Roboflow

GPT-5.4 Nano vs GPT-5 Mini

Compare GPT-5.4 Nano and GPT-5 Mini side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in OCR, Image Captioning, Classification, Object Detection, and Open Prompt.

Compare GPT-5.4 Nano vs GPT-5 Mini live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
OpenAIGPT-5.4 Nano
Run to compare this model.
OpenAIGPT-5 Mini
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

GPT-5.4 Nano vs GPT-5 Mini: Overview

GPT-5.4 Nano

GPT-5.4 nano is a high-throughput model developed by OpenAI and released on March 17, 2026, as the efficiency-optimized entry in the GPT-5.4 family. Engineered for cost-sensitive production environments and latency-critical workloads, it features an expanded 400,000-token context window that enables the processing of large document batches or extensive logs in a single pass. The model is primarily optimized for text-heavy operations, serving as a premier engine for high-volume classification, data extraction, ranking, and the orchestration of lightweight sub-agents where speed and low per-token costs are the primary requirements.

While it supports text and image inputs, GPT-5.4 nano is designed as a text-first worker rather than a specialized visual reasoning tool. In multi-model architectures, it is best utilized for structured text tasks and simple coding sub-tasks, leaving intensive vision reasoning and UI navigation to its sibling, GPT-5.4 mini. Compared to the previous GPT-5 nano, this version provides a significant leap in reliability for structured outputs and tool calling, making it a dependable and economical choice for developers building scalable, automated pipelines that require rapid execution at the edge of the GPT-5.4 ecosystem.

GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Mini, released by OpenAI on August 7, 2025, is a mid-tier variant of the GPT-5 family that balances cost, speed, and capability. It is multimodal, supporting both text and image inputs, and offers a substantial input context window of ~400,000 tokens with output lengths up to ~128,000 tokens. While less powerful than the full GPT-5, it inherits its safety tuning, instruction-following improvements, and multimodal reasoning, making it a practical choice for developers who need large context handling without the expense of premium models.

GPT-5 Mini is optimized for affordability while retaining strong reasoning performance. Benchmarks show it outperforming earlier models such as GPT-4o on many multimodal and medical VQA tasks, though it lags behind GPT-5 on the most complex problems. Ideal use cases include prototyping, scalable content generation, document analysis, and mid-range reasoning tasks where efficiency and context capacity matter more than top-tier accuracy.

GPT-5.4 Nano vs GPT-5 Mini Comparison Table

PropertyGPT-5.4 NanoGPT-5 Mini
OrganizationOpenAIOpenAI
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateMar 2026Aug 2025
Context Window400K400K
Parameters
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.200$0.250
Output $/1M$1.25$2.00
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
ClassificationDemoDemo
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Model Features
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
62.69%
73.13%
Avg Response Time3.72s11.72s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens1.4K1.4K
Median output tokens105143
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0004$0.0006
Defect Detection
80%(12/15)
80%(12/15)
Document Understanding
77.8%(7/9)
77.8%(7/9)
Object Counting
30%(3/10)
10%(1/10)
Object Understanding
64.3%(9/14)
85.7%(12/14)
Spatial Understanding
57.9%(11/19)
89.5%(17/19)
OCR
Overall Score
62.45%
76.86%
Avg Response Time2.59s4.63s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens105105
Median output tokens87209
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0001$0.0004
Focused Scene OCR
55.6%(55/99)
72.7%(72/99)
Handwritten Math
20%(2/10)
50%(5/10)
License Plate Recognition
83.3%(25/30)
93.3%(28/30)
Text Recognition
70%(21/30)
80%(24/30)
VQA & Extraction
66.7%(40/60)
78.3%(47/60)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology