GPT-5.4 Nano vs GPT-5 Mini
Compare GPT-5.4 Nano and GPT-5 Mini side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in OCR, Image Captioning, Classification, Object Detection, and Open Prompt.
Compare GPT-5.4 Nano vs GPT-5 Mini live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Models in this comparison
GPT-5.4 Nano vs GPT-5 Mini: Overview
GPT-5.4 nano is a high-throughput model developed by OpenAI and released on March 17, 2026, as the efficiency-optimized entry in the GPT-5.4 family. Engineered for cost-sensitive production environments and latency-critical workloads, it features an expanded 400,000-token context window that enables the processing of large document batches or extensive logs in a single pass. The model is primarily optimized for text-heavy operations, serving as a premier engine for high-volume classification, data extraction, ranking, and the orchestration of lightweight sub-agents where speed and low per-token costs are the primary requirements.
While it supports text and image inputs, GPT-5.4 nano is designed as a text-first worker rather than a specialized visual reasoning tool. In multi-model architectures, it is best utilized for structured text tasks and simple coding sub-tasks, leaving intensive vision reasoning and UI navigation to its sibling, GPT-5.4 mini. Compared to the previous GPT-5 nano, this version provides a significant leap in reliability for structured outputs and tool calling, making it a dependable and economical choice for developers building scalable, automated pipelines that require rapid execution at the edge of the GPT-5.4 ecosystem.
GPT-5 Mini, released by OpenAI on August 7, 2025, is a mid-tier variant of the GPT-5 family that balances cost, speed, and capability. It is multimodal, supporting both text and image inputs, and offers a substantial input context window of ~400,000 tokens with output lengths up to ~128,000 tokens. While less powerful than the full GPT-5, it inherits its safety tuning, instruction-following improvements, and multimodal reasoning, making it a practical choice for developers who need large context handling without the expense of premium models.
GPT-5 Mini is optimized for affordability while retaining strong reasoning performance. Benchmarks show it outperforming earlier models such as GPT-4o on many multimodal and medical VQA tasks, though it lags behind GPT-5 on the most complex problems. Ideal use cases include prototyping, scalable content generation, document analysis, and mid-range reasoning tasks where efficiency and context capacity matter more than top-tier accuracy.
GPT-5.4 Nano vs GPT-5 Mini Comparison Table
| Property | GPT-5.4 Nano | GPT-5 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | OpenAI | OpenAI |
| Category | closed | closed |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Mar 2026 | Aug 2025 |
| Context Window | 400K | 400K |
| Parameters | ||
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $0.200 | $0.250 |
| Output $/1M | $1.25 | $2.00 |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Captioning | Demo | Demo |
| Classification | Demo | Demo |
| Object Detection | Demo | Demo |
| OCR | Demo | Demo |
| Vision Language | ||
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | Demo |
| Model Features | ||
| Foundation Vision | ||
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | ||
| Multimodal Vision | ||
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts Score key:≥75%40–74%<40% | ||
| Visual Understanding | ||
| Overall Score | 62.69% | 73.13% |
| Avg Response Time | 3.72s | 11.72s |
| Median input tokensincl. image tokens | 1.4K | 1.4K |
| Median output tokens | 105 | 143 |
| Est. cost / taskon this benchmark | $0.0004 | $0.0006 |
| Defect Detection | 80%(12/15) | 80%(12/15) |
| Document Understanding | 77.8%(7/9) | 77.8%(7/9) |
| Object Counting | 30%(3/10) | 10%(1/10) |
| Object Understanding | 64.3%(9/14) | 85.7%(12/14) |
| Spatial Understanding | 57.9%(11/19) | 89.5%(17/19) |
| OCR | ||
| Overall Score | 62.45% | 76.86% |
| Avg Response Time | 2.59s | 4.63s |
| Median input tokensincl. image tokens | 105 | 105 |
| Median output tokens | 87 | 209 |
| Est. cost / taskon this benchmark | $0.0001 | $0.0004 |
| Focused Scene OCR | 55.6%(55/99) | 72.7%(72/99) |
| Handwritten Math | 20%(2/10) | 50%(5/10) |
| License Plate Recognition | 83.3%(25/30) | 93.3%(28/30) |
| Text Recognition | 70%(21/30) | 80%(24/30) |
| VQA & Extraction | 66.7%(40/60) | 78.3%(47/60) |
Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology