, Muse Ember performed better. It scores higher on all five vision tasks and averages 76.6% (#16 of 67) against 49.2% (#59 of 67) for MiMo V2.6 Flash. These scores measure vision capabilities only; either model may perform differently on work outside this benchmark's tasks.

No. On the Vision Evals Reasoning benchmark at low effort, Muse Ember leads with 78.2% against 33.1%. This is the widest gap between the two models across the benchmark's tasks.

MiMo V2.6 Flash is cheaper to run. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals task mix it averaged $0.0003 per sample against $0.0009. MiMo V2.6 Flash is priced at $0.14 per 1M input tokens and $0.28 per 1M output; Muse Ember is priced at $0.10 per 1M input tokens and $0.50 per 1M output. Actual costs depend on your image sizes, prompts, and output length.

Muse Ember is faster. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals it averaged 6.1s per inference against 16.3s. Latency varies with image size, prompt length, and provider load, so treat these as relative rather than guaranteed figures.