Roboflow

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

GPT-6.1 Sol: 81.7% average across five Vision Evals tasks (#8 of 68 models). We have not run Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct through Roboflow's Vision Evals, so there is no head-to-head score.

Compare GPT-6.1 Sol vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
OpenAIGPT-6.1 Sol
Run to compare this model.
QwenQwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct can't be run right now. See its model page for details.

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct Comparison Table

Evals updated November 10, 2026Pricing updated November 11, 2026

PropertyGPT-6.1 SolQwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
OrganizationOpenAIQwen
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateSep 2026Jan 2025
Context Window1.1M33K
Parametersundisclosed7B
LicenseProprietaryApache 2.0
Commercial usecommercial use per vendor termsfree for commercial use
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$2.00No published price
Output $/1M$10.00No published price
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoSupported
ClassificationDemoSupported
Object DetectionDemoSupported
OCRDemoSupported
Visual Question AnsweringDemoSupported
Promptable Concept SegmentationDemoNot listed
Both support 5 more tasks
Model Features
Both support 3 more features
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
81.7%
Not evaluated
Avg cost / sample$0.0068–
Avg speed / sample12.82s–
By task
Object Detection (low)
80.8%
±0.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 80.7 to 80.9
$0.010
–
Object Detection (high)
81.6%
±0.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.1 to 82.0
$0.022
–
Counting (low)
78.8%
±3.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 75.7 to 82.4
$0.0037
–
Counting (high)
80.2%
±3.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 77.0 to 83.8
$0.0057
–
Identification (low)
89.6%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 87.5 to 90.6
$0.0025
–
Identification (high)
88.5%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 87.5 to 90.6
$0.0030
–
OCR (low)
75.8%
$0.0069
–
by category
Single value
58.3%
Transcription
95.7%
Structured JSON
89.5%
Text localization
74.4%
OCR (high)
75.8%
$0.016
–
by category
Single value
56.5%
Transcription
96.0%
Structured JSON
90.4%
Text localization
76.7%
Reasoning (low)
83.7%
±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 82.1 to 84.8
$0.0033
–
Reasoning (high)
88.7%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 87.4 to 91.4
$0.0042
–

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct: Overview

GPT-6.1 Sol

GPT-6.1 Sol is a reasoning model in OpenAI's GPT-6 series that accepts text and image input and returns text. It is an upgrade to GPT-6 Sol positioned to approach the intelligence of the larger GPT-6 Astra model on agentic coding, computer use, and professional knowledge work. The model exposes an adjustable reasoning effort control, ranging from low settings for simple turns to maximum settings for harder tasks, and can be driven with tool use enabled or disabled. It operates over a context window of roughly one million tokens and emits up to 128,000 output tokens in a single response, which supports long-running agent loops over large codebases and multi-document collections. Audio and video inputs are not supported.

OpenAI reports that GPT-6.1 Sol performs on par with or better than GPT-6 Sol across its image input safety evaluations, and that the share of responses containing a factual error at low reasoning effort falls from 11.4 percent to 7.7 percent.

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Qwen2.5-VL-7B-Instruct is a 7-billion parameter vision-language model from Alibaba’s QwenLM team, released on January 26, 2025 under the Apache 2.0 license. It is the instruction-tuned variant of the 7B scale in the Qwen2.5-VL family, designed to process multimodal inputs such as text, images, charts, documents, and video. The model enables structured outputs—including JSON for structured content and bounding boxes for visual localization. Weights are publicly available on Hugging Face and GitHub, making it suitable for both research and applied multimodal use.

Frequently Asked Questions

GPT-6.1 Sol is released under Proprietary, while Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct uses Apache 2.0. In practice: GPT-6.1 Sol: commercial use per vendor terms; Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct: free for commercial use. Licensing often matters more than raw accuracy for commercial deployments, so check the terms against how you plan to ship.

Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for image captioning and OCR in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.