Llama 4 Maverick vs Muse Glimmer 30B
Compare Llama 4 Maverick and Muse Glimmer 30B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, OCR, and Open Prompt.
Compare Llama 4 Maverick vs Muse Glimmer 30B live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Models in this comparison
Llama 4 Maverick vs Muse Glimmer 30B Comparison Table
Evals updated August 14, 2026Pricing updated August 15, 2026
| Property | Llama 4 Maverick | Muse Glimmer 30B |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | Meta | Meta |
| Category | open | open |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Apr 2025 | Aug 2026 |
| Context Window | 1.0M | 131K |
| Parameters | 400B | 29.6B |
| License | Custom | Apache 2.0 |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $0.200 | $0.350 |
| Output $/1M | $0.800 | $1.50 |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Captioning | Demo | Demo |
| Chart Question Answering | ||
| Classification | Demo | |
| Document Question Answering | ||
| Image Tagging | ||
| Multi-Label Classification | ||
| Object Detection | Demo | |
| OCR | Demo | Demo |
| Vision Language | ||
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | Demo |
| Model Features | ||
| Foundation Vision | ||
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | ||
| Multimodal Vision | ||
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort | ||
| Overall | Not evaluated | 70.8% |
| Avg cost / sample | – | $0.0013 |
| Avg speed / sample | – | 8.70s |
| By task | ||
| Object Detection | – | 41.0% $0.0020 |
| Counting | – | 66.2% $0.0008 |
| Identification | – | 81.3% $0.0006 |
| OCR | – | 92.1% $0.0012 |
| Data Extraction | – | 86.6% $0.0007 |
| Reasoning (low) | – | 57.6% $0.0010 |
| Reasoning (high) | – | 62.9% $0.0033 |
Llama 4 Maverick vs Muse Glimmer 30B: Overview
Llama 4 Maverick, introduced on April 5, 2025, is one of the first models in Meta’s Llama 4 family, designed as a natively multimodal model supporting text + image inputs with text outputs. It employs a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture with 128 experts, activating ~17B parameters per token out of a pool of ~400B total parameters. This design improves scalability, efficiency, and reasoning capacity. Maverick has a 1M-token context window, enabling it to handle large documents, extended conversations, and multimodal reasoning. Its knowledge cutoff is August 2024.
The model is released under the Llama 4 Community License and comes in both base and instruction-tuned (“Instruct”) versions. Maverick is widely deployed via Hugging Face, Google Vertex AI, Amazon Bedrock, and Oracle Cloud, making it one of the most accessible large open-weight models. However, it outputs text only (no image/audio generation) and, while input capacity is huge, output limits are typically much smaller. The MoE design also raises hardware demands, as maintaining 128 experts requires significant compute resources, and Meta’s license introduces restrictions around commercial-scale use.
Muse Glimmer 30B is a dense vision language model from Meta built for long-horizon agentic work on local hardware. The architecture pairs a 52-layer causal text decoder with a roughly 1.8B parameter ViT-G/14 perception encoder for about 29.6 billion parameters in total, and it accepts interleaved text and image input so an agent can interpret screenshots, charts, and documents alongside conversation. The decoder uses grouped-query attention with 32 query heads and 2 key-value heads, a repeating pattern of three sliding-window local attention layers followed by one global layer, SwiGLU feed-forward blocks, and rotary position embeddings applied on the local layers, supporting a trained context of 131,072 tokens.
Meta describes the model as distilled from the larger Muse Spark and trained and evaluated around agentic behavior: end-to-end task completion, schema-accurate tool calling, multi-step reasoning across extended workflows, and recovery when a tool call returns an unexpected result. Reasoning effort is selectable across low, medium, high, and xhigh settings, and the model emits channel-scoped reasoning traces together with XML style tool calls rather than JSON, which requires parsers specific to this family. A companion block-diffusion drafter head predicts blocks of 16 tokens per forward pass for speculative decoding, with the main model verifying the proposals in parallel.