GPT-5.6 Terra vs Grok 4.7
Compare GPT-5.6 Terra and Grok 4.7 side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Classification, Open Prompt, Object Detection, OCR, and Image Captioning.
Compare GPT-5.6 Terra vs Grok 4.7 live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Models in this comparison
GPT-5.6 Terra vs Grok 4.7 on Vision Evals
Grok 4.7 scores higher on 3 of the five Vision Evals tasks.
The widest gap is Object Detection, where GPT-5.6 Terra leads 60.6% to 40.4%.
Overall, GPT-5.6 Terra averages 66.0% (#26 of 63) against 63.5% (#31 of 63) for Grok 4.7.
GPT-5.6 Terra is both cheaper ($0.010 vs $0.020 per sample) and faster (9.5s vs 33.3s per sample).
GPT-5.6 Terra vs Grok 4.7 Comparison Table
Evals updated October 13, 2026Pricing updated October 17, 2026
| Property | GPT-5.6 Terra | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | OpenAI | SpaceXAI |
| Category | closed | closed |
| Modality | multimodal | — |
| Release Date | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 |
| Context Window | 1.1M | 500K |
| Parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Commercial use | commercial use per vendor terms | commercial use per vendor terms |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $2.00 | $2.00 |
| Output $/1M | $12.00 | $6.00 |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Captioning | Demo | Demo |
| Chart Question Answering | Supported | Supported |
| Classification | Demo | Demo |
| Document Question Answering | Supported | Supported |
| Image Tagging | Supported | Supported |
| Multi-Label Classification | Supported | Supported |
| Object Detection | Demo | Demo |
| OCR | Demo | Demo |
| Vision Language | Supported | Supported |
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | Demo |
| Model Features | ||
| Foundation Vision | Supported | Not listed |
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | Supported | Not listed |
| Multimodal Vision | Supported | Not listed |
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort | ||
| Overall | 66.0% | 63.5% |
| Avg cost / sample | $0.010 | $0.020 |
| Avg speed / sample | 9.52s | 33.31s |
| By task | ||
| Object Detection (low) | 60.6% ±0.2, Mean of 3 runs, range 60.3 to 60.7 | 40.4% ±0.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 39.8 to 41.0 |
| Object Detection (high) | 61.3% ±0.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 60.8 to 61.6 | 41.2% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 39.6 to 42.8 |
| Counting (low) | 65.8% ±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 63.5 to 67.6 | 61.7% ±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 60.8 to 63.5 |
| Counting (high) | 62.6% ±2.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 59.5 to 64.9 | 60.8% ±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 59.5 to 62.2 |
| Identification (low) | 86.5% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 84.4 to 87.5 | 87.5% ±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 84.4 to 90.6 |
| Identification (high) | 86.5% ±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 84.4 to 90.6 | 80.2% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.1 to 81.3 |
| OCR (low) | 56.3% | 63.6% |
| by category |
|
|
| OCR (high) | 56.9% | – |
| by category |
| |
| Reasoning (low) | 60.9% ±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 59.6 to 63.6 | 64.2% ±2.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 62.3 to 66.9 |
| Reasoning (high) | 65.3% ±1.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 64.2 to 66.2 | 66.9% ±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 65.6 to 68.2 |
GPT-5.6 Terra vs Grok 4.7: Overview
GPT-5.6 Terra is the mid-tier reasoning model in OpenAI's GPT-5.6 family, which also includes the flagship Sol and the lightweight Luna. Introduced in a limited preview on June 26, 2026, and made broadly available on July 9, 2026, Terra accepts text and image input and produces text output, supporting vision, function calling, tool use, and agentic workflows. It is designed as a balanced option for everyday professional and production workloads — including coding assistance, document analysis, customer support, and multi-step agent tasks — where both output quality and cost efficiency matter. OpenAI positions Terra as delivering performance competitive with GPT-5.5 at approximately half the price, with a context window of around 1,050,000 tokens. On Terminal-Bench 2.1, Terra scores 84.3%, matching Claude Fable 5 on that benchmark. Under OpenAI's Preparedness Framework, Terra is rated High for cybersecurity and biological capabilities, meaning it demonstrates meaningful capability in those domains without reaching the Critical threshold.
GPT-5.6 introduces a new naming convention in which the generation number (5.6) is paired with a durable capability tier name (Sol, Terra, or Luna), allowing each tier to advance on its own schedule. Terra carries the API identifier gpt-5.6-terra and supports the same reasoning effort controls available across the family, including adjustable reasoning depth. The model includes prompt caching with explicit cache breakpoints and a 30-minute minimum cache life, with cache writes billed at 1.25x the uncached input rate and cache reads receiving a 90% discount. GPT-5.6 Terra is a proprietary, closed-weights model served through the OpenAI API, Codex, and ChatGPT.
Grok 4.7 is a proprietary multimodal reasoning model from SpaceXAI that accepts images alongside text and returns text-only output. On visual inputs it supports image captioning, visual question answering, OCR, document and chart question answering, and image classification and tagging, with all results expressed as generated text rather than bounding boxes or masks. Its 500,000 token context window leaves room for several images, long documents, or extended conversations about visual content in a single request.
The model exposes a configurable reasoning effort setting with low, medium, high, and xhigh levels (high by default), letting callers trade latency for the amount of deliberation spent on a prompt, including multi-step questions about an image. Built on a larger base model than Grok 4.6 with extended reinforcement learning on harder tasks, it works longer on difficult problems and checks its own work more carefully at the same serving speed. SpaceXAI's launch materials focus on coding and agentic knowledge work and report no image benchmark results.
Frequently Asked Questions
On Roboflow's Vision Evals, Grok 4.7 performed better. It scores higher on 3 of the five vision tasks and averages 63.5% (#31 of 63) against 66.0% (#26 of 63) for GPT-5.6 Terra. These scores measure vision capabilities only; either model may perform differently on work outside this benchmark's tasks.
Yes. On the Vision Evals Object Detection benchmark at low effort, GPT-5.6 Terra leads with 60.6% against 40.4%. This is the widest gap between the two models across the benchmark's tasks.
GPT-5.6 Terra is cheaper to run. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals task mix it averaged $0.010 per sample against $0.020. GPT-5.6 Terra is priced at $2.00 per 1M input tokens and $12.00 per 1M output; Grok 4.7 is priced at $2.00 per 1M input tokens and $6.00 per 1M output. Actual costs depend on your image sizes, prompts, and output length.
GPT-5.6 Terra is faster. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals it averaged 9.5s per inference against 33.3s. Latency varies with image size, prompt length, and provider load, so treat these as relative rather than guaranteed figures.
Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for image classification and open prompts in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.