Roboflow

Grok 4.7 vs Kimi K3

Grok 4.7 and Kimi K3 score 63.5% vs 56.0% averaged across five Vision Evals tasks (#37 and #49 of 69 models), so Grok 4.7 leads overall.

  • Grok 4.7 wins 4 of the 5 tasks, with its widest lead on reasoning (64.2% vs 42.4%).
  • Kimi K3 is about a quarter of the cost: $0.0052 vs $0.020 overall average cost per sample.
  • Kimi K3 is faster: 9.9s vs 33.3s per sample.
MoonshotAI

Compare Grok 4.7 vs Kimi K3 live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
GrokGrok 4.7
Run to compare this model.
MoonshotAIKimi K3
Run to compare this model.

Grok 4.7 vs Kimi K3 on Vision Evals

Score by taskGrok 4.7Kimi K3
Reasoning
64.2
42.4
Counting
61.7
46.0
Object Detection
40.4
51.9
Identification
87.5
81.3
OCR
63.6
58.6

Roboflow Vision Evals. Full breakdown below.

Grok 4.7 vs Kimi K3 Comparison Table

Evals updated November 12, 2026Pricing updated November 13, 2026

PropertyGrok 4.7Kimi K3
OrganizationSpaceXAIMoonshot AI
Categoryclosedopen
Modality—multimodal
Release DateSep 2026Jul 2026
Context Window500K1.0M
ParametersUnknown2.8T
LicenseProprietaryModified MIT
Commercial usecommercial use per vendor termsSee license terms
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$2.00$0.192
Output $/1M$6.00$16.00
Vision Tasks
Both support 10 more tasks
Model Features
Foundation VisionNot listedSupported
LLMs with Vision CapabilitiesNot listedSupported
Multimodal VisionNot listedSupported
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
63.5%
56.0%
Avg cost / sample$0.020$0.0052
Avg speed / sample33.31s9.86s
By task
Object Detection (low)
40.4%
±0.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 39.8 to 41.0
$0.021
51.9%
$0.010
Object Detection (high)
41.2%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 39.6 to 42.8
$0.028
–
Counting (low)
61.7%
±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 60.8 to 63.5
$0.011
46.0%
$0.0005
Counting (high)
60.8%
±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 59.5 to 62.2
$0.017
–
Identification (low)
87.5%
±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 84.4 to 90.6
$0.0063
81.3%
$0.0005
Identification (high)
80.2%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.1 to 81.3
$0.0093
–
OCR (low)
63.6%
$0.023
58.6%
$0.0053
by category
Single value
54.4%
Transcription
89.5%
Structured JSON
86.4%
Text localization
14.8%
Single value
43.0%
Transcription
75.1%
Structured JSON
78.1%
Text localization
39.3%
OCR (high)–
61.8%
$0.033
by category
Single value
43.9%
Transcription
80.4%
Structured JSON
82.9%
Text localization
43.4%
Reasoning (low)
64.2%
±2.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 62.3 to 66.9
$0.015
42.4%
$0.0005
Reasoning (high)
66.9%
±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 65.6 to 68.2
$0.024
74.2%
$0.035

Grok 4.7 vs Kimi K3: Overview

Grok 4.7

Grok 4.7 is a proprietary multimodal reasoning model from SpaceXAI that accepts images alongside text and returns text-only output. On visual inputs it supports image captioning, visual question answering, OCR, document and chart question answering, and image classification and tagging, with all results expressed as generated text rather than bounding boxes or masks. Its 500,000 token context window leaves room for several images, long documents, or extended conversations about visual content in a single request.

The model exposes a configurable reasoning effort setting with low, medium, high, and xhigh levels (high by default), letting callers trade latency for the amount of deliberation spent on a prompt, including multi-step questions about an image. Built on a larger base model than Grok 4.6 with extended reinforcement learning on harder tasks, it works longer on difficult problems and checks its own work more carefully at the same serving speed. SpaceXAI's launch materials focus on coding and agentic knowledge work and report no image benchmark results.

Kimi K3

Kimi K3 is a sparse Mixture-of-Experts large language model developed by Moonshot AI, with 2.8 trillion total parameters and a 1-million-token context window. The model activates 16 out of 896 experts per token using the Stable LatentMoE framework, and is built on two architectural innovations: Kimi Delta Attention (KDA), a hybrid linear attention mechanism that enables up to 6.3x faster decoding in long-context settings, and Attention Residuals (AttnRes), which selectively retrieves representations across model depth and delivers roughly 25% higher training efficiency. Together with refined training and data recipes, these structural advances yield approximately 2.5x better overall scaling efficiency compared to its predecessor Kimi K2. The model applies quantization-aware training from the supervised fine-tuning stage onward, using MXFP4 weights with MXFP8 activations for hardware compatibility. Thinking mode is always enabled at launch, with reasoning effort configurable via the reasoning_effort field.

Kimi K3 supports native visual understanding alongside text, accepting image inputs for tasks that combine software engineering and visual reasoning. It targets long-horizon coding, knowledge work, and agentic workflows, and ships in two variants: K3 Max for general chat and agent tasks, and K3 Swarm Max for large-scale parallel processing across many coordinated sub-agents. The model is compatible with the OpenAI SDK via an OpenAI-compatible API. Full model weights are scheduled for release by July 27, 2026 under a Modified MIT license, following the open-weight pattern established by the Kimi K2 model family. A technical report with full architecture, training, and evaluation details is expected to accompany the weights release.