GPT-6 Luna vs GPT-6 Sol
Compare GPT-6 Luna and GPT-6 Sol side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, OCR, Classification, Object Detection, Open Prompt, and Segmentation.
Compare GPT-6 Luna vs GPT-6 Sol live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Models in this comparison
GPT-6 Luna vs GPT-6 Sol on Vision Evals
GPT-6 Sol scores higher on all five Vision Evals tasks.
The widest gap is Object Detection, where GPT-6 Sol leads 74.7% to 65.5%.
Overall, GPT-6 Luna averages 69.7% (#21 of 63) against 76.9% (#12 of 63) for GPT-6 Sol.
GPT-6 Luna is cheaper ($0.0004 vs $0.0074 per sample), while GPT-6 Sol is faster (10.2s vs 10.2s per sample).
GPT-6 Luna vs GPT-6 Sol Comparison Table
Evals updated October 13, 2026Pricing updated October 17, 2026
| Property | GPT-6 Luna | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | OpenAI | OpenAI |
| Category | closed | closed |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Sep 2026 | Sep 2026 |
| Context Window | 1.1M | 1.1M |
| Parameters | Unknown | undisclosed |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Commercial use | commercial use per vendor terms | commercial use per vendor terms |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $0.100 | $2.00 |
| Output $/1M | $0.500 | $10.00 |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Captioning | Demo | Demo |
| Chart Question Answering | Supported | Supported |
| Classification | Demo | Demo |
| Document Question Answering | Supported | Supported |
| Image Tagging | Supported | Supported |
| Multi-Label Classification | Supported | Supported |
| Object Detection | Demo | Demo |
| OCR | Demo | Demo |
| Promptable Concept Segmentation | Demo | Demo |
| Vision Language | Supported | Supported |
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | Demo |
| Model Features | ||
| Foundation Vision | Supported | Supported |
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | Supported | Supported |
| Multimodal Vision | Supported | Supported |
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort | ||
| Overall | 69.7% | 76.9% |
| Avg cost / sample | $0.0004 | $0.0074 |
| Avg speed / sample | 10.21s | 10.20s |
| By task | ||
| Object Detection (low) | 65.5% ±0.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 65.2 to 66.0 | 74.7% ±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 74.1 to 75.5 |
| Object Detection (high) | 68.0% ±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 67.3 to 68.6 | 76.4% ±1.2, Mean of 3 runs, range 75.0 to 77.4 |
| Counting (low) | 71.6% ±0.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 71.6 to 71.6 | 76.6% ±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 74.3 to 78.4 |
| Counting (high) | 72.1% ±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 71.6 to 73.0 | 77.5% ±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 75.7 to 78.4 |
| Identification (low) | 87.5% ±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 84.4 to 90.6 | 93.8% ±0.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 93.8 to 93.8 |
| Identification (high) | 87.5% ±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 84.4 to 90.6 | 92.7% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 90.6 to 93.8 |
| OCR (low) | 59.8% | 66.7% |
| by category |
|
|
| OCR (high) | 62.5% | 68.8% |
| by category |
|
|
| Reasoning (low) | 64.2% ±3.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 60.3 to 66.2 | 72.6% ±3.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 69.5 to 76.8 |
| Reasoning (high) | 71.1% ±2.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 68.2 to 72.8 | 77.7% ±1.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 76.8 to 78.8 |
GPT-6 Luna vs GPT-6 Sol: Overview
GPT-6 Luna is the fast, cost-efficient tier of OpenAI's GPT-6 model family, sitting below GPT-6 Sol and the larger GPT-6 Astra model that opened the generation. It is a proprietary multimodal transformer that accepts text and image input and returns text, and it exposes an adjustable reasoning effort setting so the same model can run in a low-latency mode or spend additional inference compute on harder problems. OpenAI positions it for high-volume and latency-sensitive workloads such as conversational assistants, classification, and lightweight agentic pipelines, while noting that at higher reasoning effort it handles software engineering and computer-use tasks that previously required a Sol-tier model.
The model supports a context window of roughly 1,050,000 input tokens with a maximum output of 128,000 tokens, which allows long documents, extended agent traces, and large code repositories to be processed in a single request. OpenAI describes the GPT-6 generation as improving factual reliability and adopting a more concise communication style relative to the GPT-5.6 series, and attributes the efficiency of the Sol and Luna tiers to gains in caching and inference rather than to reduced capability. Architecture details, parameter counts, and training data are not published.
GPT-6 Sol is a proprietary multimodal reasoning model from OpenAI, released on September 22, 2026 alongside GPT-6 Luna as an efficiency-oriented tier of the GPT-6 family that began with GPT-6 Astra. OpenAI states that Sol and Luna are trained with methods similar to those used for Astra, carrying the same work on professional tasks, factuality, coding, computer use, and alignment into models that run faster. Sol accepts text and image input and returns text output, and OpenAI documents a context window of roughly one million tokens together with a knowledge cutoff of April 20, 2026.
The model targets complex coding and agentic workflows and exposes a configurable reasoning effort setting with levels of none, low, medium, high, xhigh, and max, which trades latency and token consumption against answer quality. OpenAI reports results including 33.2% on AutomationBench at xhigh effort and 56.4% on Agents' Last Exam at max effort, while its reported DeepSWE and OSWorld 2.0 figures of 68.8% and 64.4% fall below those of the earlier GPT-5.6 Sol. Its vision behavior covers image understanding tasks such as visual question answering, captioning, document and chart interpretation, and text recognition.
Frequently Asked Questions
On Roboflow's Vision Evals, GPT-6 Sol performed better. It scores higher on all five vision tasks and averages 76.9% (#12 of 63) against 69.7% (#21 of 63) for GPT-6 Luna. These scores measure vision capabilities only; either model may perform differently on work outside this benchmark's tasks.
No. On the Vision Evals Object Detection benchmark at low effort, GPT-6 Sol leads with 74.7% against 65.5%. This is the widest gap between the two models across the benchmark's tasks.
GPT-6 Luna is cheaper to run. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals task mix it averaged $0.0004 per sample against $0.0074. GPT-6 Luna is priced at $0.10 per 1M input tokens and $0.50 per 1M output; GPT-6 Sol is priced at $2.00 per 1M input tokens and $10.00 per 1M output. Actual costs depend on your image sizes, prompts, and output length.
GPT-6 Sol is faster. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals it averaged 10.2s per inference against 10.2s. Latency varies with image size, prompt length, and provider load, so treat these as relative rather than guaranteed figures.
Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for image captioning and OCR in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.