Grounded SAM vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Compare Grounded SAM and Qwen3.5 397B A17B side-by-side.
Compare Grounded SAM vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
These models don't share enough common tasks for a side-by-side demo. See the comparison table below for their capabilities.
Models in this comparison
Grounded SAM vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B: Overview
Grounded SAM is an open-vocabulary image segmentation model developed by IDEA Research, released in January 2024 under the Apache 2.0 license. It combines Grounding DINO, a zero-shot open-vocabulary object detector, with the Segment Anything Model to produce precise segmentation masks for objects identified through free-form text prompts. The two models are used sequentially: Grounding DINO localizes objects from a text query, and SAM generates the corresponding segmentation masks.
Grounded SAM enables zero-shot instance segmentation without task-specific training data, making it applicable to domains where labeled segmentation data is scarce. It supports arbitrary text queries and can segment objects not represented in standard training sets. The model is commonly used in automated labeling pipelines, robotic perception, and domain-specific vision applications requiring open-vocabulary segmentation.
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is a 397B-parameter (17B active) open-weight multimodal model developed by Alibaba’s Qwen team, released on 2026-02-16 under Apache-2.0. It supports text and image inputs with text outputs, combining a sparse Mixture-of-Experts architecture with Gated Delta Networks for efficient scaling. The model provides native vision-language reasoning and a large ~262K token context window, extendable to ~1M tokens.
As the first open-weight release in the Qwen3.5 family, it positions itself as a high-capacity, long-context alternative in the large vision-language space, balancing scale and efficiency via sparse activation. It is designed for advanced reasoning, coding, agent workflows, and multimodal understanding tasks.
Grounded SAM vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B Comparison Table
| Property | Grounded SAM | Qwen3.5 397B A17B |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | IDEA Research | Qwen |
| Category | open | open |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Jan 2024 | Feb 2026 |
| Context Window | — | 262K |
| Parameters | 397B | |
| License | Apache 2.0 | Apache 2.0 |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $0.385 | |
| Output $/1M | $2.45 | |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Vision Language | ||
| Captioning | Demo | |
| Object Detection | ||
| OCR | Demo | |
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | |
| Zero Shot Segmentation | ||
| Model Features | ||
| Multimodal Vision | ||
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | ||
| Zero-shot Detection | ||
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts Score key:≥75%40–74%<40% | ||
| Overall Score | 58.21% | |
| Avg Response Time | 56.61s | |
| Median input tokensincl. image tokens | 1.1K | |
| Median output tokens | 54 | |
| Est. cost / taskon this benchmark | $0.0006 | |
| Defect Detection | 66.7%(10/15) | |
| Document Understanding | 77.8%(7/9) | |
| Object Counting | 20%(2/10) | |
| Object Understanding | 64.3%(9/14) | |
| Spatial Understanding | 57.9%(11/19) | |
Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology