Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Compare Llama 4 Scout and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, OCR, and Open Prompt.
Compare Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Models in this comparison
Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct: Overview
Llama 4 Scout, released on April 5, 2025, is one of Meta AI’s first Llama 4 multimodal models, alongside Maverick. It accepts text + image inputs and produces text outputs, with a knowledge cutoff of August 2024. Scout is notable for its extremely large context window of 10 million tokens, making it well-suited for analyzing very long documents, extended conversations, or large codebases.
Architecturally, Scout uses a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) system with 16 experts, activating ~17B parameters per inference from a pool of ~109B total parameters, balancing capacity with efficiency. It officially supports 12 languages (including English, Arabic, French, Hindi, and Spanish), while offering multimodal reasoning for images (captioning, Q&A, recognition). Meta highlights that Scout can run on a single Nvidia H100 GPU, making it more accessible than larger-scale Llama 4 models. However, its output token limit is far smaller than its 10M input window, image input support is still constrained, and license restrictions apply for large-scale commercial deployments.
Qwen2.5-VL-7B-Instruct is a 7-billion parameter vision-language model from Alibaba’s QwenLM team, released on January 26, 2025 under the Apache 2.0 license. It is the instruction-tuned variant of the 7B scale in the Qwen2.5-VL family, designed to process multimodal inputs such as text, images, charts, documents, and video. The model enables structured outputs—including JSON for structured content and bounding boxes for visual localization. Weights are publicly available on Hugging Face and GitHub, making it suitable for both research and applied multimodal use.
Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct Comparison Table
| Property | Llama 4 Scout | Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | Meta | Qwen |
| Category | open | open |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Apr 2025 | Jan 2025 |
| Context Window | 10.0M | 33K |
| Parameters | 109B | 7B |
| License | Proprietary | Apache 2.0 |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $0.100 | |
| Output $/1M | $0.300 | |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Captioning | Demo | Demo |
| Object Detection | ||
| OCR | Demo | Demo |
| Vision Language | ||
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | Demo |
| Model Features | ||
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | ||
| Multimodal Vision | ||
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts Score key:≥75%40–74%<40% | ||
| Visual Understanding | ||
| Overall Score | 67.16% | 52.24% |
| Avg Response Time | 43.93s | 47.64s |
| Defect Detection | 73.3%(11/15) | 60%(9/15) |
| Document Understanding | 88.9%(8/9) | 77.8%(7/9) |
| Object Counting | 20%(2/10) | 0%(0/10) |
| Object Understanding | 71.4%(10/14) | 57.1%(8/14) |
| Spatial Understanding | 73.7%(14/19) | 57.9%(11/19) |
| OCR | ||
| Overall Score | 70.74% | |
| Avg Response Time | 0.74s | |
| Median input tokensincl. image tokens | 472 | |
| Median output tokens | 12 | |
| Est. cost / taskon this benchmark | $0.0001 | |
| Focused Scene OCR | 56.6%(56/99) | |
| Handwritten Math | 70%(7/10) | |
| License Plate Recognition | 93.3%(28/30) | |
| Text Recognition | 80%(24/30) | |
| VQA & Extraction | 78.3%(47/60) | |