GPT-5.4 Mini vs MiMo V2.6 Pro
Compare GPT-5.4 Mini and MiMo V2.6 Pro side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Open Prompt, Object Detection, Classification, Image Captioning, and OCR.
Compare GPT-5.4 Mini vs MiMo V2.6 Pro live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Models in this comparison
GPT-5.4 Mini vs MiMo V2.6 Pro on Vision Evals
GPT-5.4 Mini scores higher on 4 of the six Vision Evals tasks.
The widest gap is Object Detection, where MiMo V2.6 Pro leads 42.0% to 15.8%.
Overall, GPT-5.4 Mini averages 64.7% (#42 of 59) against 62.5% (#49 of 59) for MiMo V2.6 Pro.
MiMo V2.6 Pro is cheaper ($0.0008 vs $0.0030 per sample), while GPT-5.4 Mini is faster (5.3s vs 8.5s per sample).
GPT-5.4 Mini vs MiMo V2.6 Pro Comparison Table
Evals updated September 22, 2026Pricing updated September 23, 2026
| Property | GPT-5.4 Mini | MiMo V2.6 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | OpenAI | Xiaomi |
| Category | closed | open |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Mar 2026 | Sep 2026 |
| Context Window | 400K | 1.0M |
| Parameters | 1.02T total, 42B active | |
| License | Proprietary | MIT |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $0.750 | $0.435 |
| Output $/1M | $4.50 | $0.870 |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Captioning | Demo | Demo |
| Chart Question Answering | ||
| Classification | Demo | Demo |
| Document Question Answering | ||
| Image Tagging | ||
| Multi-Label Classification | ||
| Object Detection | Demo | Demo |
| OCR | Demo | Demo |
| Vision Language | ||
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | Demo |
| Model Features | ||
| Foundation Vision | ||
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | ||
| Multimodal Vision | ||
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort | ||
| Overall | 64.7% | 62.5% |
| Avg cost / sample | $0.0030 | $0.0008 |
| Avg speed / sample | 5.25s | 8.47s |
| By task | ||
| Object Detection (low) | 15.8% ±0.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 15.3 to 16.1 | 42.0% ±1.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 40.9 to 43.1 |
| Object Detection (high) | 16.6% ±0.8, Mean of 3 runs, range 15.8 to 17.4 | 46.7% ±0.8, Mean of 3 runs, range 45.7 to 47.3 |
| Counting (low) | 58.6% ±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 56.8 to 60.8 | 50.0% ±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 48.6 to 52.7 |
| Counting (high) | 64.9% ±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 63.5 to 67.6 | 59.0% ±5.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 52.7 to 63.5 |
| Identification (low) | 83.3% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.3 to 84.4 | 76.0% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 75.0 to 78.1 |
| Identification (high) | 82.3% ±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.1 to 84.4 | 78.1% ±4.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 71.9 to 81.3 |
| OCR (low) | 89.5% ±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 88.1 to 90.6 | 90.7% ±1.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 88.5 to 91.9 |
| OCR (high) | 89.0% ±1.8, Mean of 3 runs, range 87.7 to 91.2 | 87.5% ±2.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 85.3 to 90.6 |
| Data Extraction (low) | 84.2% ±2.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 82.5 to 86.6 | 81.1% ±0.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 80.4 to 81.4 |
| Data Extraction (high) | 82.1% ±2.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 80.4 to 84.5 | 80.4% ±1.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 79.4 to 82.5 |
| Reasoning (low) | 57.0% ±3.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 54.3 to 60.9 | 35.1% ±2.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 32.5 to 37.8 |
| Reasoning (high) | 64.0% ±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 62.9 to 65.6 | 55.9% ±2.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 54.3 to 58.9 |
GPT-5.4 Mini vs MiMo V2.6 Pro: Overview
GPT-5.4 mini is a fast, cost-efficient model developed by OpenAI and released on March 17, 2026, optimized for high-throughput workloads and subagent orchestration. It supports text and image inputs within a 400,000-token context window, making it ideal for processing extensive visual datasets and large codebases in a single request. Designed for low-latency production environments, the model integrates with key API features including function calling, web search, and tool-based computer use, allowing it to assist in automated workflows that require navigating digital interfaces.
Compared to the previous GPT-5 mini, this version runs more than twice as fast while approaching the performance levels of the flagship GPT-5.4 on reasoning and coding benchmarks. While the larger GPT-5.4 introduces native, state-of-the-art computer-use capabilities, GPT-5.4 mini provides a scalable alternative for interpreting screenshots and reasoning over dense UI layouts. For vision tasks on Playground, it excels at extracting structured information from visual documents and assisting in agentic tasks that involve real-time interpretation of software interfaces alongside text.
MiMo V2.6 Pro is the flagship omni-modal foundation model in Xiaomi's MiMo V2.6 series, released as open weights alongside a Flash variant and a 9B distillation of Qwen3.5. It uses a sparse mixture-of-experts transformer with 1.02 trillion total parameters and roughly 42 billion activated per token, paired with a hybrid attention design that interleaves sliding-window and global attention layers to support a context window of about one million tokens. Dedicated encoders handle non-text inputs, including a vision encoder of roughly 681 million parameters and an audio tokenizer stack, so the model accepts text, images, video, and audio and returns text.
Post-training centers on large-scale reinforcement learning across thousands of interactive environments, combined with agentic grading, self-correction cold start, and a multi-prefix multi-teacher on-policy distillation stage that extends behavior to tasks that are hard to verify automatically. The resulting model targets long-horizon agentic work such as software engineering, terminal and computer-use operation, tool calling, cybersecurity analysis, and visual coding, and it reports gains over the prior MiMo generation on SWE-bench Verified, Terminal Bench, and internal visual coding and cyber benchmarks.
Frequently Asked Questions
On Roboflow's Vision Evals, GPT-5.4 Mini performed better. It scores higher on 4 of the six vision tasks and averages 64.7% (#42 of 59) against 62.5% (#49 of 59) for MiMo V2.6 Pro. These scores measure vision capabilities only; either model may perform differently on work outside this benchmark's tasks.
No. On the Vision Evals Object Detection benchmark at low effort, MiMo V2.6 Pro leads with 42.0% against 15.8%. This is the widest gap between the two models across the benchmark's tasks.
MiMo V2.6 Pro is cheaper to run. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals task mix it averaged $0.0008 per sample against $0.0030. GPT-5.4 Mini is priced at $0.75 per 1M input tokens and $4.50 per 1M output; MiMo V2.6 Pro is priced at $0.43 per 1M input tokens and $0.87 per 1M output. Actual costs depend on your image sizes, prompts, and output length.
GPT-5.4 Mini is faster. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals it averaged 5.3s per inference against 8.5s. Latency varies with image size, prompt length, and provider load, so treat these as relative rather than guaranteed figures.
Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for open prompts and object detection in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.