Roboflow

GPT-6.1 Terra vs SAM 3

GPT-6.1 Terra: 85.8% average across five Vision Evals tasks (#2 of 65 models). We have not run SAM 3 through Roboflow's Vision Evals, so there is no head-to-head score.

Meta

Compare GPT-6.1 Terra vs SAM 3 live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

These models don't share enough common tasks for a side-by-side demo. See the comparison table below for their capabilities.

GPT-6.1 Terra vs SAM 3 Comparison Table

Evals updated October 26, 2026Pricing updated October 27, 2026

PropertyGPT-6.1 TerraSAM 3
OrganizationOpenAIMeta
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateOct 2026Nov 2025
Context Window1.1M—
ParametersundisclosedUnknown
LicenseProprietaryCustom
Commercial usecommercial use per vendor termsSee license terms
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$1.00No published price
Output $/1M$5.00No published price
Vision Tasks
Object DetectionSupportedDemo
CaptioningSupportedNot listed
Chart Question AnsweringSupportedNot listed
ClassificationSupportedNot listed
Document Question AnsweringSupportedNot listed
Image TaggingSupportedNot listed
Instance SegmentationNot listedSupported
Multi-Label ClassificationSupportedNot listed
OCRSupportedNot listed
Open Vocabulary Object DetectionNot listedSupported
Promptable Concept SegmentationNot listedDemo
Video Object TrackingNot listedSupported
Vision LanguageSupportedNot listed
Visual Question AnsweringSupportedNot listed
Zero Shot SegmentationNot listedSupported
Model Features
LLMs with Vision CapabilitiesSupportedNot listed
Zero-shot DetectionNot listedSupported
Both support 2 more features
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
85.8%
Not evaluated
Avg cost / sample$0.0033–
Avg speed / sample10.05s–
By task
Object Detection (low)
84.7%
±0.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 84.7 to 84.8
$0.0051
–
Object Detection (high)
84.7%
±0.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 84.2 to 84.9
$0.0081
–
Counting (low)
80.2%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.4 to 82.4
$0.0018
–
Counting (high)
84.2%
±3.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.1 to 87.8
$0.0029
–
Identification (low)
96.9%
±0.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 96.9 to 96.9
$0.0013
–
Identification (high)
96.9%
±0.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 96.9 to 96.9
$0.0014
–
OCR (low)
81.9%
$0.0033
–
by category
Single value
70.9%
Transcription
96.7%
Structured JSON
91.5%
Text localization
77.6%
OCR (high)
84.4%
$0.0066
–
by category
Single value
74.8%
Transcription
97.0%
Structured JSON
93.4%
Text localization
79.2%
Reasoning (low)
85.4%
±1.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 83.4 to 86.8
$0.0016
–
Reasoning (high)
87.0%
±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 85.4 to 88.1
$0.0023
–

GPT-6.1 Terra vs SAM 3: Overview

GPT-6.1 Terra

GPT-6.1 Terra is an OpenAI model released on October 26, 2026 for visual reasoning, computer use and writing. It accepts text and image inputs and produces text, with a 1,050,000-token context window and up to 128,000 output tokens. OpenAI lists applications including matching product photographs to catalog entries, interpreting technical drawings and operating application screens.

The API exposes six reasoning effort settings: none, low, medium, high, xhigh and max. Medium is the default. The model supports structured outputs and tool calling through the Responses API. Vision Evals reports its Low and High results for text understanding, counting, identification, reasoning and object detection, using native OpenAI API inference. Terra is a proprietary model; its weights are not released.

SAM 3

Released on November 19th, 2025, Segment Anything 3 (SAM 3) is a zero-shot image segmentation model that “detects, segments, and tracks objects in images and videos based on concept prompts.” This model was developed by Meta as the third model in the Segment Anything series.

Unlike its previous SAM models (Segment Anything and Segment Anything 2), you can provide SAM 3 with the prompt “shipping container” and it will generate precise segmentation masks for all shipping containers in an image. SAM 3 generates segmentation masks that correspond to the location of the objects found with a text prompt.