Grounded SAM vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Compare Grounded SAM and Qwen3.5 397B A17B side-by-side.

Compare Grounded SAM vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

These models don't share enough common tasks for a side-by-side demo. See the comparison table below for their capabilities.

Models in this comparison

Grounded SAM vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B: Overview

Grounded SAM

Grounded SAM is an open-vocabulary image segmentation model developed by IDEA Research, released in January 2024 under the Apache 2.0 license. It combines Grounding DINO, a zero-shot open-vocabulary object detector, with the Segment Anything Model to produce precise segmentation masks for objects identified through free-form text prompts. The two models are used sequentially: Grounding DINO localizes objects from a text query, and SAM generates the corresponding segmentation masks.

Grounded SAM enables zero-shot instance segmentation without task-specific training data, making it applicable to domains where labeled segmentation data is scarce. It supports arbitrary text queries and can segment objects not represented in standard training sets. The model is commonly used in automated labeling pipelines, robotic perception, and domain-specific vision applications requiring open-vocabulary segmentation.

Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is a 397B-parameter (17B active) open-weight multimodal model developed by Alibaba’s Qwen team, released on 2026-02-16 under Apache-2.0. It supports text and image inputs with text outputs, combining a sparse Mixture-of-Experts architecture with Gated Delta Networks for efficient scaling. The model provides native vision-language reasoning and a large ~262K token context window, extendable to ~1M tokens.

As the first open-weight release in the Qwen3.5 family, it positions itself as a high-capacity, long-context alternative in the large vision-language space, balancing scale and efficiency via sparse activation. It is designed for advanced reasoning, coding, agent workflows, and multimodal understanding tasks.

Grounded SAM vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B Comparison Table

PropertyGrounded SAMQwen3.5 397B A17B
OrganizationIDEA ResearchQwen
Categoryopenopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateJan 2024Feb 2026
Context Window262K
Parameters397B
LicenseApache 2.0Apache 2.0
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.385
Output $/1M$2.45
Vision Tasks
Vision Language
CaptioningDemo
Object Detection
OCRDemo
Visual Question AnsweringDemo
Zero Shot Segmentation
Model Features
Multimodal Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Zero-shot Detection
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Overall Score
58.21%
Avg Response Time56.61s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens1.1K
Median output tokens54
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0006
Defect Detection
66.7%(10/15)
Document Understanding
77.8%(7/9)
Object Counting
20%(2/10)
Object Understanding
64.3%(9/14)
Spatial Understanding
57.9%(11/19)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology